What is the tragedy of the commons? The tragedy of the commons A. occurs when two firms make a collusive agreement that is not in the best interest of society OB. is the situation that arises when the economy provides too little of a common resource OC. is a situation in which the government, elected by the common people creates inefficiency by its actions OD. is the overuse of a common resource that arises when its users have no incentive to conserve it and use it sustainably The free up of

What is the tragedy of the commons? The tragedy of the commons A. occurs when two firms make a collusive agreement that is not in the best interest of society OB. is the situation that arises when the economy provides too little of a common resource OC. is a situation in which the government, elected by the common people creates inefficiency by its actions OD. is the overuse of a common resource that arises when its users have no incentive to conserve it and use it sustainably The free up of

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two travelers own an identical suitcase that contains identical antiques. The airline is liable for a maximum of $100 per suitcase. To determine how much to reimburse each traveler, the airline puts them in different rooms (so that they cannot communicate), and ask them to write down an amount (an integer number) between $2 and $100. If both write down the same number, the airline will reimburse both travelers that amount. However, if the two amounts are different, both travelers will be paid the lowest of the two numbers along with a bonus/malus: $2 extra will be paid to the traveler who wrote down the lower value and a $2 deduction will be taken from the person who wrote down the higher amount. What are the travelers’ best response functions? What are the Nash equilbria of the game? Are they Pareto efficient? Explain the intuition why.
Nn3 Suppose an incumbent monopoly firm currently earns a profit of $50,000 per period. A potential entrant could enter and make a profit of $15,000 per period while also lowering the incumbent’s profit to $20,000 per period. The monopoly firm could seek to engage in predatory pricing, which would lead to both firms earning a loss of $5,000 per period. (a) Is there a Nash Equilibrium in this game? If so, what is it? (b) Discuss how this game might play out in the real world?
Thelma is indifferent between $100 and a bet with a 0.6 chance of no return and a 0.4 chance of $200. If U(0) = 20 and U(200) = 220, then U(100) = :
[3%] 4. Consider the two-player game shown in the table below. Player 1 chooses between four possible strategies: A, B, C and D. Player 2 can choose among three possible strategies: a, b and c. In each cell of the table, the first number is the payoff for Player 1, the second number is the payoff for Player 2. Higher numbers represent higher payoffs. Player 2 a b C A 2,-2 4,0 -6,-2 B Player 1 4,-4 3,-3 9, 1 C 2,6 -1,4 6,4 D 6,2 0,4 -9,0 (a) Simplify the game as far as possible using the iterated deletion of strictly dominated strategies. Clearly explain the steps of your reasoning. [2%] (b) Identify any pure strategy Nash equilibria of the simplified game derived in part (a). [1%] (c) Identify any mixed strategy Nash equilibria of the simplified game derived in part (a). Write down the best response function for each player. Draw these functions Page 3 of 5
Three players (player 1, player 2 and player 3) each chooses a positive integer QE {1, 2, 3, . 100}. If all three players choose the same integer Q, each player gets $100/3. If all three players choose different integers, the player with the largest integer gets $100, and the two other players get $0. If two players choose the same integer Q, and the third player chooses a different integer Q', then the player playing Q' gets $0, and the two players who played Q get $50 each. Find 2 Nash equilibriums in this game. ....
Bella Robinson and Steve Carson are running for a seat in the U.S. Senate. If both candidates campaign only in the major cities of the state, then Robinson is expected to get 80% of the votes; if both candidates campaign in only rural areas, then Robinson is expected get 75% of the votes; if Robinson campaigns exclusively in the city and Carson campaigns exclusively in the rural areas, then Robinson is expected to get 30% of the votes; finally, if Robinson campaigns exclusively in the rural areas and Carson campaigns exclusively in the city, then Robinson is expected to get 65% of the votes. (a) Construct the payoff matrix for the game. (Enter each percentage as a decimal.) Carson City Rural Robinson CityRural Is the game strictly determined? YesNo (b) Find the optimal strategy for both Robinson (row) and Carson (column). P = Q =