What is the tragedy of the commons? The tragedy of the commons A. occurs when two firms make a collusive agreement that is not in the best interest of society OB. is the situation that arises when the economy provides too little of a common resource OC. is a situation in which the government, elected by the common people creates inefficiency by its actions OD. is the overuse of a common resource that arises when its users have no incentive to conserve it and use it sustainably The free up of

What is the tragedy of the commons? The tragedy of the commons A. occurs when two firms make a collusive agreement that is not in the best interest of society OB. is the situation that arises when the economy provides too little of a common resource OC. is a situation in which the government, elected by the common people creates inefficiency by its actions OD. is the overuse of a common resource that arises when its users have no incentive to conserve it and use it sustainably The free up of

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

An investor allocates $30,000 and $50,000 to two assets (A1 and A2). These assets generate 5% and -4.5% rate of returns, respectively. She allocates the remaining 50% of her portfolio to an asset (A3), which provides 4.5% rate of return. Calculate the portfolio's rate of return.
The research department at a manufacturing company has developed a new process that it believes will result in an improved product Management must decide whether to go ahead and market the new product. The new product may or may not be better than the old one. If the new product is better and the company decides to market it, sales should increase by $50,000. If it is not better and they replace the old product with the new product on the market, they will lose $24,000 to competitors. If they decide not to market the new product, they will lose a total of $30,000 if it is better and just research costs of $10,000 if it is not. Answer parts a through c below. (a) Prepare a payoff matrix. (Type an integer or decimal for each matrix element. Do not include the $ symbol in your answer.) (b) If management believes there is a probability of 0.4 that the new product is better, find the expected profits under each strategy and determine the best action. Select the correct answer below and fill…
Matthew is playing snooker (more difficult variant of pool) with his friend. He is not sure which strategy to choose for his next shot. He can try and pot a relatively difficult red ball (strategy R1), which he will pot with probability 0.4. If he pots it, he will have to play the black ball, which he will pot with probability 0.3. His second option (strategy R2) is to try and pot a relatively easy red, which he will pot with probability 0.7. If he pots it, he will have to play the blue ball, which he will pot with probability 0.6. His third option, (strategy R3) is to play safe, meaning not trying to pot any ball and give a difficult shot for his opponent to then make a foul, which will give Matthew 4 points with probability 0.5. If potted, the red balls are worth 1 point each, while the blue ball is worth 5 points, and the black ball 7 points. If he does not pot any ball, he gets 0 point. By using the EMV rule, which strategy should Matthew choose? And what is his expected…
please answer within 30 minutes.
Two travelers own an identical suitcase that contains identical antiques. The airline is liable for a maximum of $100 per suitcase. To determine how much to reimburse each traveler, the airline puts them in different rooms (so that they cannot communicate), and ask them to write down an amount (an integer number) between $2 and $100. If both write down the same number, the airline will reimburse both travelers that amount. However, if the two amounts are different, both travelers will be paid the lowest of the two numbers along with a bonus/malus: $2 extra will be paid to the traveler who wrote down the lower value and a $2 deduction will be taken from the person who wrote down the higher amount. What are the travelers’ best response functions? What are the Nash equilbria of the game? Are they Pareto efficient? Explain the intuition why.
Suppose you are deciding whether you should go to college. If you go to college, you will pay $10,000 total in tuition, textbooks, and room and board every year for 4 years, with the first payment being made immediately and then the next three payments 1 year apart. Upon graduating, you expect to get a job earning $50,000 per year for the next 40 years. Assume that your first paycheck arrives exactly 1 year after you start working and you continue getting paid annually thereafter. Also assume that there are no raises in that particular field. If you do not go to college, you can start working immediately. The pay, however, is lower. You would expect to work for 44 years and earn $34,000 per year, with your first paycheck arriving exactly 1 year from now, and you continue getting paid annually thereafter. For the questions below, round all numbers to two decimals. Show Transcribed Text Part 1 (1 point) Assume the interest rate is 7%. If you were to attend college, the present value of…
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular In the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the "residual value," computed as 60% Df the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the retumed cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). Suppose two customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whether keep (and purchase at 60% of the new car price) their cars or return thelr cars. Two years ago, Becky leased a car valued new at $18,500. If she returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get $12,950 at auction for the car. Eleen also leased a car, valued new at $19,000, two years ago. If she returns the car, the…
Nn3 Suppose an incumbent monopoly firm currently earns a profit of $50,000 per period. A potential entrant could enter and make a profit of $15,000 per period while also lowering the incumbent’s profit to $20,000 per period. The monopoly firm could seek to engage in predatory pricing, which would lead to both firms earning a loss of $5,000 per period. (a) Is there a Nash Equilibrium in this game? If so, what is it? (b) Discuss how this game might play out in the real world?
Thelma is indifferent between $100 and a bet with a 0.6 chance of no return and a 0.4 chance of $200. If U(0) = 20 and U(200) = 220, then U(100) = :
Bella Robinson and Steve Carson are running for a seat in the U.S. Senate. If both candidates campaign only in the major cities of the state, then Robinson is expected to get 80% of the votes; if both candidates campaign in only rural areas, then Robinson is expected get 75% of the votes; if Robinson campaigns exclusively in the city and Carson campaigns exclusively in the rural areas, then Robinson is expected to get 30% of the votes; finally, if Robinson campaigns exclusively in the rural areas and Carson campaigns exclusively in the city, then Robinson is expected to get 65% of the votes. (a) Construct the payoff matrix for the game. (Enter each percentage as a decimal.) Carson City Rural Robinson CityRural Is the game strictly determined? YesNo (b) Find the optimal strategy for both Robinson (row) and Carson (column). P = Q =
[Cheap Talk] Two players must decide whether to implement a project, which has gross value v E {0, 100, 200} to each player. Both players think each value is equally likely. Player 1 (the sender) learns the true value of the project. Then, he reports a value {high,medium,low} to player 2 (the decider), and player 2 decides whether or not to implement the project. If the project is not implemented, both players get zero. If a project with value v is implemented, payoffs are P1 : v – 75 P2 : – 125 (a) Show that there is no Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium (PBE) in which player 1 always reveals the true value to player 2. (b) Find a PBE in which player 1 reports "high" if the project is worth $200, "low" if the project is worth $0 (and either “low" or "high" when the project is worth $100, figure out which one works). (c) Find another PBE (or, if you believe there are no others, explain).