Answered: Using the terms from each group, you… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

Using the terms from each group, you must compose a 1-2 sentence statement which CONNECTS all 3 terms in such a way that a TRUE statement is expressed

GROUP 7
1. JURISDICTION (Chapter 2)
2. OUT-OF-STATE DEFENDANT (Chapter 3)
3. FORESEEABLE INJURY (Chapter 3)

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

Please don't give image format
Describe the purpose and role of the manager in mediating disputes between parties, and explain the basic structure, elements, and strategies involved in mediating conflicts between parties (min. 100 words)
Sample Question and Answer: Question: James was elderly, disabled, and afflicted with very bad arthritis. One day, his 20 year-old neighbor pulled James’s chair out from under James. The girl said she didn’t mean to hurt him. James was not amused and sued the girl for damages. Will James likely be successful? Yes_____ No_____ Reason [Please state the rule(s) of law and your analysis] Answer: James would likely win for the tort of battery which is the intentional harmful or offensive touching of another (the “rule of law”). Analysis: Jokes and pranks are capable of resulting in battery. The chair was pulled out intentionally, which caused offensive contact between James’s body and the floor, in that, the chair was arguably within James’s zone of personal bodily integrity and, thus, an extension of his body. The fact that James was not physically injured is irrelevant. All that matters is that the girl intended the act or knew with substantial certainty of the consequences…
44.
please choose the most correct anwser.
During an embezzlement trial, the plaintiff’s attorney is performing a direct examination of a witness. The attorney asks the witness, “What happened when you asked your supervisor what they knew about the incident?” The witness replies, “my supervisor said that Mr. Smith had embezzled money from the company.” Smith is the sole defendant in the case. Which of the following is the most accurate statement concerning the witness’s response? A. The witness’s response is hearsay, but it is admissible because a hearsay exception applies. B. The witness’s response is not hearsay, and it is admissible. C. The witness’s response is not hearsay, but it is inadmissible because it is unreliable. D. The witness’s response is inadmissible hearsay
5. A radio station plays a commercial for Beefy's restaurant. The station created the commercial by loved Beefy's. The star didn't give permission for this commercial and has never even been to Beefy A. The radio station is guilty of appropriation B. The radio station is guilty of slandering the restaurant. C. The star is guilty of negligent misrepresentation, although not intentional misrepresentation. D. The radio station is guilty of negligence Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page) << Previous Question Next Su
Give typed explanation Kawal, a young mother with three small children, had worked at the counter of a Tim Hortons store for three years. One day, the manager observed Kawal giving a Timbit donut to a crying child who came into the store with their parents. When the manager of the store confronted Kawal about giving a donut away for free, Kawal immediately admitted to giving the donut away to the customer without paying for it. She was aware that this was against the employer’s policy, but she had been busy at the time and did not go to her purse to get the $1.50 to pay for the donut at that time. Also, knowing that day-old donuts are given away to small children in the store regularly, she felt this would be acceptable. Kawal expected to get a warning at most and was shocked when her manager terminated her employment for cause. Sarah filed a wrongful dismissal case. (PLEASE NOTE: I am not looking for your opinion. Use concepts discussed in class or your textbook to provide an…
Use the following 6-section format for the brief and analysis of federal trade commission v. check investors inc (2007): Support for case: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-3rd-circuit/1325043.html What should be included: Case Citation Statement of Facts Issue (Question) Rule (Statement of the Law) Application Conclusion
Fraudulent misrepresentation requires Multiple Choice. choose correct option and explain and also explain incorrect option Note - I am not satisfy give downvote • Maliciousness and repugnant intent •Negligent disregard for the truth •Reckless disregard for the truth •Scienter
Which of the following is NOT true of criminal fraud cases? A. It is easier for the prosecution to prevail in a criminal case than it is for the plaintiff to prevail in a civil case. B. Juries generally must rule unanimously on guilt. C. The burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. D. The government/prosecution has the burden of proof.
Question 2 Which of the following is a true statement? A. As a general rule, if the Statute of Frauds requires a contract to be evidenced by a writing an oral contract will be unenforceable. B. The â€œpart performanceâ€ exception to the Statute of Frauds may permit an oral contract for the sale of land to be enforced merely if part of the purchase price is paid. C. A mortgage represents an interest in personal property and thus can be oral. D. A contract for lifetime employment must be in writing to be enforceable since usually if will be for a long time. Question 4 Which of the following is true regarding Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act in the workplace? a. The plaintiff employee must always prove a malicious, wrongful intent to discriminate on the part of the defendant employer against the employee to prevail in a Title VII civil rights lawsuit. b. Only “big” employers with 2000 or more employees are covered by the federal Title…

SEE MORE QUESTIONS