The Lineweaver - Burk plot (Figure 1) shows an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in the absence andpresence of 0.1µM inhibitor (ketoconazole).O Estimate Vmax and Km in the absence and presence of the inhibito..(ii) Determine the type of inhibition shown by the inhibitor. Explain.0.1-0.080.06 -With inhibitor0.040.02Without inhibitor0.4 -0.2-0.020.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.01/{S\(&M-1)1/vo (pmol-11 min)

In a lineweaver burk plot, x intercept represents the negative reciprocal of Km and y axis…

Answered: The Lineweaver - Burk plot (Figure 1)…

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)

11th Edition

ISBN:9780134580999

Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please answer A & B attached with image.
You are working on an enzyme that obeys standard Michaelis-Menten kinetics. What variable is the V, dependant on if the concentration of the substrate is substantially higher than the concentration of the enzyme? [S] [E] [ES] O [P] O not enough information provided
An enzyme catalyzes a reaction with a K of 7.50 mM and a Vmax of 4.15 mMs. Calculate the reaction velocity, o, for each substrate concentration. [S] = 1.75 mM MM-s-1 [S] = 7.50 mM [S] = 11.0 mM DO mM-s mM-s
Based on the Lineweaver-Burke plot attached. Kinetic data were generated in the (1) absence of any inhibitor, (2) presence of 15 µM of a reversible inhibitor, or (3) presence of 20 µM of a second (distinct) reversible inhibitor. Purified enzyme concentration was 5 µM. The y-intercept of Lines (A) and (B) is 0.9 sec/uM; the y-intercept of Line (C) is 0.3 sec/uM. The slope of Line (A) is 1.8 sec; the slope of Lines (B) and (C) is 0.6 sec. Calculate the Km of the reaction represented by Line (B).
(i) Which graph indicates an enzymatic reaction without inhibitor?(ii) Which type of inhibitor is it? Briefly explain.(iii) Which graph indicates the highest concentration of inhibitor?(iv) Calculate the Vmax and Km of the graph showing an enzymatic reaction with the lowest concentration of inhibitor. Show the steps of calculation and unit in your answers. Keep 2 decimal places in your answers.
Chymotrypsin is an enzyme that is optimized to function in the small intestine (at a pH of ~7.4). Explain, given what you know about the chymotrypsin mechanism and what we learned about acid/base chemistry, why chymotrypsin would not be able to initiate catalysis if it were secreted into the stomach (pH ~2.5).
Based on the Lineweaver-Burke plot attached. Kinetic data were generated in the (1) absence of any inhibitor, (2) presence of 15 µM of a reversible inhibitor, or (3) presence of 20 µM of a second (distinct) reversible inhibitor. Purified enzyme concentration was 5 µM. The y-intercept of Lines (A) and (B) is 0.9 sec/uM; the y-intercept of Line (C) is 0.3 sec/uM. The slope of Line (A) is 1.8 sec; the slope of Lines (B) and (C) is 0.6 sec. QUESTION: Line (A) represents ____________. A. an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in the absence of any inhibitor. B. an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in the presence of a competitive inhibitor. C. an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in the presence of an uncompetitive inhibitor. D. an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in the presence of a noncompetitive, or mixed, inhibitor.
The Lineweaver-Burke plot was originally developed in order to "linearize" the data obtained from enzyme kinetics experiments, in order to facilitate the determination of kinetic parameters. Why is it not considered to be an accurate method for this purpose? It is very difficult to draw a straight line on a computer. It is very difficult to calculate the variables required for the "x" and "y" axis. It is more accurate to use the standard "V versus [S]" plot to determine Vmax and KM- The plot weights the least accurate data points the most heavily. It is no longer considered to be acceptable to extrapolate from known data.
Using the appropriate graph and table above, explain what the R48C mutation appears to be doing to the enzyme’s function. Discuss the kinetic parameter changes and their meaning in this context, not the structure of the enzyme, which was not given to you.
The Michaelis-Menten rate equation for reversible mixed inhibition is written as Vo Vmax [S] aKm + a' [S] where Vo is initial velocity, Vmax is maximum velocity, [S] is substrate concentration, a represents the effect of the inhibitor bound to free enzyme (E), a' represents the effect of the inhibitor bound to the enzyme-substrate complex (ES), and Km is the Michaelis constant that represents the [S] at which the reaction reaches Vmax Apparent, or observed, K is equivalent to the [S] at which Vo max Derive an expression for the effect of a reversible inhibitor on apparent K from the previous equation. Use the alphabet tab to enter a and the basic tab to enter the prime sign in your answer. apparent Km =
The following data was obtained during kinetic analysis of an enzyme with and without an inhibitor. Substrate concentration (mM) Reaction rate without inhibitor (µM/s) Reaction rate with inhibitor (µM/s) 10 28 12 20 50 23 40 83 42 60 107 58 100 139 83 200 179 125 300 197 150 400 209 167 560 227 197 How do you calculate the KM for the enzyme in the absence of an inhibitor. And how do you calculate kcat with the given enzymatic concentration of 5 µM.
The KM values for the reaction of chymotrypsin with two different substrates are given in the table below. Considering this information, which substrate has the lower apparent affinity for the enzyme? Which substrate is likely to give a lower value for Vmax? Substrate N-acetylvaline ethyl ester N-acetyltyrosine ethyl ester KM (M) 8.8 X 10-² 6.6 X 10-4 N-acetylvaline ethyl ester has the lower apparent affinity for the enzyme; it will also likely to give a lower Vmax: N-acetyltyrosine ethyl ester has the lower apparent affinity for the enzyme; it will also likely to give the lower V₁ max. N-acetylvaline ethyl ester has the lower apparent affinity for the enzyme; N- acetyltyrosine ethyl ester is likely to give the lower Vmax: N-acetyltyrosine ethyl ester has the lower apparent affinity for the enzyme; N- acetylvaline will likely to give the lower Vmax. None of the above statements are correct.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)

Biology

ISBN:

9780134580999

Author:

Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Publisher:

PEARSON

Biology 2e

Biology

ISBN:

9781947172517

Author:

Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark

Publisher:

OpenStax

Anatomy & Physiology

Biology

ISBN:

9781259398629

Author:

McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter

Publisher:

Mcgraw Hill Education,

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)

Biology

ISBN:

9780134580999

Author:

Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Publisher:

PEARSON

Biology 2e

Biology

ISBN:

9781947172517

Author:

Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark

Publisher:

OpenStax

Anatomy & Physiology

Biology

ISBN:

9781259398629

Author:

McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter

Publisher:

Mcgraw Hill Education,

Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)

Biology

ISBN:

9780815344322

Author:

Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter

Publisher:

W. W. Norton & Company

Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology

Biology

ISBN:

9781260159363

Author:

Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.

Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)

Biology

ISBN:

9781260231700

Author:

Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht

Publisher:

McGraw Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

The Lineweaver - Burk plot (Figure 1) shows an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in the absence and presence of 0.1µM inhibitor (ketoconazole). O Estimate Vmax and Km in the absence and presence of the inhibito.. (i) Determine the type of inhibition shown by the inhibitor. Explain. 0.1