Table 17-1 Imagine a small town in which only two residents, Celia and Venya, own wells that produce safe drinking water. Each week Celia and Venya work together to decide how many gallons of water to pump. They bring the water to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Celia and Venya can pump as much water as they want without cost so that the marginal cost of water equals zero. The town's weekly demand schedule and total revenue schedule for water is shown in the following table: Quantity Price Total Revenue and Total (Gallons) (Dollars per gallon) Profit (Dollars) 36 33 30 27 24 40 1,320 2,400 3,240 3,840 4,200 4,320 4,200 3,840 3,240 2,400 1,320 80 120 160 200 21 240 18 280 15 320 12 360 9. 400 6. 3 440 480 Refer to Table 17-1. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Celia and Venya from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of water once Celia and Venya reach a Nash equilibrium? O a. $12 O b. $15 O. $9 O d. $18

Table 17-1 Imagine a small town in which only two residents, Celia and Venya, own wells that produce safe drinking water. Each week Celia and Venya work together to decide how many gallons of water to pump. They bring the water to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Celia and Venya can pump as much water as they want without cost so that the marginal cost of water equals zero. The town's weekly demand schedule and total revenue schedule for water is shown in the following table: Quantity Price Total Revenue and Total (Gallons) (Dollars per gallon) Profit (Dollars) 36 33 30 27 24 40 1,320 2,400 3,240 3,840 4,200 4,320 4,200 3,840 3,240 2,400 1,320 80 120 160 200 21 240 18 280 15 320 12 360 9. 400 6. 3 440 480 Refer to Table 17-1. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Celia and Venya from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of water once Celia and Venya reach a Nash equilibrium? O a. $12 O b. $15 O. $9 O d. $18

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) Firm X 130 165 220…
Consider the market illustrated in the figure to the right. Supply curve S₁ represents the private cost of production and demand curve D₁ represents the private benefit from consumption. Suppose consumption of this good creates a positive externality. Show how the externality affects the market. 1.) Use the line drawing tool to draw either a new supply (S₂) or demand (D₂) curve incorporating the positive externality in consumption. Properly label this line. 2.) Use the point drawing tool to indicate the market equilibrium price and quantity. Label this point 'Market equilibrium'. 3.) Use the point drawing tool to indicate the efficient equilibrium price and quantity. Label this point 'Efficient equilibrium'. Carefully follow the instructions above, and only draw the required objects. Price Quantity S₁ D₁ N
There are two firms, A and B emitting sulfur dioxide. In total, they emit 100 tons of sulfur dioxide. The EPA wants to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by 60 tons so that the final level of emissions in only 40 tons. The table below shows the emissions and cost of abatement for each firm. If the EPA were to issue 40 tradeable pollution permits, 20 to each firm, where each pollution permit allows 1 ton of emission, what would the final allocation of permits across the two firms be if they traded permits with esch other? sO, Emission Cost per ton of so, reduction Company Firm A 30 tons $1,000 per ton Firm B 70 tons $800 per ton Total Emissions 100 tons Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arow keys to select an answer. a Each firm will have 20 permits. b. Firm A will have all 40 permits. Firm A will have 30 permits and Firm B will have 10 permits. Firm A will have 10 permits and Firm B will have 30 permits.
Consider the following decision by two countries: a small country (C1) and a large country (C2). When both countries cooprate and agree to an environmental agreement, C1 receives 4 and C2 receives 5 units of benefit. When they do not cooperae, they incur costs of -1, and -2, respectively. The payoffs associated with other outcomes are described in the table below. Large country (C2) Agree to environmental protection (cooperate) Do not agree to environmental protection (do not cooperate) The Socially Optiomal outcome is The Nash Equilibrium is Agree to environmental protection (cooperate) C1:4 C2: 5 C1: 2 C2: 6 [Choose ] Small country (C1) [Choose ] Do not agree to environmental protection (do not cooperate) C1:2 C2: -3 C1: -1 C2: -2
Spring is here, and Manuel and his grandfather would like to go fishing for the weekend in Florida. Manuel could either go to the lake in town where anyone can fish without a permit, or he could drive up to a pond located on his family's property in the countryside to fish. Assume that, no matter where people fish, all of the fish that are caught would be kept (that is, there is no "catch and release" policy). The fish in the lake are considered and whereas the fish in the private pond are and . In other words, the fish in the lake are an example of , and the fish in the private pond are an example of . Fishing in the lake will likely lead to because of which of the following reasons? Nobody will enjoy fishing because of the lack of private contributions to the maintenance of the lake. Anyone can fish in the lake, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success. All fishermen will…
Consider a lake found in the town of Center Barnstead, and then answer the questions that follow. The town has a campground whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The town also has a fish cannery that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the fish cannery's waste decreases the campground's economic profit. Suppose that the fish cannery could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the campground would no longer be affected. If the fish cannery uses the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the fish cannery does not use the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized…
suppose the campus of a university with 1,000 students lies along a street which is one mile long. There are two restaurants that sell pizza by the slice, and they are located at opposite ends of the campus street. Each restaurant can produce a slice of pizza for $1.00 (marginal cost) and the quality of the pizza from the two restaurants is identical. After classes, each student would like to buy one slice of pizza (as long as it costs less than $5.00), but they are evenly distributed along the university campus street and each needs to choose which direction to walk to get pizza. They have a constant disutility of having to walk such that they are willing to pay $2.00 per mile to avoid walking. (You can ignore the presence of other restaurants and assume that students choose between only these two.) 1. If these restaurants simultaneously set prices to maximize profits, what prices will each restaurant set in equilibrium? (You don’t need to derive the equilibrium prices here if you are…
Suppose two utilities, People's Electric and Municipal Energy, each produce 300 tons of pollution per year. The government has a goal of eliminating half the pollution, and, in turn, provides 150 pollution permits to each utility. A pollution permit is required to legally produce a ton of pollution. However, the two utilities are allowed to trade permits. Suppose the cost of eliminating one ton of pollution for People's Electric is $100 and the cost of eliminating a ton of pollution for Municipal Energy is $50. The total cost of each utility eliminating 150 tons of pollution is $22,500 (Enter your response as a whole number.) If the two utilities buy and sell permits with each other, then the minimum cost of eliminating 300 tons of pollution is $. (Enter your response as a whole number.)
Suppose the government is trying to determine how to deal with pesticide contamination of its water supply. It wants to undertake a benefit-cost analysis of two alternative policy options for controlling pesticides: Upgrade its municipal water treatment plant to remove the pesticides, or Banning the use of the offending pesticides in the metropolitan area. Assume that either techniques reduces pesticides to a level which does not adversely affect human health. The cost of these control options are as follows: Municipal treatment upgrades: Capital Costs = $9 million. The new plant is constructed over one year. It starts operating at the beginning of year two. Once the plant begins operation, it has operating costs of $1 million per year. Once constructed, the plant lasts for 5 years, then it must be replaced with a new plant. Pesticide Ban: Annual operating costs due to substitution of non-toxic methods of controlling “pests” = $4 million per year. These costs would last forever. The…
For Questions 26 and 27, assume that two different coastal cities are competing to have their location selected by the Federal Government to build a Major Deepwater Shipping Port for large container ships. The cost to build the port and more highway access is $200MM but the city that gets project will get $16MM in fees per year as well as jobs for 3,600 people. City A spends $1,280,000 on lobbyists, presentations and trips to Washington, D.C. to try to win the project and City B spends $1,180,000 to try to win. The Total loss to Society of the entire process of selecting & building the Shipping Port is: $202,460,000 $186,460,000 $200,000,000 $16,000,000
Acres Sophia Amber Cedric 1 $12 $24 $6 2 8 18 3 10 4 3 8 3 1 6. 2 6 4 1 7 2 Consider the town of Springfield with only three residents, Sophia, Amber, and Cedric (see the Table). The three residents are trying to determine how large, in acres, they should build the public park. Suppose the cost to build the park is $12 per acre and that the residents have agreed to split the cost of building the park equally. If the residents vote to determine the size of park to builo basing their decision solely on their own willingness to pay (and trying to maximize their own surplus), what is the largest park size for which the majority of residents would vote "yes?" 1 acre 2 acres 3 acres 4 acres
Suppose the government is trying to determine how to deal with pesticide contamination of its water supply. It wants to undertake a benefit-cost analysis of two alternative policy options for controlling pesticides: Upgrade its municipal water treatment plant to remove the pesticides, or Banning the use of the offending pesticides in the metropolitan area. Assume that either techniques reduces pesticides to a level which does not adversely affect human health. The cost of these control options are as follows: Municipal treatment upgrades: Capital Costs = $9 million. The new plant is constructed over one year. It starts operating at the beginning of year two. Once the plant begins operation, it has operating costs of $1 million per year. Once constructed, the plant lasts for 5 years, then it must be replaced with a new plant. Pesticide Ban: Annual operating costs due to substitution of non-toxic methods of controlling “pests” = $4 million per year. These costs would last forever. The…