Table 17-1 Imagine a small town in which only two residents, Celia and Venya, own wells that produce safe drinking water. Each week Celia and Venya work together to decide how many gallons of water to pump. They bring the water to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Celia and Venya can pump as much water as they want without cost so that the marginal cost of water equals zero. The town's weekly demand schedule and total revenue schedule for water is shown in the following table: Quantity Price Total Revenue and Total (Gallons) (Dollars per gallon) Profit (Dollars) 36 33 30 27 24 40 1,320 2,400 3,240 3,840 4,200 4,320 4,200 3,840 3,240 2,400 1,320 80 120 160 200 21 240 18 280 15 320 12 360 9. 400 6. 3 440 480 Refer to Table 17-1. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Celia and Venya from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of water once Celia and Venya reach a Nash equilibrium? O a. $12 O b. $15 O. $9 O d. $18

Table 17-1 Imagine a small town in which only two residents, Celia and Venya, own wells that produce safe drinking water. Each week Celia and Venya work together to decide how many gallons of water to pump. They bring the water to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Celia and Venya can pump as much water as they want without cost so that the marginal cost of water equals zero. The town's weekly demand schedule and total revenue schedule for water is shown in the following table: Quantity Price Total Revenue and Total (Gallons) (Dollars per gallon) Profit (Dollars) 36 33 30 27 24 40 1,320 2,400 3,240 3,840 4,200 4,320 4,200 3,840 3,240 2,400 1,320 80 120 160 200 21 240 18 280 15 320 12 360 9. 400 6. 3 440 480 Refer to Table 17-1. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Celia and Venya from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of water once Celia and Venya reach a Nash equilibrium? O a. $12 O b. $15 O. $9 O d. $18

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods: Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government issues tradable pollution permits. The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms. Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C First Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 90 55 650 Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of…
Please all solve the question
Van and Amy each rent one unit of a two-unit apartment building. The building has two separate furnaces located between the two apartments. The renters each control and pay for the heat their furnaces generate and would choose to increase the temperature of their apartments by 45 degrees if the other never turned on their furnace, given that the marginal private benefit (MB) of the 45th degree is equal to the marginal cost (MC) of 1 degree of heat (assume that the MC of heat is constant and that the MB of heat is decreasing). However, each degree of heat paid for by one not only raises the temperature in that apartment by a degree but also raises the temperature in the other apartment by half a degree. As a result, if Amy were to buy 40 degrees of heat, then Van would need to purchase only benefit of the final degree was equal to the marginal cost. Use the blue line (circle symbol) to plot Van's best-response function (BRF) on the following graph, with the total amount of heat he will…
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) Firm X 90 125 180…
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) Firm X 130 165 220…
Jonathan, Scott and Mitchell share a garage. All enjoy having the garage cleaned, regardless of who pays for cleaning. The graph below represents Jonathan, Scott and Mitchell’s individual demand for garage cleaning. The marginal cost of cleaning $3 per hour. The Lindahl prices for Jonathan, Scott and Mitchell are, respectively, $68/17, $17/17, and $4/85 per hour. $34/17, $17/17, and $0 per hour. None of these. $30/17, $15/17, $6/17 per hour. $0, $0, and $0 per hour.
There are two firms, A and B emitting sulfur dioxide. In total, they emit 100 tons of sulfur dioxide. The EPA wants to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by 60 tons so that the final level of emissions in only 40 tons. The table below shows the emissions and cost of abatement for each firm. If the EPA were to issue 40 tradeable pollution permits, 20 to each firm, where each pollution permit allows 1 ton of emission, what would the final allocation of permits across the two firms be if they traded permits with esch other? sO, Emission Cost per ton of so, reduction Company Firm A 30 tons $1,000 per ton Firm B 70 tons $800 per ton Total Emissions 100 tons Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arow keys to select an answer. a Each firm will have 20 permits. b. Firm A will have all 40 permits. Firm A will have 30 permits and Firm B will have 10 permits. Firm A will have 10 permits and Firm B will have 30 permits.
Parks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.
Spring is here, and Manuel and his grandfather would like to go fishing for the weekend in Florida. Manuel could either go to the lake in town where anyone can fish without a permit, or he could drive up to a pond located on his family's property in the countryside to fish. Assume that, no matter where people fish, all of the fish that are caught would be kept (that is, there is no "catch and release" policy). The fish in the lake are considered and whereas the fish in the private pond are and . In other words, the fish in the lake are an example of , and the fish in the private pond are an example of . Fishing in the lake will likely lead to because of which of the following reasons? Nobody will enjoy fishing because of the lack of private contributions to the maintenance of the lake. Anyone can fish in the lake, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success. All fishermen will…
Many highways have designated car pool or highoccupancy lanes. Generally, only cars containing at least two people can use these lanes. Single drivers are fined heavily if they are caught using these lanes. With new technologies, it is possible to charge drivers using car pool lanes by recording identifying markings on the car and billing the owners. Would allowing single drivers to pay to use car pool lanes increase economic efficiency? Explain.
There is another entire part of this lesson. Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount it costs each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of the other firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.) Firm Initial Pollution Permit Allocation Action Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated Cost of Pollution Reduction (Units of pollution) (Units of pollution) (Dollars) Firm A 2 Firm B 2 Firm C 2
Suppose there is a public park. The annual cost of maintenance is $200,000. Visiting the park is free, and it is visited 210,000 times every year. However, to fund better maintenance of the park, the government wants to make visitors pay $4.70 per visit. Implementing a security system (to prevent visitors from sneaking into the park) will cost $0.50 per visit and $260,000 in annual fixed expenditures. At the same time, maintenance costs are expected to rise by 23%, not including security costs. The number of visits to the park is expected to fall by 34%