Consider a river found in the city of Philadelphia, and then answer the questions that follow. The city has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the river for recreation. The city also has a chemical plant that dumps industrial waste into the river. This pollutes the river and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the chemical plant's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit. Suppose that the chemical plant could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the river to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the chemical plant uses the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $2,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $2,500 per week. If the chemical plant does not use the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $3,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,700 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table. Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Action Chem. Plant Hiking Lodge Total Recycle 3,000 1,700 ? No Recycle 2,500 2,500 ? Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is -- . When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $2,500−$1,700=$800$2,500−$1,700=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by $3,000−$2,500=$500$3,000−$2,500=$500 per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the river. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) river. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will -- the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge --- per week. Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the river, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will -- the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant --- per week. The chemical plant will make the most economic profit when --- . True or False: The river will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights.

Consider a river found in the city of Philadelphia, and then answer the questions that follow. The city has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the river for recreation. The city also has a chemical plant that dumps industrial waste into the river. This pollutes the river and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the chemical plant's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit. Suppose that the chemical plant could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the river to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the chemical plant uses the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $2,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $2,500 per week. If the chemical plant does not use the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $3,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,700 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table. Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Action Chem. Plant Hiking Lodge Total Recycle 3,000 1,700 ? No Recycle 2,500 2,500 ? Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is -- . When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $2,500−$1,700=$800$2,500−$1,700=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by $3,000−$2,500=$500$3,000−$2,500=$500 per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the river. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) river. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will -- the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge --- per week. Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the river, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will -- the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant --- per week. The chemical plant will make the most economic profit when --- . True or False: The river will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Consider a river found in the city of Philadelphia, and then answer the questions that follow.

The city has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the river for recreation. The city also has a chemical plant that dumps industrial waste into the river. This pollutes the river and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the chemical plant's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit.

Suppose that the chemical plant could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the river to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the chemical plant uses the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $2,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $2,500 per week. If the chemical plant does not use the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $3,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,700 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.

Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling.

Action	Chem. Plant	Hiking Lodge	Total
Recycle	3,000	1,700	?
No Recycle	2,500	2,500	?

Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is -- .

When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $2,500−$1,700=$800$2,500−$1,700=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by $3,000−$2,500=$500$3,000−$2,500=$500 per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week.

Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the river. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) river. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will -- the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge --- per week.

Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the river, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will -- the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant --- per week.

The chemical plant will make the most economic profit when --- .

True or False: The river will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights.

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 7 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.