Suppose that speeding imposes externalities on other people resulting in a social cost of $50. A town is considering hiring an extra police officer to give out speeding tickets. If we want to maximize social welfare (absent enforcement costs), which 13. of the following statements are true? (Assume risk neutral drivers.) If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 10%, then a a) speeding ticket should cost $55. If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 10%, then a b) speeding ticket should cost $500. If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 100%, then no one will speed. If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 90%, then a speeding ticket should cost $59 None of the above c) d) e)

Suppose that speeding imposes externalities on other people resulting in a social cost of $50. A town is considering hiring an extra police officer to give out speeding tickets. If we want to maximize social welfare (absent enforcement costs), which 13. of the following statements are true? (Assume risk neutral drivers.) If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 10%, then a a) speeding ticket should cost $55. If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 10%, then a b) speeding ticket should cost $500. If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 100%, then no one will speed. If the probability of detection with the extra police officer is 90%, then a speeding ticket should cost $59 None of the above c) d) e)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

No AI and plss I beg
A polluter has abatement costs given by MAC = 405-0.15E, and the emissions cause damages given by MD = 0.1E. The government has a law that requires the polluter to pay for damages they cause, but they will only have to pay if the government catches the polluter emitting. If the polluter knows there is only a 68% chance that the government will catch the polluter, and they choose their optimal emission level, how much total damage will they cause? Answer: 30 The correct answer is: $ 172570.7
Please answer both parts I do not understand, thank you :) Part A. Suppose that the rats on the campus of Hypothetical U are found to be carriers of a plague. Eradicating the rats has an estimated cost of $1,000,000 and is expected to reduce the probability a given student dies of the plague from 1/2,000 to zero. Suppose that there are 30,000 students on campus. Suppose further that the administration refuses to eradicate the rats due to the cost. From this information, we can estimate that the administration’s willingness to pay to save a student statistical life is less than $1,000,000 $33,333.3 $100,000 $66,666.7 Part B: Suppose a company offers a standard insurance contract with a premium (r) of $1,000 and a payout (q) of $8,000. Suppose that Rock earns a healthy state income of $50,000, a sick state income of $20,000, and has a 10% chance of becoming ill. From this information, you can determine that the expected profit for the insurance company is…
2ii
#4. Without a vaccine, there is a 10% chance that Steven will get the coronavirus in 2021. If he gets vaccinated, that risk falls to 1%. Without a vaccines, Steven gets -6000 utils if he gets covid and 0 utils if he stays healthy. Because of side effects, he gets -100 utils from the vaccine if he stays healthy and -6100 if he gets sick anyways. What will Steven do? a. He will get vaccinated b. He will not get vaccinated c. He will get vaccinated if he is risk-averse but not if he is risk-loving d. He will get vaccinated if he is risk-loving but not if he is risk-averse
1 pending
Could Question 13 be answered?