equilibrium

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Consider two firms who are engaged in a Research and Development (R&D) "con-
test". Both firms simultaneously expend resources to try to win the contest (which
may mean developing a superior product or developing a product before the com-
petitor). If the two firms expend bị and b2, respectively, on R&D, the probability
that firm 1 wins the contest is
if b1 = b2 =0
BE otherwise
P1(b1, b2) =
where r is some exogenous constant, r E (0, 0). If firm 1 wins the contest, it will
subsequently earn revenue of 1 (not including the cost of R&D, b1). If firm 1
loses the contest, it will earn zero revenue, and thus lose bj in total. Hence, firm
l's expected profit is n'(b1,b2) = p1(b1,b2) - b1. Everything is symmetric for
firm 2.
i. How does p1(b1,0) depend on b1? Is it an equilibrium for both firms to
spend nothing on R&D (b1 = b2 = 0)? Prove and explain your answer. For
which values of r is n' (b,b2) concave in b1 when b2 > 0?
ii. Consider the possibility of a symmetric pure-strategy equilibrium. Assum-
ing such an equilibrium exists, derive it and prove it is unique. Is the equi-
librium efficient? Under what conditions onr do a symmetric pure-strategy
equilibrium exists? Prove and explain your answers.
iii. Assume r = 1 and that firm 2 observes firm 1's expenditures before it has
to make its own investment. Derive the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium.
How does it differ from the equilibrium in the simultaneous-move game? Is
there a first-mover advantage in this game? Does firm 2 prefer the sequential
game or the simultaneous game?
iv. Assume r = 2. Does firm 2 have a unique best response to all bi E (0, 00)?
Is there an equilibrium of the sequential game in which firm 1 invests more
than in the simultaneous-move game? If firm 1 invests less than in
simultaneous game, does firm 2 invest more or less than firm 1? Describe
an equilibrium of the sequantial game and compare it to the equilibrium
of the simultanous game. Does firm 1 prefer the sequential game or the
simultaneous game? How about firm 2? Prove and explain your answers.
Transcribed Image Text:Consider two firms who are engaged in a Research and Development (R&D) "con- test". Both firms simultaneously expend resources to try to win the contest (which may mean developing a superior product or developing a product before the com- petitor). If the two firms expend bị and b2, respectively, on R&D, the probability that firm 1 wins the contest is if b1 = b2 =0 BE otherwise P1(b1, b2) = where r is some exogenous constant, r E (0, 0). If firm 1 wins the contest, it will subsequently earn revenue of 1 (not including the cost of R&D, b1). If firm 1 loses the contest, it will earn zero revenue, and thus lose bj in total. Hence, firm l's expected profit is n'(b1,b2) = p1(b1,b2) - b1. Everything is symmetric for firm 2. i. How does p1(b1,0) depend on b1? Is it an equilibrium for both firms to spend nothing on R&D (b1 = b2 = 0)? Prove and explain your answer. For which values of r is n' (b,b2) concave in b1 when b2 > 0? ii. Consider the possibility of a symmetric pure-strategy equilibrium. Assum- ing such an equilibrium exists, derive it and prove it is unique. Is the equi- librium efficient? Under what conditions onr do a symmetric pure-strategy equilibrium exists? Prove and explain your answers. iii. Assume r = 1 and that firm 2 observes firm 1's expenditures before it has to make its own investment. Derive the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. How does it differ from the equilibrium in the simultaneous-move game? Is there a first-mover advantage in this game? Does firm 2 prefer the sequential game or the simultaneous game? iv. Assume r = 2. Does firm 2 have a unique best response to all bi E (0, 00)? Is there an equilibrium of the sequential game in which firm 1 invests more than in the simultaneous-move game? If firm 1 invests less than in simultaneous game, does firm 2 invest more or less than firm 1? Describe an equilibrium of the sequantial game and compare it to the equilibrium of the simultanous game. Does firm 1 prefer the sequential game or the simultaneous game? How about firm 2? Prove and explain your answers.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 37 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Equilibrium Point
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education