equilibrium

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Consider two firms who are engaged in a Research and Development (R&D) "con-
test". Both firms simultaneously expend resources to try to win the contest (which
may mean developing a superior product or developing a product before the com-
petitor). If the two firms expend bị and b2, respectively, on R&D, the probability
that firm 1 wins the contest is
if b1 = b2 =0
BE otherwise
P1(b1, b2) =
where r is some exogenous constant, r E (0, 0). If firm 1 wins the contest, it will
subsequently earn revenue of 1 (not including the cost of R&D, b1). If firm 1
loses the contest, it will earn zero revenue, and thus lose bj in total. Hence, firm
l's expected profit is n'(b1,b2) = p1(b1,b2) - b1. Everything is symmetric for
firm 2.
i. How does p1(b1,0) depend on b1? Is it an equilibrium for both firms to
spend nothing on R&D (b1 = b2 = 0)? Prove and explain your answer. For
which values of r is n' (b,b2) concave in b1 when b2 > 0?
ii. Consider the possibility of a symmetric pure-strategy equilibrium. Assum-
ing such an equilibrium exists, derive it and prove it is unique. Is the equi-
librium efficient? Under what conditions onr do a symmetric pure-strategy
equilibrium exists? Prove and explain your answers.
iii. Assume r = 1 and that firm 2 observes firm 1's expenditures before it has
to make its own investment. Derive the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium.
How does it differ from the equilibrium in the simultaneous-move game? Is
there a first-mover advantage in this game? Does firm 2 prefer the sequential
game or the simultaneous game?
iv. Assume r = 2. Does firm 2 have a unique best response to all bi E (0, 00)?
Is there an equilibrium of the sequential game in which firm 1 invests more
than in the simultaneous-move game? If firm 1 invests less than in
simultaneous game, does firm 2 invest more or less than firm 1? Describe
an equilibrium of the sequantial game and compare it to the equilibrium
of the simultanous game. Does firm 1 prefer the sequential game or the
simultaneous game? How about firm 2? Prove and explain your answers.
Transcribed Image Text:Consider two firms who are engaged in a Research and Development (R&D) "con- test". Both firms simultaneously expend resources to try to win the contest (which may mean developing a superior product or developing a product before the com- petitor). If the two firms expend bị and b2, respectively, on R&D, the probability that firm 1 wins the contest is if b1 = b2 =0 BE otherwise P1(b1, b2) = where r is some exogenous constant, r E (0, 0). If firm 1 wins the contest, it will subsequently earn revenue of 1 (not including the cost of R&D, b1). If firm 1 loses the contest, it will earn zero revenue, and thus lose bj in total. Hence, firm l's expected profit is n'(b1,b2) = p1(b1,b2) - b1. Everything is symmetric for firm 2. i. How does p1(b1,0) depend on b1? Is it an equilibrium for both firms to spend nothing on R&D (b1 = b2 = 0)? Prove and explain your answer. For which values of r is n' (b,b2) concave in b1 when b2 > 0? ii. Consider the possibility of a symmetric pure-strategy equilibrium. Assum- ing such an equilibrium exists, derive it and prove it is unique. Is the equi- librium efficient? Under what conditions onr do a symmetric pure-strategy equilibrium exists? Prove and explain your answers. iii. Assume r = 1 and that firm 2 observes firm 1's expenditures before it has to make its own investment. Derive the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. How does it differ from the equilibrium in the simultaneous-move game? Is there a first-mover advantage in this game? Does firm 2 prefer the sequential game or the simultaneous game? iv. Assume r = 2. Does firm 2 have a unique best response to all bi E (0, 00)? Is there an equilibrium of the sequential game in which firm 1 invests more than in the simultaneous-move game? If firm 1 invests less than in simultaneous game, does firm 2 invest more or less than firm 1? Describe an equilibrium of the sequantial game and compare it to the equilibrium of the simultanous game. Does firm 1 prefer the sequential game or the simultaneous game? How about firm 2? Prove and explain your answers.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 37 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Equilibrium Point
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education