Sample Progress Report PROGRESS REPORT *Stratigraphic Architecture of Deep-Ramp Carbonates: Implications for Deposition of Volcanic Ashes, Salona and Coburn Formations, Central Pennsylvania" by John Lerner SCOPE AND PURPOSE The Late Middle Ordovician-age Salona and Coburn formations of central Pennsylvania show cyclic patterns on a scale of tens of meters. Little research has been done on sequence stratigraphy of deep- water mixed carbonate/siliciclastic systems, and a depositional model for this environment is necessary to understand the timing and processes of deposition. The stratigraphic position of the bentonites at the base of the larger cycles is significant because it indicates that they accumulated during a time of non- deposition in a deep water environment. PROGRESS To date, I have described five lithofacies present in the Salona and Coburn formations. Two lithofacies are interpreted as storm deposits and make up the limestone component of the thinly-bedded couplets. Some trends were observed in the raw data; however, because of the “noisy" nature of the data, a plot of the five-point moving average of bed thickness was created to define the cycles better. ADDITIONAL WORK Two key tasks are to be completed in the coming weeks. With the results of these tests and the field observations, I will create a model for deposition of a deep-ramp mixed carbonate/siliciclastic system in a foreland basin environment. The model will include depositional processes, stratigraphic architecture, and tectonic setting. REMAINING QUESTIONS Questions remain regarding the depositional processes responsible for the featureless micrite at the base of the Salona Formation. How rapid was the transition? What record (if any?) remains of the transition? Were bentonites not deposited, or were they selectively removed at certain locations by erosive storm processes? EXPECTED RESULTS 1 expect to find that the large-scale cycles represent parasequences. Flooding surfaces are marked by bentonites and shales, with bentonites removed in some locations. If the cycles are true parasequences, the implication is that eustatic sea level changes and not tectonic influences controlled the depositional changes over the interval.

icon
Related questions
Question
Directions: Read the attached Progress Report. Answer the following questions as briefly as possible. 1. What is the text all about? 2. Who/What are its target audience/subject? 3. What is the author's purpose for writing the text? 4. Describe its structure based on the parts or format of report writing. 5. What kind of writing is it in terms of purpose and content?
Sample Progress Report
PROGRESS REPORT
FStratigraphic Architecture of Deep-Ramp Carbonates: Implications for Deposition of Volcanic Ashes,
Salona and Coburn Formations, Central Pennsylvania"
by John Lerner
SCOPE AND PURPOSE
The Late Middle Ordovician-age Salona and Coburn formations of central Pennsylvania show cyclic
patterns on a scale of tens of meters, Little research has been done on sequence stratigraphy of deep-
water mixed carbonate/siliciclastic systems, and a depositional model for this environment is necessary
to understand the timing and processes of deposition. The stratigraphic position of the bentonites at the
base of the larger cycles is significant because it indicates that they accumulated during a time of non-
deposition in a deep water environment.
PROGRESS
To date, I have described five lithofacies present in the Salona and Coburn formations. Two lithofacies
are interpreted as storm deposits and make up the limestone component of the thinly-bedded couplets.
Some trends were observed in the raw data; however, because of the “noisy" nature of the data, a plot of
the five-point moving average of bed thickness was created to define the cycles better.
ADDITIONAL WORK
Two key tasks are to be completed in the coming weeks. With the results of these tests and the field
observations, I will create a model for deposition of a deep-ramp mixed carbonate/siliciclastic system in
a foreland basin environment. The model will include depositional processes, stratigraphic architecture,
and tectonic setting.
REMAINING QUESTIONS
Questions remain regarding the depositional processes responsible for the featureless micrite at the base
of the Salona Formation. How rapid was the transition? What record (if any?) remains of the transition?
Were bentonites not deposited, or were they selectively removed at certain locations by erosive storm
processes?
EXPECTED RESULTS
1 expect to find that the large-scale cycles represent parasequences. Flooding surfaces are marked by
bentonites and shales, with bentonites removed in some locations. If the cycles are true parasequences,
the implication is that eustatic sea level changes and not tectonic influences controlled the depositional
changes over the interval.
Transcribed Image Text:Sample Progress Report PROGRESS REPORT FStratigraphic Architecture of Deep-Ramp Carbonates: Implications for Deposition of Volcanic Ashes, Salona and Coburn Formations, Central Pennsylvania" by John Lerner SCOPE AND PURPOSE The Late Middle Ordovician-age Salona and Coburn formations of central Pennsylvania show cyclic patterns on a scale of tens of meters, Little research has been done on sequence stratigraphy of deep- water mixed carbonate/siliciclastic systems, and a depositional model for this environment is necessary to understand the timing and processes of deposition. The stratigraphic position of the bentonites at the base of the larger cycles is significant because it indicates that they accumulated during a time of non- deposition in a deep water environment. PROGRESS To date, I have described five lithofacies present in the Salona and Coburn formations. Two lithofacies are interpreted as storm deposits and make up the limestone component of the thinly-bedded couplets. Some trends were observed in the raw data; however, because of the “noisy" nature of the data, a plot of the five-point moving average of bed thickness was created to define the cycles better. ADDITIONAL WORK Two key tasks are to be completed in the coming weeks. With the results of these tests and the field observations, I will create a model for deposition of a deep-ramp mixed carbonate/siliciclastic system in a foreland basin environment. The model will include depositional processes, stratigraphic architecture, and tectonic setting. REMAINING QUESTIONS Questions remain regarding the depositional processes responsible for the featureless micrite at the base of the Salona Formation. How rapid was the transition? What record (if any?) remains of the transition? Were bentonites not deposited, or were they selectively removed at certain locations by erosive storm processes? EXPECTED RESULTS 1 expect to find that the large-scale cycles represent parasequences. Flooding surfaces are marked by bentonites and shales, with bentonites removed in some locations. If the cycles are true parasequences, the implication is that eustatic sea level changes and not tectonic influences controlled the depositional changes over the interval.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer