Question 2: An investor has been received three major investment proposals and he would like to choose one. The first one is a conservative investment that would perform very well in an improving economy and only suffer a small loss in a worsening economy. The second is a speculative investment that would perform extremely well in an improving economy but would do very badly in a worsening economy. The third is a countercyclical investment that would lose some money in an improving economy but would perform well in a worsening economy. The investor believes that there are three possible scenarios over the lives of these potential investments: (1) an improving economy, (2) a stable economy, and (3) a worsening economy. He is pessimistic about where the economy is headed, and so has assigned prior probabilities of 0.1, 0.5, and 0.4, respectively, to these three scenarios. He also estimates that his profits under these respective scenarios are those given by the following table. Conservative investment Speculative investment Countercyclical investment Prior probability Improving Economy 30 million USD 40 million USD -10 million USD 0.1 Stable Economy 5 million USD 10 million USD 0 0.5 Worsening Economy -10 million USD -30 million USD 15 million USD 0.4 Which investment should Warren make under each of the following criteria? a. Maximax criterion. b. Maximin criterion. c. Maximum likelihood criterion. d. Bayes' decision rule. e. The investor decides that Bayes' decision rule is his most reliable decision criterion. He believes that 0.1 is just about right as the prior probability of an improving economy, but is quite uncertain about how to split the remaining probabilities between a stable economy and a worsening economy. Therefore, he now wishes to do some sort of sensitivity analysis with respect to these latter two prior probabilities. If he still wants to choose the alternative from the Bayes' decision rule (part d): e1. How much would be the maximum amount of the prior probability of a stable economy? e2. How much would be the minimum amount of the prior probability of a worsening economy?

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question
Which investment should Warren make under each of the following criteria? a. Maximax criterion. b. Maximin criterion. c. Maximum likelihood criterion. d. Bayes’ decision rule. e. The investor decides that Bayes’ decision rule is his most reliable decision criterion. He believes that 0.1 is just about right as the prior probability of an improving economy, but is quite uncertain about how to split the remaining probabilities between a stable economy and a worsening economy. Therefore, he now wishes to do some sort of sensitivity analysis with respect to these latter two prior probabilities. If he still wants to choose the alternative from the Bayes’ decision rule (part d): e1. How much would be the maximum amount of the prior probability of a stable economy? e2. How much would be the minimum amount of the prior probability of a worsening economy?
Question 2:
An investor has been received three major investment proposals and he would like to choose
one. The first one is a conservative investment that would perform very well in an improving
economy and only suffer a small loss in a worsening economy. The second is a speculative
investment that would perform extremely well in an improving economy but would do very
badly in a worsening economy. The third is a countercyclical investment that would lose some
money in an improving economy but would perform well in a worsening economy.
The investor believes that there are three possible scenarios over the lives of these potential
investments: (1) an improving economy, (2) a stable economy, and (3) a worsening economy.
He is pessimistic about where the economy is headed, and so has assigned prior probabilities
of 0.1, 0.5, and 0.4, respectively, to these three scenarios. He also estimates that his profits
under these respective scenarios are those given by the following table.
Conservative investment
Speculative investment
Countercyclical investment
Prior probability
Improving
Economy
30 million USD
40 million USD
-10 million USD
0.1
Stable Economy
5 million USD
10 million USD
0
0.5
Worsening
Economy
-10 million USD
-30 million USD
15 million USD
0.4
Which investment should Warren make under each of the following criteria?
a. Maximax criterion.
b. Maximin criterion.
c. Maximum likelihood criterion.
d. Bayes' decision rule.
e. The investor decides that Bayes' decision rule is his most reliable decision criterion. He
believes that 0.1 is just about right as the prior probability of an improving economy, but is
quite uncertain about how to split the remaining probabilities between a stable economy and
a worsening economy. Therefore, he now wishes to do some sort of sensitivity analysis with
respect to these latter two prior probabilities. If he still wants to choose the alternative from
the Bayes' decision rule (part d):
e1. How much would be the maximum amount of the prior probability of a stable economy?
e2. How much would be the minimum amount of the prior probability of a worsening
economy?
Transcribed Image Text:Question 2: An investor has been received three major investment proposals and he would like to choose one. The first one is a conservative investment that would perform very well in an improving economy and only suffer a small loss in a worsening economy. The second is a speculative investment that would perform extremely well in an improving economy but would do very badly in a worsening economy. The third is a countercyclical investment that would lose some money in an improving economy but would perform well in a worsening economy. The investor believes that there are three possible scenarios over the lives of these potential investments: (1) an improving economy, (2) a stable economy, and (3) a worsening economy. He is pessimistic about where the economy is headed, and so has assigned prior probabilities of 0.1, 0.5, and 0.4, respectively, to these three scenarios. He also estimates that his profits under these respective scenarios are those given by the following table. Conservative investment Speculative investment Countercyclical investment Prior probability Improving Economy 30 million USD 40 million USD -10 million USD 0.1 Stable Economy 5 million USD 10 million USD 0 0.5 Worsening Economy -10 million USD -30 million USD 15 million USD 0.4 Which investment should Warren make under each of the following criteria? a. Maximax criterion. b. Maximin criterion. c. Maximum likelihood criterion. d. Bayes' decision rule. e. The investor decides that Bayes' decision rule is his most reliable decision criterion. He believes that 0.1 is just about right as the prior probability of an improving economy, but is quite uncertain about how to split the remaining probabilities between a stable economy and a worsening economy. Therefore, he now wishes to do some sort of sensitivity analysis with respect to these latter two prior probabilities. If he still wants to choose the alternative from the Bayes' decision rule (part d): e1. How much would be the maximum amount of the prior probability of a stable economy? e2. How much would be the minimum amount of the prior probability of a worsening economy?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.