Answered: Lorenz Curve would shift closer to the…

Lorenz Curve would shift closer to the 45-degree reference line. shift closer to Economy B's Lorenz Curve. not shift at all

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

= The $1.4 billion trick to make us accept income inequality Lotteries take money from the poor and redistribute it unequally. The poor, the uneducated, and minorities play the lottery the most, and it takes a big chunk of their income. Source: The Huffington Post, January 12, 2016 If the news clip is correct, how does a lottery change the distribution of income? Draw two Lorenz curves to illustrate your answer. CID Lotteries result in the distribution of income OA. becoming more unequal OB. becoming more equal OC. remaining unchanged Draw the Lorenz curve in a country that does not have lotteries. Label it Before. Draw the Lorenz curve for the country after the introduction of lotteries. Label it After. >>> To reposition the label click on the cross by the label box and drag it. Cumulative percentage of income 100- 80- 60- 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative percentage of households >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question. 40- 20-
Draw the line of equality. 100- Draw a Lorenz curve for the distribution of income and label it. >>> Reposition the label by clicking on the edge of the label box and dragging it. 80- Draw a Lorenz curve for the distribution of wealth and. Label it. 60- 40- A household's point in time. A household's is the value of the things that it owns at a 20- is the amount that the household receives over a given period of time. C OA. wealth; income B. estate; revenue OC. estate; salary OD. fortune; revenue Cumulative percentage of income and wealth 0+ 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative percentage of households (100,0) >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question.
The closer the Lorenz curve for income is to the line of equality, the larger is the nation's total income. the smaller is the nation's total income. the more equally are incomes distributed. the larger the fraction of the nation's income received by the richest families.
To combat income inequality and to generate increased tax revenues to fund expenditures, government officials decide to aggressively increase how progressive income taxes are, so much so that the top income earners are marginally taxed 90% of their income (and while this marginal tax rate may seem oppressive, these top income earners still have more than enough income to satisfy all of their needs and all but the most extravagant of wants - basically, these earners have more than enough money). Argue why this tax policy is a fair approach to fund government expenditures. Why might this tax policy fail to achieve its objectives (tax revenues would actually decline as a result)?
1. An economy's Lorenz Curve reveals that an economy's highest income quintile has 65% of the economy's income while the lowest income quintile only has 5% of the economy's income. Solely based on the Lorenz Curve, is this distribution of income fair? Why or why not? 2. To combat income inequality and to generate increased tax revenues to fund expenditures, government officials decide to aggressively increase how progressive income taxes are, so much so that the top income earners are marginally taxed 90% of their income (and while this marginal tax rate may seem oppressive, these top income earners still have more than enough income to satisfy all of their needs and all but the most extravagant of wants - basically, these earners have more than enough money). Argue why this tax policy is a fair approach to fund government expenditures. Why might this tax policy fail to achieve its objectives (tax revenues would actually decline as a result)?
Explain Lorenz curve in short witha diagram
To reduce income inequality, should the marginal tax rates on the top 1% be increased?
Suppose that the economy of Loserville has the following distribution of income: first quintile 15% of aggregate income second quintile 20% of aggregate income third quintile 20% of aggregate income fourth quintile 20% of aggregate income fifth quintile 25% of aggregate income a. From the information provided, please derive a Lorenz Curve for Loserville. Show graphically. b. From the Lorenz Curve you have drawn, find the Gini Coefficient. c. How does Loserville compare to the United States economy?
Incomes in China and India are a small fraction of incomes in the United States. But incomes in China and India are growing more quickly those in the United States. Draw the world Lorenz curve before the growth in income in China and India. Label it Before. >>> Reposition the label by clicking on the edge of the label box and dragging it. Draw the world Lorenz curve after the growth in income in China and India. Label it After. Inequality between the people in China and India and the people in the United States is O A. increasing OB. staying relatively constant C. decreasing OD. increasing in some years and decreasing in other years % 5 6 Selected: none Oll 87 & 7 O * 8 O 100- 80- 60- 40- 20- 0 Cumulative percentage of income ( 9 20 40 80 60 Cumulative percentage of households >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question. Delete Clear * ? ) 0 Next x 10 an rld" it fe dust real- lesto SITI Oriente 1 C++ ( Camp.o NS 1 ye Coding hool Stu Mihailescu NS 2 year. ython - Fu ers [Tutoria…
A. Explain the concepts of the 'Lorenz curve' and 'Gini coefficient'. In answering this question, explain the difference between a flatter Lorenz curve and a bent concave Lorenz curve (i.e., pointing to the right of a diagram). B. List and discuss two policies for reducing poverty,
Consider a society consisting of two people. Jacques earns an income of $100,000 per year and Kyoko earns an income of $30,000 per year. The government is considering a redistribution plan that would impose a 25% tax on Jacques's income and give the revenue to Kyoko. Without any incentive distortion, Jacques would retain $75,000 and Kyoko would end up with $55,000. However, let us assume that since Jacques will not receive all the income he earns, he decides to work less and earn an income of only $90,000, of which 25%×$90,000=$22,50025%×$90,000=$22,500 will be owed in taxes. With the redistribution plan, Jacques will take home an income of . The $22,500 that Jacques pays in taxes will be transferred by the government to Kyoko. Let us assume that since Kyoko now receives payment from the government, she will not work as many hours and will earn an income from work of only $29,000 instead of her initial $30,000. With the redistribution plan, Kyoko's total income…
TRUE or FALSE 64. Public policy is essential in solving poverty at the local and national levels. 65. Solving poverty has to be done from macroeconomic and microeconomic levels. 66. The Kuznets Curve is a graphical presentation of the relationship between the Gini coefficient and GNI per capita