The table shows after-tax income shares in Canada in 1986 and 2015. After-tax income After-tax income 1986 2015 (percent of total) Households Lowest 20 percent Second 20 percent Middle 20 percent Fourth 20 percent Highest 20 percent 5 11 18 25 41 7 13 18 23 39 Draw a point to show the income earned by the lowest 20 percent of households in 1986. Draw a point to show the income earned by the lowest 60 percent of households in 1986. Draw a Lorenz curve that is consistent with the two points you've plotted. Canadian after-tax income is distributed equally in 2015 than in 1986. 100 90- 80+ 70- 60- 50+ 40- 30- 20 10- 04 0 Cumulative percentage of income Q 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Cumulative percentage of households >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question. G

The table shows after-tax income shares in Canada in 1986 and 2015. After-tax income After-tax income 1986 2015 (percent of total) Households Lowest 20 percent Second 20 percent Middle 20 percent Fourth 20 percent Highest 20 percent 5 11 18 25 41 7 13 18 23 39 Draw a point to show the income earned by the lowest 20 percent of households in 1986. Draw a point to show the income earned by the lowest 60 percent of households in 1986. Draw a Lorenz curve that is consistent with the two points you've plotted. Canadian after-tax income is distributed equally in 2015 than in 1986. 100 90- 80+ 70- 60- 50+ 40- 30- 20 10- 04 0 Cumulative percentage of income Q 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Cumulative percentage of households >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question. G

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

For Question 7 please refer to the chart below of the Lorenz Curve for Paraguay and Germany for 2014: Percent of Total Income Paraguay -Germany Percent of Total Population Based on the table above, which of the following is true; Paraguay has a greater degree of Income Inequality Germany has a lower Gini-Coefficient Paraguay has a higher Gini-Coefficient Germany has a greater degree of Income Inequality
Ma1. Using diagrams, discuss the following aspects of income inequality. Draw two different Lorenz Curves, LCA & LCB, where the two curves cross. Discuss and compare the two in terms of the Top 1% Share.
8. Four students have yearly incomes of $5,000, $15,000, $20,000, and $60,000. a. Make a table of the Lorenz Curve and use the Trapezoidal Rule with 4 trapezoids to find the area under the Lorenz Curve. Your answer should be correct to 2 places after the decimal point. The area under the Lorenz Curve is b. Use the results of Part a to find the Gini Index. Your answer should be correct to 2 places after the decimal point. The Gini Index is
The $1.4 billion trick to make us accept income inequality Lotteries take money from the poor and redistribute it unequally. The poor, the uneducated, and minorities play the lottery the most, and it takes a big chunk of their income Source: The Huffington Post, January 12, 2016 If the news clip is correct, how does a lottery change the distribution of income? Draw two Lorenz curves to illustrate your answer. Lotteries result in the distribution of income Draw the Lorenz curve in a country that does not have lotteries. Label it Before Draw the Lorenz curve for the country after the introduction of lotteries. Label it After >>> To reposition the label click on the cross by the label box and dragging it 100 80 60 40- 20 Cumulative percentage of income 100 20 40 60 00 Cumulative percentage of households >>>Draw only the objects specified in the question G
1. An economy's Lorenz Curve reveals that an economy's highest income quintile has 65% of the economy's income while the lowest income quintile only has 5% of the economy's income. Solely based on the Lorenz Curve, is this distribution of income fair? Why or why not? 2. To combat income inequality and to generate increased tax revenues to fund expenditures, government officials decide to aggressively increase how progressive income taxes are, so much so that the top income earners are marginally taxed 90% of their income (and while this marginal tax rate may seem oppressive, these top income earners still have more than enough income to satisfy all of their needs and all but the most extravagant of wants - basically, these earners have more than enough money). Argue why this tax policy is a fair approach to fund government expenditures. Why might this tax policy fail to achieve its objectives (tax revenues would actually decline as a result)?
3. Comparing Gini coefficients of different countries Aa Aa The following diagram shows the Lorenz curves for three countries. Country X's Lorenz curve is shown in blue, Country Y's Lorenz curve is shown in red, and Country Z's Lorenz curve is shown in green. Region I is the area above Country X's Lorenz curve and below the 45-degree line. Region II is the area below Country X's Lorenz curve and above Country Y's Lorenz curve. Region III is the area below Country Y's Lorenz curve and above Country Z's Lorenz curve. Region IV is the area below Country Z's Lorenz curve. INCOME (Cumulative percent) 100 80 60 40 20 0 The Gini coefficient for Country Z is given by Couny X 20 Country Y Country Z 11 III 60 IV 40 100 HOUSEHOLDS (Cumulative percent) 80 has the highest Gini coefficient.
1. Income inequality and the poverty rate The following table summarizes the income distribution for the town of Perkopia, which has a population of 10,000 people. Every individual within an income group earns the same income, and the total annual income in the economy is $500,000,000. Suppose that in 2007, the poverty line is set at an annual income of $42,350 for an individual. Year Lowest Quintile Second Quintile 2001 2007 2013 2019 3.0 3.4 3.8 5.0 Share of Total Income in Perkopia (Percent) 8.6 9.4 9.7 11.0 The data in the table suggest that there was Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile 14.0 14.6 15.2 15.5 21.9 22.4 22.9 25.0 Highest Quintile 52.5 50.2 48.4 43.5 income inequality from 2001 to 2019. MacBook Pro Complete the following table to help you determine the poverty rate in Perkopia in 2007. To do this, begin by determining the total income of all individuals in each quintile using the fact that total annual income in the economy is $500,000,000. Next, determine the income of an…
Suppose that the economy of Loserville has the following distribution of income: first quintile 15% of aggregate income second quintile 20% of aggregate income third quintile 20% of aggregate income fourth quintile 20% of aggregate income fifth quintile 25% of aggregate income a. From the information provided, please derive a Lorenz Curve for Loserville. Show graphically. b. From the Lorenz Curve you have drawn, find the Gini Coefficient. c. How does Loserville compare to the United States economy?
Question One The figure below shows three alternative distributions of land ownership in a village with people and 100 hectares of land. a. Draw the Lorenz curves for each case. 10 points b. For cases I and III, calculate the Girl 10 points c For case il, show on the Lorenz curve diagram how the Gini coefficient can be calculated. 5 points Question One The figure below shows three alternative distributions of land ownership in a village with 10 people and 100 hectares of land. a. Draw the Lorenz curves for each case. b. For cases I and III, calculate the Gini c. For case II, show on the Lorenz curve diagram how the Gini coefficient can be calculate 80 people own nothing 20 people own 5 hectares each 40 people own nothing 40 people own 20 people own 1 hectare each 3 hectares each 100 people own 1 hectare each
The table shows the distribution of income in the Australia Complete the column of the table that records the cumulative percentages of income in Australia received by the cumulative percentages of households. Cumulative percentage of Income Households Lowest 20 percent (percentage) Households Income 8 Lowest 20 13 Lowest 40 Second 20 percent Third 20 percent 18 Fourth 20 percent 23 Highest 20 percent 38 Lowest 60 Lowest 80 100 100.0 The graph shows the Lorenz curve for the United States Draw the line of equality Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 40 percent of Australian households Label it 1, Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 80 percent of Australian households. Label it 2 Draw the Lorenz curve for Australia. Label it Based on the data provided, which country has the more unequal income distribution? OA Australa OB. Neither. They have the same degree of inequality. OC, The United States OD. It…
Consider the Lorenz curves for income for Deneb and Elnath as shown in this figure: Lorenz curves for Deneb and Elnath cumullative income share (%) 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 100 90 80 70 60 40 30 Lorenz curve for Elnath 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 income percentiles Lorenz curve for Deneb [If the image above doesn't appear click here to open it in a new tab.] Which of the following statements is true? [Hint: You do not need to calculate any areas to answer this question correctly!] The relative income inequalities of Deneb and Elnath cannot be determined from the information given. Income inequality is more extreme in Deneb than it is in Elnath. Deneb and Elnath have the same degree of income inequality. Income inequality is more extreme in Elnath than it is in Deneb.
Using the above Lorenz Curve, answer the following questions. . . Approximately what percentage of the income does the richest 20% of Country A earn? Approximately what percentage of the income does the poorest 20% of Country B earn? If the government of Country B increased the progressivity of income taxes, would its Lorenz Curve move closer to the 45-degree reference line, closer to Country A's Lorenz Curve, or not move at all?