In many professions, leaders have to confront very complex challenges and the results can fall well below everyone's expectations. The downfall of GE portrays situations where bad decision making led to insurmountable problems and the fall of the CEO and the senior leadership team. In your professional life, you may be subjected to many complex problems. A critical assessment of the four frames can make the difference between success and failure. To prepare for this assignment, read the following article (and any other ones related to GE's demise) in order to construct the "big picture" that will allow you to conduct your analysis: Colvin, G. (2018). What the hell happened? Fortune 177 (6). P. 148-156. https://nl.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=129673759&site=ehost-live&scope=site Directions: Identify the frame(s) used by Immelt in GE's situations (i.e., Structure, HR, Political, and Symbolic). Review the choice of frames made by Immelt in those situations. Based on decisions made, explain if the downfall occurred due to choosing the wrong frame, an incorrect application of a given frame, or for other reasons. If you were the person chosen to succeed the former CEO, recommend what other frame(s) you would have considered in the decision-making process. For your recommendations, take into account the external environment as a factor in decision-making.  Justify your answer using the characteristics of each frame from your readings. Describe how Immelt's leadership was effective or ineffective using the four images of reframing leadership.