If a risk-neutral individual owns a home worth $200,000 and there is a three percent chance the home will be destroyed by fire in the next year, then we know 15. that: a) He is willing to pay much more than $6,000 for full cover. b) He is willing to pay much less than $6,000 for full cover. c) He is willing to pay at most $6,000 for full cover. d) None of the above are correct. e) All of the above are correct.

If a risk-neutral individual owns a home worth $200,000 and there is a three percent chance the home will be destroyed by fire in the next year, then we know 15. that: a) He is willing to pay much more than $6,000 for full cover. b) He is willing to pay much less than $6,000 for full cover. c) He is willing to pay at most $6,000 for full cover. d) None of the above are correct. e) All of the above are correct.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Monty Burns, the owner of the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant, owns many real estate properties. His last acquisition is a house worth €1,000, 000. Monty Burns considers purchasing an insurance for this new property. With probability 0.1, he will face damage reducing his property' value to €640,000 while with probability 0.9 his property will not be damaged and thus will remain at its current value. Burns' vNM utility for wealth is given by u°(w) = Vw. Miss b runs an insurance company in Springfield and is willing to insure Monty Burns. The insurance contract says the following: if Burns' new property is damaged, she will pay an amount q (the coverage) to Monty Burns in exchange for a payment r (the premium) that is due independently from the occurence of the damage. Miss b's vNM utility over her income y is u°(y) = y.
MB, MC 10- 8. 6 4 2. Reference: Ref 16-2 O MB, Select one: A. III B. I MC MB₁ MB3 (Figure 16.2) Lilly, who owns the Cigar Bar and Grill, is considering whether to purchase fire insurance. Without insurance, the marginal benefit of precautions to reduce the risk of fire is given by MB₁. Which of the following statements is (are) TRUE? I. With full insurance, the marginal benefit of acting to reduce the risk of fire is given by MB3. C. II D. I and III 10 II. If Lilly purchases fire insurance, whether it is full or partial coverage, the marginal benefits of acting to reduce the risk of fire will increase. Quantity of actions taken to improve fire protection III. With partial insurance, the marginal benefit of acting to reduce the risk of fire is given by MB₂.
A risk-averse consumer with $100,000 in wealth faces 0.1 probability of losing half of his wealth within the next year. a. What is the consumer's expected wealth one year from now? b. An insurance company offers our consumer full insurance against the possible loss. What premium must the consumer be charged for the insurance company to expect to break even? c. Suppose our risk-averse consumer is indifferent between getting $85,000 wealth with certainty and facing the above described uncertain situation. What is the maximum premium that the insurance company will be able to charge this consumer for its full insurance policy?
4. A taproom owner is trying to determine how to structure his manager's compensation. One option he considers is a flat salary of $70,000 per year. The second option is a base salary of $30,000 plus 15% of the taproom's profit. If the manager puts a lot of effort into her job, the taproom's annual profit will be $500,000 with 75% probability and $100,000 with 25% probability. If the manager exerts only modest effort, the taproom's profit will be $500,000 with 25% probability and $100,000 with 75% probability. The manager's opportunity cost of putting a lot of effort into her job is $50,000, while her opportunity cost of exerting only modest effort is $25,000. a. Draw the game tree for the interaction between the taproom owner and the manager. Assume that the taproom owner moves first. b. What is the equilibrium outcome for this game? What kind of contract should the taproom owner offer? What level of effort will the manager choose? Explain.
Exercise 5: Insurance Consider two individuals, Dave and Eva. Both Dave and Eva have initial wealth 810,000 and face a 40% chance of losing L = 450, 000. Dave has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function up(x) = x and Eva has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function ug (x) = VT. 1. What do you know about Dave's and Eva's risk preferences? 2. What is the most Dave would be willing to pay for complete insurance against the loss? 3. What is the most Eva would be willing to pay for complete insurance against the loss? Suppose they are each able choose insurance with any coverage level z [0, 1] (i.e. 0 0. 6. Is Eva's optimal choice full insurance, i.e. z = 1?