You are pondering whether to buy insurance for your new car. The car is worth $50,000. Apart from that, your wealth sums up to $40,000. Your utility takes the form u(w) = √w. There is 0.5% chance that your car will be stolen. With the insurance in place, you will get fully reimbursed if this tragedy happens. (a) If the insurance premium is $400, would you buy the insurance? (b) What is the largest premium you are willing to pay for the car insurance? (c) If your utility is instead given by u(w) = log(w), how does your answer to part (2) change?

You are pondering whether to buy insurance for your new car. The car is worth $50,000. Apart from that, your wealth sums up to $40,000. Your utility takes the form u(w) = √w. There is 0.5% chance that your car will be stolen. With the insurance in place, you will get fully reimbursed if this tragedy happens. (a) If the insurance premium is $400, would you buy the insurance? (b) What is the largest premium you are willing to pay for the car insurance? (c) If your utility is instead given by u(w) = log(w), how does your answer to part (2) change?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The value of a successful project is $420,000; the probabilities of success are 1/2 with good supervision and 1/4 without. The manager is risk neutral, not risk averse as in the text, so his expected utility equals his expected income minus his disutility of effort. He can get other jobs paying $90,000, and his disutility for exerting the extra effort for good supervision on your project is $100,000. (a) Show that inducing high effort would require the firm to offer a compensation scheme with a negative base salary; that is, if the project fails, the manager pays the firm an amount stipulated in the scheme. (b) How might a negative base salary be implemented in reality? (c) Show that if a negative base salary is not feasible, then the firm does better to settle for the low-pay, low-effort situation.
You have a net worth of $901395 and a utility function given by u(w) = w0.5. If your house %3! catches fire, a 3% likelihood of occurring, you expect it to be total loss and it was recently assessed at $792999. What is the risk premium ($) you'd be willing to pay for full coverage against this fire risk? Hints: Compute the certainty equivalent (CEQ) as you did in Comm 220 and recall that the risk premia is the amount you'd be willing to pay over the expected loss Answer:
In a large casino, the house wins on its blackjack tables with a probability of 50.9%. All bets at blackjack are 1 to 1, which means that if you win, you gain the amount you bet, and if you lose, you lose the amount you bet. a. If you bet $1 on each hand, what is the expected value to you of a single game? What is the house edge? b. If you played 150 games of blackjack in an evening, betting $1 on each hand, how much should you expect to win or lose? c. If you played 150 games of blackjack in an evening, betting $3 on each hand, how much should you expect to win or lose? d. If patrons bet $7,000,000 on blackjack in one evening, how much should the casino expect to earn? a. The expected value to you of a single game is $ (Type an integer or a decimal.)
In the Hawaiian Beach Boy surf board vendor scenario, what if the fine was increased to $190 but the probability of a fine decreased to one in 20 days, 5%? What would be the expected value – Exp(RS) -- of continuing to rent surfboards? Assume the other numbers stay the same. He makes $300/day and to rent boards from friends costs him $100 a day. So, he makes $200 a day. Write out the expected value formula, plug in the numbers, and show the math. Hint: the Exp(RS) should be higher than the previously calculated $160.
Thelma is indifferent between $100 and a bet with a 0.6 chance of no return and a 0.4 chance of $200. If U(0) = 20 and U(200) = 220, then U(100) = :
With reference to Fig. 5-3, if the individual's income is either OA = $30,000 with probability of 0.95 or OB = $5000, (a) what is the expected income of this individual? (b) What is the maximum amount of insurance that this individual would be willing to pay? %3D
help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working
David is an expected-utility maximizer that likes to drive fast (and reckless at times), so his probability of an accident is 2/3. David's preferences over wealth are u(w) = vw. Suppose that David's initial wealth is $100. If David has an accident, he incurs a $51 loss. How much is the risk premium David willing to pay to be as well off in case of accident or not?
Suppose that • The employee has an outside offer to work for $27 per hour, for 1500 hours per year The employee currently works for $20 per hour, for 2000 hours per year The switching cost can be either high ($1'000) or low ($50) • The high switching cost has probability 40%; the low switching cost 60% Suppose that the cost of losing the employee is $800. What is the employer expected payoff from choosing not to match the outside offer?
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?
Lucy, the manager of the medical test firm Dubrow Labs, worries about the firm being sued for botched results from blood tests. If it isn't sued, the firm expects to earn profit of $120, but if it is successfully sued, its profit will be only $20. Lucy believes that the probability of a successful suit is 20%. If fair insurance is available and Lucy is risk averse, how much insurance will she buy? Lucy will buy insurance that costs her $ when not successfully sued. (Enter your response as a whole number.)