Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow. The village has a boat tour whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a fish processor that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the fish processor's waste decreases the boat tour's economic profit. Suppose that the fish processor could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the boat tour would no longer be affected. If the fish processor uses the recycling method, then the fish processor's economic profit is $1,300 per week, and the boat tour's economic profit is $1,900 per week. If the fish processor does not use the recycling method, then the fish processor's economic profit is $1,600 per week, and the boat tour's economic profit is $1,100 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table. Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the fish processor's economic profit and the boat tour's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Action Profit Fish Processor Boat Tour Total (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) No Recycling 1,600 1,100 Recycling 1,300 1,900 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is . When the fish processor uses the recycling method, the boat tour earns $1,900−$1,100=$800$1,900−$1,100=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the boat tour should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the fish processor to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the fish processor's economic profit by $1,600−$1,300=$300$1,600−$1,300=$300 per week. Therefore, the fish processor should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $300 per week. Suppose the boat tour has the property rights to the lake. That is, the boat tour has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish processor will the recycling method and will pay the boat tour per week. Now, suppose the fish processor has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish processor will the recycling method, and the boat tour will pay the fish processor per week. The boat tour will make the most economic profit when . True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. True False

Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow. The village has a boat tour whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a fish processor that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the fish processor's waste decreases the boat tour's economic profit. Suppose that the fish processor could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the boat tour would no longer be affected. If the fish processor uses the recycling method, then the fish processor's economic profit is $1,300 per week, and the boat tour's economic profit is $1,900 per week. If the fish processor does not use the recycling method, then the fish processor's economic profit is $1,600 per week, and the boat tour's economic profit is $1,100 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table. Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the fish processor's economic profit and the boat tour's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Action Profit Fish Processor Boat Tour Total (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) No Recycling 1,600 1,100 Recycling 1,300 1,900 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is . When the fish processor uses the recycling method, the boat tour earns $1,900−$1,100=$800$1,900−$1,100=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the boat tour should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the fish processor to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the fish processor's economic profit by $1,600−$1,300=$300$1,600−$1,300=$300 per week. Therefore, the fish processor should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $300 per week. Suppose the boat tour has the property rights to the lake. That is, the boat tour has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish processor will the recycling method and will pay the boat tour per week. Now, suppose the fish processor has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish processor will the recycling method, and the boat tour will pay the fish processor per week. The boat tour will make the most economic profit when . True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. True False

Principles of Microeconomics

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305156050

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter11: Public Goods And Common Resources

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

8. The effects of property rights on achieving efficiency

Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow.

The village has a boat tour whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a fish processor that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the fish processor's waste decreases the boat tour's economic profit.

Suppose that the fish processor could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the boat tour would no longer be affected. If the fish processor uses the recycling method, then the fish processor's economic profit is $1,300 per week, and the boat tour's economic profit is $1,900 per week. If the fish processor does not use the recycling method, then the fish processor's economic profit is $1,600 per week, and the boat tour's economic profit is $1,100 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.

Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the fish processor's economic profit and the boat tour's economic profit combined) with and without recycling.

Action	Profit
Fish Processor	Boat Tour	Total
(Dollars)	(Dollars)	(Dollars)
No Recycling	1,600	1,100
Recycling	1,300	1,900

Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is .

When the fish processor uses the recycling method, the boat tour earns $1,900−$1,100=$800$1,900−$1,100=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the boat tour should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the fish processor to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the fish processor's economic profit by $1,600−$1,300=$300$1,600−$1,300=$300 per week. Therefore, the fish processor should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $300 per week.

Suppose the boat tour has the property rights to the lake. That is, the boat tour has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish processor will the recycling method and will pay the boat tour per week.

Now, suppose the fish processor has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish processor will the recycling method, and the boat tour will pay the fish processor per week.

The boat tour will make the most economic profit when .

True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights.

True

False

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.