8. The effects of property rights on achieving efficiency Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow. The village has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a tannery that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the tannery's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit. Aa Suppose that the tannery could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the tannery uses the recycling method, then the tannery's economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $2,800 per week. If the tannery does not use the recycling method, then the tannery's economic profit is $2,300 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,600 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table. Complete the tollowing table by computing the total protit (the tannery's economic protit and the hiking lodge's economic protit combined) with and without recycling. Profit Total Hiking Lodge Tannery (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) Action No Recycling 2,300 1,600 Recycling 1,500 2,800 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is When the tannery uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $2,800- $1,600=$1,200 more per week than does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $1,200 per week for the tannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the tannery's economic profit by $2,300-$1,500= $800 per week. Therefore, the tannery should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $800 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the tannery will the recycling method and willl pay the hiking lodge per week Now, suppose the tannery has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the tannery cost, the tannery will per week The tannery will make the most economic profit when True or False: The tannery will use the recycling method, regardless of who has the property rights.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
8. The effects of property rights on achieving efficiency
Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow.
The village has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the lake for
recreation. The village also has a tannery that dumps
industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and
makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the
tannery's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit.
Aa
Suppose that the tannery could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels
safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the tannery uses the recycling method, then the tannery's economic profit is
$1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $2,800 per week. If the tannery does not use the recycling method, then the tannery's
economic profit is $2,300 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,600 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.
Transcribed Image Text:8. The effects of property rights on achieving efficiency Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow. The village has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a tannery that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the tannery's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit. Aa Suppose that the tannery could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the tannery uses the recycling method, then the tannery's economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $2,800 per week. If the tannery does not use the recycling method, then the tannery's economic profit is $2,300 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,600 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.
Complete the tollowing table by computing the total protit (the tannery's economic protit and the hiking lodge's economic protit combined) with and
without recycling.
Profit
Total
Hiking Lodge
Tannery
(Dollars)
(Dollars)
(Dollars)
Action
No Recycling
2,300
1,600
Recycling
1,500
2,800
Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is
When the tannery uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $2,800- $1,600=$1,200 more per week than
does with no recycling.
Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $1,200 per week for the tannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases
the tannery's economic profit by $2,300-$1,500= $800 per week. Therefore, the tannery should be willing to use the recycling method if it is
compensated with at least $800 per week.
Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming
the two firms can bargain at no cost, the tannery will
the recycling method and willl pay the hiking lodge
per week
Now, suppose the tannery has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no
the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the tannery
cost, the tannery will
per week
The tannery will make the most economic profit when
True or False: The tannery will use the recycling method, regardless of who has the property rights.
Transcribed Image Text:Complete the tollowing table by computing the total protit (the tannery's economic protit and the hiking lodge's economic protit combined) with and without recycling. Profit Total Hiking Lodge Tannery (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) Action No Recycling 2,300 1,600 Recycling 1,500 2,800 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is When the tannery uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $2,800- $1,600=$1,200 more per week than does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $1,200 per week for the tannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the tannery's economic profit by $2,300-$1,500= $800 per week. Therefore, the tannery should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $800 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the tannery will the recycling method and willl pay the hiking lodge per week Now, suppose the tannery has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the tannery cost, the tannery will per week The tannery will make the most economic profit when True or False: The tannery will use the recycling method, regardless of who has the property rights.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education