Case Analysis. Read the cases given below and answer the questions for each case. Make sure that in answering you cite an ethical basis Ex: "Principles of Accountability further prove that the action was....." You will be graded accordingly and based on how you defend your answer. A rubrics is provided for your reference. All answers for the case analysis shall be written in a yellow pad paper. Case #1: Apple Inc. and Underaged workers Cunnie Guglielmo, a reporter for Bloomberg news services, begins an article on Apple this way: “Apple Inc. said three of its suppliers hired 11 underage workers to help build the iPhone, iPod and Macintosh computer last year, a violation it uncovered as part of its onsite audit of 102 factories." Her story adds details. The underage workers were fifteen in places where the minimum legal age for employment is sixteen. She wasn't able to discover the specific countries, but learned the infractions occurred in one or more of the following: China, Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, the Czech Republic, and the Philippines. Following the discovery, the employees were released, and disciplinary action was taken against a number of the foreign suppliers. In one case, Apple stopped contracting with the company entirely. The story closes with this: "Apple rose $2.62 to $204.62 yesterday in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares more than doubled last year." Questions: 1. The ethical question is whether Apple ought to contract (through suppliers) fifteen-year-olds to work on factory floors. Is the fact that the stock price has been zooming up a pertinent fact, or does it not affect the ethics? Explain. 2. Assume that in the countries where fifteen-year-olds were working, it's customary for children even younger to earn an adult-type living. a. What is an advantage of following the local customs when making economic decisions like the one confronting Apple? b. Does the custom of employing young workers in some countries change your consideration of the practice in those places? Why or why not? ethical