Both Wisconsin and Michigan border Lake Michigan. The lake is becoming polluted and both states are deciding whether or not to clean it. If Wisconsin decides to clean the lake it will cost 1200 and generate social benefits of 1500 – however, - Wisconsin will receive only 1100 of those social benefits while Michigan will receive the other 400. If Michigan cleans the lake, it will cost them 700 and generate social benefits of 900 – however, Michigan will receive only 600 of those benefits while Wisconsin will receive the remaining 300. If a state does not clean the lake, it experiences a cost of $0. If Wisconsin does not clean the lake and Michigan does then the payoffs will be Question 9 options: A) Wisconsin gains 200, Michigan gains 100 B) Wisconsin gains 300, Michigan loses 100 C) Wisconsin gains 300, Michigan gains 100 D) Wisconsin gains 200, Michigan loses 100

Both Wisconsin and Michigan border Lake Michigan. The lake is becoming polluted and both states are deciding whether or not to clean it. If Wisconsin decides to clean the lake it will cost 1200 and generate social benefits of 1500 – however, - Wisconsin will receive only 1100 of those social benefits while Michigan will receive the other 400. If Michigan cleans the lake, it will cost them 700 and generate social benefits of 900 – however, Michigan will receive only 600 of those benefits while Wisconsin will receive the remaining 300. If a state does not clean the lake, it experiences a cost of $0. If Wisconsin does not clean the lake and Michigan does then the payoffs will be Question 9 options: A) Wisconsin gains 200, Michigan gains 100 B) Wisconsin gains 300, Michigan loses 100 C) Wisconsin gains 300, Michigan gains 100 D) Wisconsin gains 200, Michigan loses 100

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The graph shows the unregulated market for electricity. Suppose that at every quantity produced, the marginal external cost of electricity equals the marginal private cost of production. To show the market outcome, draw the following four items on the graph: 1. Draw a point to show the marginal social cost when the utility produces 500 kilowatts per day. Label it 1. 2. Draw the marginal social cost curve. Label it MSC . 3. Draw a point to show the electricity produced and its marginal social cost. Label it 2. 4. Draw a shape to show the deadweight loss created. Label it DWL . >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question.
Use the following to answer questions 7-8: Figure: Positive Externalities and Production of Semiconductor Chips Price, marginal | social benefit of chip $55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Quantity of chips 7. (Figure: Positive Externalities and Production of Semiconductor Chips) If the marginal external benefit of producing a chip is $20, then the socially optimal quantity of chips is and the socially optimal price is A) 200; $20 B) 300; $25 C) 500; $35 D) 600; $40 8. (Figure: Positive Externalities and Production of Semiconductor Chips) If the socially optimal production of chips is 500, the government could achieve the socially optimal level of production by granting a Pigouvian subsidy of: A) $5. B) $10. C) $15.
Air pollution creates a negative externality—a cost suffered by a third party as a result of an economic transaction. A standard solution to a negative externality is a Pigouvian tax, a tax that raises the marginal private cost of pollution emissions to the level of the marginal social cost. The socially optimal quantity of pollution emissions is then determined by the intersection of the marginal private benefit, or demand, curve and the marginal social cost curve. The article notes that "putting a dollar value on the benefits of cleaner air has been difficult." Assuming this problem has been resolved, in the accompanying diagram, move the endpoints of line Smarginal social cost to show the marginal social cost curve. Then move the line labeled "Tax" to show the amount of the tax needed to limit emissions to the socially optimal level.
Parks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.
ЕOC 11.04 Consider two car factories, one run by Ford and the other run by Honda, that both create pollution. The government wants to reduce how much these two factories pollute by 40 tons, so only allow factories to pollute if they have a permit. Each factory is given 20 pollution permits. A business can use a permit to emit one ton of pollution or they can sell it to another business (and lose the ability to pollute). To lower pollution it costs Ford $200 per ton of pollutant removed and it costs Honda $100 per ton removed. After Ford and Honda have met to trade their permits with each other, what we expect to happen? Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. Honda emits 20 tons of pollutants and Ford emits 20 tons of pollutants. a Honda no longer pollutes and Ford does not lower how much it produces. Honda increases its pollution and Ford lowers its pollution. Ford no longer pollutes and Honda does not lower how much it…
Back to Assignment Attempts Keep the Highest / 2 9. Private solutions to correct for externalities Consider the following scenario: Suppose that a chicken farm uses a nearby stream to dispose of the wastes released by its chickens. These wastes flow downstream into a lake that has become thick with algae and polluted by the minerals in the waste matter. The local office of a nonprofit environmental organization collects enough donations to fund a campaign to stop the farm's pollution. Which of the following types of private solutions to the externality of pollution has occurred in this case? O Charities O Integration of different types of businesses through merger or acquisition O Moral codes and social sanctions O Contracts It's important to note that sometimes private solutions to externalities do not work. For example, this occurs when an excessive amount of time or money must be spent for parties to reach an agreement. This describes the problem of Grade It Now Save & Continue…
Save The market price of insecticide is initially $10 per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production K process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is put into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by $8 per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to $12 per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers? $ (Enter a numeric response using an integer.)
The graph illustrates the market for pesticide with no government intervention. When the factories produce pesticide, they also create waste, which they dump into a lake on the outskirts of town. The marginal external cost of the dumped waste is equal to the marginal private cost of producing pesticide (that is, the marginal social cost of producing the pesticide is double the marginal private cost.) What quantity of pesticide is produced if no one owns the lake? If no one owns the lake, the quantity of pesticide produced is tonnes a week. The efficient quantity of pesticide is tonnes a week. 480- 400- 320- 240- 160- 80- Price (dollars per tonne) 40 80 120 160 Quantity (tonnes of pesticide per week) S D 200 N
Refer to Figure. Which of the following statements is correct? Price 22 24 22 81 18 16 Social cost (private cost and external cost) Supply (private cost) Demand (private value) 120 160 Quantity a. The private cost of producing the 160th unit of output is $16 b. The social cost of producing the 160th unit of output is $22. c. d. The external cost of producing the 160th unit of output is $6. All of the above are correct.
4. Efficiency in the presence of externalities Cars impose many external costs on society: carbon dioxide emissions that contribute to air pollution, congestion on roadways, and so on. Therefore, the market quantity of cars is not equal to the efficient quantity. The following graph shows the private demand for cars, the private supply of cars, and the social supply of cars, which incorporates both private costs and external costs. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimum quantity. Note: Drop lines will extend to both axes automatically. DERIVATE QUARKET O5OCIAL SSOCIAL SPRVATE QUANTITY OF CARS From society's standpoint, the market is producing cars. This is an example of of resources. PRICE OF CARS
The market for some public good consists of only two consumers, Elena and Talia. The marginal cost of providing this good is described by MC = 3 + 5Q. Elena's MWTP = 40 - 3Q and Talia's MWTP = 10 - 2Q. What is the socially-efficient quantity of this good? Round to the nearest whole unit
What will a corrective tax equal to the external cost imposed on polluters result in? It will increase the level of pollution. It will force polluters to internalize the external cost resulting from their actions. It will eliminate all pollution. It will usually have NO impact whatsoever on pollution levels, but will generate tax revenue for the government.