A journalist gained the trust of a public employee involved in a corruption scandal to write an article about it. The journalist goes along with the employee, who provided the detail and information the journalist needed to write the article. The journalist and the employee made an agreement that the journalist would not publish information about the employee. The employee thought that the journalist was his friend, but the journalist published still the article, which exposed a large corruption scandal that had been going on for years. The employee was not named in the article as the source of the information but was arrested with others involved in the scandal following the publication of the article. The employee was also publicly attacked on social media and is unable to find employment. a. Was the way the journalist treated the employee acceptable? Why or why not? b. Should the employee have realized that talking to the journalist could result in the corruption being exposed? c. How is this case related to information privacy?

A journalist gained the trust of a public employee involved in a corruption scandal to write an article about it. The journalist goes along with the employee, who provided the detail and information the journalist needed to write the article. The journalist and the employee made an agreement that the journalist would not publish information about the employee. The employee thought that the journalist was his friend, but the journalist published still the article, which exposed a large corruption scandal that had been going on for years. The employee was not named in the article as the source of the information but was arrested with others involved in the scandal following the publication of the article. The employee was also publicly attacked on social media and is unable to find employment. a. Was the way the journalist treated the employee acceptable? Why or why not? b. Should the employee have realized that talking to the journalist could result in the corruption being exposed? c. How is this case related to information privacy?

Understanding Business

12th Edition

ISBN:9781259929434

Author:William Nickels

Publisher:William Nickels

Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

After reading Alberta's contributory negligence legislation, choose the statement below that is FALSE: Select one: O a. A person may be held liable for damage or loss even where that person's fault has not contributed to it. O b. The name of the legislation is the Contributory Negligence Act. Oc. The legislation indicates that certain questions in every action are questions of fact. Od. Where a person may be partly responsible for the damages claimed, but is not yet a party to the lawsuit, that party may be added as a defendant on such terms that are determined to be just.
Sam, a mid-level manager at his company, continually makes offensive remarks and gestures toward Susan, a non-manager at the company who works in another department. Susan quits her job and brings a lawsuit for sexual harassment. As a general rule under California law, the company Group of answer choices a. is strictly liable to pay general damages for the sexually harassing acts of its managers. b. is not liable if Susan complained about the problem and the company took no corrective action. c. is liable for punitive damages even if senior management had not been made aware of the problem. d. none of the above.
Which of the following is NOT bribery under the Bribery Act 2010? Select one: a. An individual who accepts payment to perform a public duty b. A company that offers a client reasonable hospitality c. An employee of a company who offers a non-financial reward to a public official to perform a public duty.
Should the public have taken more of a stance against his actions? If so, what action(s) could the public have taken? If not, give reasons why the public should not involve itself in such situations. Should the government have taken any action in this situation, given that the CEO was making a point against legislation it had introduced? If so, explain the action that you believe the government should have taken. If not, explain why you do not believe any government action is justified.
East Coast Waffles, Inc., an Atlanta-based company which owns and operates more than 100 Waffle House restaurants in Florida and Virginia, fired an employee who claimed that his fellow servers at a Tampa Florida Waffle House were harassing several customers because of their race. The employee that was fired did not claim "whistleblower" status, the employee simply claimed that such action was improper.Is this permitted (firing the employee who reported the actions of the others) under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act?Post at least a 125 word discussion and respond to at least 2 of your colleagues' postings. Support your discussion with at least 1 Internet citation in APA style.
Mr Grump is a former employee of Fashion retail store. He was recently dismissed on grounds of committing misconduct in the workplace. Mr Grump, being very resentful over his dismissal, decided to exact revenge. He contacted his best friend Mr Y who has knowledge on hacking. Mr Grump with the help of Mr Y hacked into the Fashion online financial systems and erased important digital data. Determine whether the Fashion retail store can institute legal action, and if so, on what grounds. Make reference to relevant case law and legislation in your answer.
Part 1. Eric has applied for the position of a reservations clerk in your hotel. The individual has no experience, but he types quickly and accurately and has good listening skills as well as a pleasant speaking voice. Eric has very limited eyesight. He is considered to be "legally blind" and is covered by ADA. Discuss ways in which management in your hotel could accommodate Eric's disability with or without a reasonable accommodation.
Brad is a production engineer at a bicycle company and part of his job includes inspecting broken bikes and drafting the design repairs for their repair. Brad is considering replacing a broken brake cable with a more durable material, even though the customer did not request it in their order, and specifically requested that no aesthetic changes be made to the bike. Brad’s manager suggests that his considered actions would against the company’s policy of “The customer is always right.” Should Brad disobey the manager and the customer to possibly lose his job or go along with what they want?
During an embezzlement trial, the plaintiff’s attorney is performing a direct examination of a witness. The attorney asks the witness, “What happened when you asked your supervisor what they knew about the incident?” The witness replies, “my supervisor said that Mr. Smith had embezzled money from the company.” Smith is the sole defendant in the case. Which of the following is the most accurate statement concerning the witness’s response? A. The witness’s response is hearsay, but it is admissible because a hearsay exception applies. B. The witness’s response is not hearsay, and it is admissible. C. The witness’s response is not hearsay, but it is inadmissible because it is unreliable. D. The witness’s response is inadmissible hearsay
Mary and Sue both work in the same department. Mary believes that Sue is being paid considerably more than she is. In fact, both employees are being paid about the same amount. Mary complains to her boss and the compensation manager and wants a pay raise. What should the compensation manager say, assuming the firm follows the policy of not revealing the pay of individual employees? Should Mary be told the amount of Sue’s pay? Or, should Mary only be told that there is a “misunderstanding’ and that her believe is incorrect? Or, should some other approach be taken?
Please answer this very simple question displayed with the image above
Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), employers are prohibited from discriminating against employees on the basis of their age once an employee has reached age 45. Group startsTrue or False True, unselectedFalse, unselected