A gold on iron oxide catalyst was prepared by wet impregnation and dried at 110 °C overnight. The sample was then subjected to XPS analysis, and the following peak areas determined from the high resolution spectra: Integrated Peak Area Sensitivity Factor Element C 13587 0.278 0.78 5187 13587 4000 Fe 2.957 Au 6.25

A gold on iron oxide catalyst was prepared by wet impregnation and dried at 110 °C overnight. The sample was then subjected to XPS analysis, and the following peak areas determined from the high resolution spectra: Integrated Peak Area Sensitivity Factor Element C 13587 0.278 0.78 5187 13587 4000 Fe 2.957 Au 6.25

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

13. Electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to analyze the eluate from a high-performance liquid chromatography separation. The mass spectrum of one chromatographic peak, containing a protein of unknown molecular mass, displays MH peaks at m/z = 5 654.208, 5 277.326, 4 947.590, 4 656.613, 4 397.990, and 4 166.576. Find the average molecular mass (M) of the neutral protein and its standard deviation.
I need only hand written answer
Aa.53.
6. In a flame spectrometric determination of sodium, lithium is used as an internal standard. Assume the spectrum of a standard solution that contains 2.00 ppm Na and 100 ppm Li shows two peaks with intensities of Ina= 4.22 and IL= 9.24, respectively. An unknown sample solution that also contains 100 ppm Li gives two peaks with intensities of Ina = 6.16 and I= 8.24, respectively. Calculate the concentration of Na in the unknown sample in ppm. А. 3.08 ppm В. 6.16 рpm C. 4.22 ppm D. 3.27 ppm Е. 12.1 ppm
Would you consider Sample 2 to be an outlier? Discuss with evidence and with consideration to the limitations of the test used
A simultaneous determination for cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni) can be based upon absorption by their respective 8-hydroxyquinolinol complexes. Molar absorptivities corresponding to their absorption maxima are as follows: Molar Absorptivity, 8 365 nm 700 nm Со 3600 430 Ni 3200 10 The absorbances of a sample at 365 nm and 700 nm with a 1.00-cm cell are 0.600 and 0.040, respectively. Calculate the molar concentration of nickel (ex:) and cobalt (cco) in the sample. A. CN = 3.20 x 10$ M, cco = 3.60 x 10:5 M B. CNi = 3.60 x 10$ M, cco =3.20 × 10$ M C. CNi = 1.00 x 10³ M, cco = 4.13 x 10$ M D. CNi = 8.70 x 105 M, cco = 9.10 x 105 M CNi = 9.10 x 10$ M, cco = 8.70 x 10 M E.
A sample of water from the North Sea was analysed by ion-chromatography and the sulfate concentration determined to be 2960 mg/L. A sample of formation water from a reservoir near Shetland was analysed by atomic emission spectroscopy and the strontium concentration determined to be 770 mg/L. If the Ksp value for strontium sulfate is 3.44x10- mol- L-2 predict whether precipitation should occur if 500 ml of the seawater is mixed with 500 ml of the formation water.
A series of eight absorbance measurements using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer are as follows: 0.855, 0.836, 0.848, 0.870, 0.859, 0.841, 0.861, and 0.852. According to the instrument manufacturer, the precision of the absorbance measurements using this instrument should not exceed 1% relative standard deviation. Does it in this case?
Kindly answer this question i, ii & iii
Given the following size frequency for a dust: Size Interval (um) 7-17.5 17.5-21 21-25 25-28 28-30 30-33 33-36 36-41 41-49 49-70 % by Number 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 a. Plot the cumulative frequency distributions (in %) of the number, surface area, and mass on linear graph paper assuming all particles are spheres with Pp 1.6 g cm ³. = b. Is this a log-normally distributed dust?
An atomic absorption method for the determination of the amount of iron present in used jet engine oil was found from pooling 30 triplicate analyses to have a standard deviation s = 3.1 µg Fe/mL. If s is a good estimate of o, calculate the 95 and 99% confidence intervals for the result 21.7 µg Fe/mL if it was based on the following criteria. (a) a single analysis 95% confidence interval= 21.7 + 99% confidence interval = 21.7 + (b) the mean of two analyses 95% confidence interval = 21.7 + 99% confidence interval= (c) the mean of six analyses 21.7 ± 95% confidence interval = 21.7 + 99% confidence interval= 21.7 + μg Fe/mL μg Fe/mL μg Fe/mL μg Fe/mL μg Fe/mL μg Fe/mL
None