A consumer products testing group is evaluating two competing brands of tires, Brand 1 and Brand 2. Tread wear can vary considerably depending on the type of car, and the group is trying to eliminate this effect by installing the two brands on the same 10 cars, chosen at random. In particular, each car has one tire of each brand on its front wheels, with half of the cars chosen at random to have Brand 1 on the left front wheel, and the rest to have Brand 2 there. After all of the cars are driven over the standard test course for 20,000 miles, the amount of tread wear (in inches) is recorded, as shown in the table below. 78 Car Brand 1 Brand 2 Difference (Brand 1- Brand 2) Send data to calculator 1 2 0.51 0.56 0.62 0.58 0.58 6 10 0.42 0.48 0.61 0.34 0.62 0.57 0.29 0.57 0.47 0.31 0.21 0.55 0.44 0.46 0.62 -0.06 0.27 0.05 0.11 0.27 0.21 -0.07 0.17 -0.12 0.00 Based on these data, can the consumer group conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean tread wears of the brands differ? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μ (which is μ with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in tread wear for the two brands of tires. Assume that this population of differences (Brand 1 minus Brand 2) is normally distributed. Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)

Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
4th Edition
ISBN:9781285463247
Author:David Poole
Publisher:David Poole
Chapter2: Systems Of Linear Equations
Section2.4: Applications
Problem 28EQ
icon
Related questions
Question
A consumer products testing group is evaluating two competing brands of tires, Brand 1 and Brand 2. Tread wear can vary considerably depending on the type
of car, and the group is trying to eliminate this effect by installing the two brands on the same 10 cars, chosen at random. In particular, each car has one tire of
each brand on its front wheels, with half of the cars chosen at random to have Brand 1 on the left front wheel, and the rest to have Brand 2 there. After all of
the cars are driven over the standard test course for 20,000 miles, the amount of tread wear (in inches) is recorded, as shown in the table below.
6 7 8 9
Car
Brand 1
Brand 2
Difference
(Brand 1- Brand 2)
Send data to calculator
1
0.51
2
0.56
0.57 0.29
3
4
5
10
0.62 0.58 0.58 0.42 0.48 0.61 0.34 0.62
0.57 0.47 0.31 0.21 0.55 0.44 0.46 0.62
-0.06 0.27 0.05 0.11 0.27 0.21 0.07 0.17 -0.12 0.00
Based on these data, can the consumer group conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean tread wears of the brands differ? Answer this question
by performing a hypothesis test regarding μ (which is μ with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in tread wear for the two brands of tires.
Assume that this population of differences (Brand 1 minus Brand 2) is normally distributed.
Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as
specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)
Transcribed Image Text:A consumer products testing group is evaluating two competing brands of tires, Brand 1 and Brand 2. Tread wear can vary considerably depending on the type of car, and the group is trying to eliminate this effect by installing the two brands on the same 10 cars, chosen at random. In particular, each car has one tire of each brand on its front wheels, with half of the cars chosen at random to have Brand 1 on the left front wheel, and the rest to have Brand 2 there. After all of the cars are driven over the standard test course for 20,000 miles, the amount of tread wear (in inches) is recorded, as shown in the table below. 6 7 8 9 Car Brand 1 Brand 2 Difference (Brand 1- Brand 2) Send data to calculator 1 0.51 2 0.56 0.57 0.29 3 4 5 10 0.62 0.58 0.58 0.42 0.48 0.61 0.34 0.62 0.57 0.47 0.31 0.21 0.55 0.44 0.46 0.62 -0.06 0.27 0.05 0.11 0.27 0.21 0.07 0.17 -0.12 0.00 Based on these data, can the consumer group conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean tread wears of the brands differ? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μ (which is μ with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in tread wear for the two brands of tires. Assume that this population of differences (Brand 1 minus Brand 2) is normally distributed. Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)
(a) State the null hypothesis H and the alternative hypothesis H₁.
Ho
:
H₁ :
(b) Determine the type of test statistic to use.
Type of test statistic: Chi-Square ▼
(c) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round to three or more decimal places.)
0
(d) Find the two critical values at the 0.05 level of significance. (Round to three or more decimal places.)
and 0
(e) At the 0.05 level, can the consumer group conclude that the mean tread wears of the brands differ?
Yes No
Degrees of freedom: 0
3.
μ
|x
X
0#0
O
X
S
Р
0=0 OSO 020
0<0
<o
010
0>0
Transcribed Image Text:(a) State the null hypothesis H and the alternative hypothesis H₁. Ho : H₁ : (b) Determine the type of test statistic to use. Type of test statistic: Chi-Square ▼ (c) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round to three or more decimal places.) 0 (d) Find the two critical values at the 0.05 level of significance. (Round to three or more decimal places.) and 0 (e) At the 0.05 level, can the consumer group conclude that the mean tread wears of the brands differ? Yes No Degrees of freedom: 0 3. μ |x X 0#0 O X S Р 0=0 OSO 020 0<0 <o 010 0>0
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning