Of the female applicants,% were admitted to program 2. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Find the admission rates for program 3. Of the male applicants, % were admitted to program 3. Of the female applicants,% were admitted to program 3. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Find the admission rates for program 4 . Of the male applicants, % were admitted to program 4. Of the female applicants, % were admitted to program 4. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Which of the comparisons you made do you consider most valid? Why? O A. Overall average, because it does not differentiate between the four programs O B. Individual program comparisons, because they take into account the different numbers of applicants and admission rates for each of the four progr c. Overall average, because it takes into account the differences in number of applicants and admission rates for each of the four programs

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
100%
Males accepted
(of applicants)
495 of 829
Females accepted (of applicants)
An article examined the graduate admissions process for evidence of gender bias. The table shows the number of
applicants accepted to each of four graduate programs.
93 of 106
353 of 553
18 of 23
160 of 379
131 of 405
21 of 379
1000 of 2166
23 of 343
294 of 851
Total
a) What percentage of total applicants were admitted?
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
b) Overall, were a higher percentage of males or females admitted?
Females
Males
c) Compare the percentage of males and females admitted into each program. Start by finding the rates of admission for males and females into program 1.
Of the male applicants,
% were admitted to program 1.
Of the female applicants, % were admitted to program 1.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Find the admission rates for program 2.
Of the male applicants,
% were admitted to program 2.
Of the female applicants, % were admitted to program 2.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Transcribed Image Text:Males accepted (of applicants) 495 of 829 Females accepted (of applicants) An article examined the graduate admissions process for evidence of gender bias. The table shows the number of applicants accepted to each of four graduate programs. 93 of 106 353 of 553 18 of 23 160 of 379 131 of 405 21 of 379 1000 of 2166 23 of 343 294 of 851 Total a) What percentage of total applicants were admitted? (Round to one decimal place as needed.) b) Overall, were a higher percentage of males or females admitted? Females Males c) Compare the percentage of males and females admitted into each program. Start by finding the rates of admission for males and females into program 1. Of the male applicants, % were admitted to program 1. Of the female applicants, % were admitted to program 1. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Find the admission rates for program 2. Of the male applicants, % were admitted to program 2. Of the female applicants, % were admitted to program 2. (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Of the female applicants,
% were admitted to program 2.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Find the admission rates for program 3.
Of the male applicants,% were admitted to program 3.
Of the female applicants,% were admitted to program 3.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Find the admission rates for program 4 .
Of the male applicants, % were admitted to program 4.
Of the female applicants,
% were admitted to program 4.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Which of the comparisons you made do you consider most valid? Why?
O A. Overall average, because it does not differentiate between the four programs
O B. Individual program comparisons, because they take into account the different numbers of applicants and admission rates for each of the four programs
Oc. Overall average, because it takes into account the differences in number of applicants and admission rates for each of the four programs
Transcribed Image Text:Of the female applicants, % were admitted to program 2. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Find the admission rates for program 3. Of the male applicants,% were admitted to program 3. Of the female applicants,% were admitted to program 3. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Find the admission rates for program 4 . Of the male applicants, % were admitted to program 4. Of the female applicants, % were admitted to program 4. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Which of the comparisons you made do you consider most valid? Why? O A. Overall average, because it does not differentiate between the four programs O B. Individual program comparisons, because they take into account the different numbers of applicants and admission rates for each of the four programs Oc. Overall average, because it takes into account the differences in number of applicants and admission rates for each of the four programs
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 7 steps with 7 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Points, Lines and Planes
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,