Answered: 5. According to Feldstein [2008b],… | bartleby

Microeconomic Theory

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter12: The Partial Equilibrium Competitive Model

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 12.11P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Please correct answer and don't used hand raiting

5. According to Feldstein [2008b], "only about
10% to 20% of a one-time tax rebate provided
to taxpayers in 2008 was spent immediately.
Using the life-cycle model of Figure 18.7,
explain why this result could have been pre-
dicted. (Hint: Think about how a one-time rebate
affects the endowment point and budget con-
straint in Figure 18.7. Contrast this to how a
permanent rebate affects the endowment point
and budget constraint.)
mate
quen
very
40 pe
10. In an
giver
when
that

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

The negative income tax has been proposed as a means The negative income tax has been proposed as a means of increasing both the efficiency and the equity of Canada’s tax system (see Applying Economic Concepts 18-1 on page 465). The most basic NIT can be described by two variables: the guaranteed annual income and the marginal tax rate. Suppose the guaranteed annual income is $8000 and the marginal tax rate on every dollar earned is 35 percent. With this NIT, after-tax income is given by After-tax income = 8000 + (1 – 0.35) X (Earned income) a. On a scale diagram with after-tax income on the vertical axis and earned income on the horizontal axis, draw the NIT relationship between earned income and after-tax income. b. What is the level of income at which taxes paid on earned income exactly equal the guaranteed annual income? c. The average tax rate is equal to total net taxes paid divided by earned income. Provide an algebraic expression for the average tax…
In a recent cost-benefit analysis of a proposed regulation that generated positive net benefits in the present but negative net benefits in the future, the government used a 8% social discount rate. If it had used an 10% social discount rate instead, then the net present value of the policy would have been __; if it had used a 4% social discount rate, then the net present value of the policy would have been a. lower; lower. O b. higher; lower. O c. higher; higher. d. lower; higher. Clear my choice
In a recent cost-benefit analysis of a proposed regulation that generated positive net benefits in the present but negative net benefits in the future, the government used a 8% social discount rate. If it had used an 10% social discount rate instead, then the net present value of the policy would have been if it had used a 4% social discount rate, then the net present value of the policy would have been O a. higher; higher. O b. lower; higher. O c. lower; lower. O d. higher; lower. In a recent cost-benefit analysis of a proposed regulation that would have generated negative net benefits in the present but positive net benefits in the future, the government used a 8% social discount rate. If it had used a 10% social discount rate instead, then the net present value of the policy would have ; if it had used a 4% social discount rate, then the net present been value of the policy would have been O a. higher; lower. O b. higher; higher. O c. lower; lower. O d. lower; higher.
Discuss thoroughly two of the principles often used inevaluating tax policy: ability to pay (includehorizontal and vertical equity), and the benefits principle. Canthese principles typically be satisfied simultaneously? Why or why not? Provide an example of a tax policy orinstrument which primarily emphasizes the “ability-to-pay”principle and also an example which primarily emphasizes the“benefits” principle.
1. For what kind of preferences will the consumer be just as well off facing a quantity tax as an income tax? 2. Someone is willing to maximize his/her utility. Assume he/she knows his/her u(x,y) = %3D x0.Sy0$ (Cobb-Douglas) (a) Find his/her optimal consumption given the income = 20, Px=2, Py=4! %3D (b) Depict his/her optimal consumption graph! 3. Suppose that x and y (from your answer in number 2) are now perfect complement with u(x,y) = min(x,y). (a) Find his/her optimal consumption (given the same income and prices)! (b) Depict his/her optimal consumption graph! Best of Luck!
“How to allocate limited resources to their best use is the very first and fundamental principle that you guys learn in a first course in both economics and finance.” Explain how the concepts and techniques covered in the various topics in this course can help address the issue. [Hint: Think about how NPV, as an investment decision rule, addresses the efficient allocation of limited resources problem. Specifically, why an investment project being “profit-making” may still be value- destroying and result in misallocation of resources?]
E2
5. A consumer has preferences over vegetables and meat given by the utility function U(V, M) of vegetables is $2 and the price of each serving of meat is $1. The government wants to encourage vegetable consumption so it puts a tax of $1 on each unit of meat purchased. If the consumer maximizes their utility, how much will the tax reduce their meat consumption? VAM2/3. They currently have $30 to spend, the price of each serving %3D
2. Consider a society with only two people one rich and one poor-who have the same util- ity functions. These utility functions exhibit diminishing marginal utility. Suppose that taxes are set such that the total amount of utility that each person loses is the same. Does it follow that the tax will be progressive? Explain.
Suppose the following model of govemment efficiency. Ublity function over consumption of private goods (C) and pubic goods (G) is such that this country desires to have 2 units of consumption good per each unit of public good Exogenous Income: Y= 20 Lump-sum taxT Govermment eficiency: a (This measures the number of public goods that can be produced from one unit of private consumption good) it the optimai lump-sum tax, T. that maximizes the representative consumer's utity and balance the government budget, is 10, then what is the value govemment eficiency. g? OA 1/3 OB 05 Oc. 02 OD. 23 OE none of the above
On July 1, 1965, the federal ad valorem taxes on many goods and services were eliminated. Comparing prices before and after this change, we can determine how much the price fell in response to the tax's elimination. Given an ad valorem tax of v, the tax collected on a good that sold for p was vp. If the price fell by vp when the tax was eliminated, consumers must have been bearing the full incidence of the tax. Consequently, consumers got the full benefit of removing the tax from those goods. The entire amount of the tax cut was passed on to consumers for all commodities and services that were studied for which the taxes were collected at the retail level (except admissions and club dues) and for most commodities for which excise taxes were imposed at the manufacturer level, including face powder, sterling silverware, wristwatches, and handbags (Brownlee and Perry, 1967). List the conditions (in terms of the elasticities or shapes of supply or demand curves) that are consistent with…
a) Solve for equilibrium output in terms of the exogenous variables. b) What is the multiplier? Is the multiplier higher whent1is 0 or whent1is positive? Note)t1= 0is the same as the baseline case we covered in class when taxes are exogenous. c) Supposec0increases by $300 m. What is the change in equilibrium Y when c1= 0.5 and t1= 0.2. What about whenc1= 0.5 and t1= 0?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Microeconomic Theory

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Microeconomic Theory

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS