Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada U.S. Production Possibilities One Possibility Another Possibility Quantity of Cars (Millions) 10 0 Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet) 0 10 Canada Production Possibilities One Possibility Another Possibility Quantity of Cars (Millions) 2 0 Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet) 0 12 Reference: Ref 8-3 Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada (Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada) Use Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada. Both nations can produce cars and lumber. In _____, the opportunity cost of _____ cars is _____ board feet of lumber. Question 2 options: Canada; 1 million; 6 million Canada; 1 million; 166,000 the United States; 1 million; 10 million the United States; 10 million; 1 million

Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada U.S. Production Possibilities One Possibility Another Possibility Quantity of Cars (Millions) 10 0 Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet) 0 10 Canada Production Possibilities One Possibility Another Possibility Quantity of Cars (Millions) 2 0 Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet) 0 12 Reference: Ref 8-3 Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada (Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada) Use Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada. Both nations can produce cars and lumber. In ___, the opportunity cost of _ cars is ___ board feet of lumber. Question 2 options: Canada; 1 million; 6 million Canada; 1 million; 166,000 the United States; 1 million; 10 million the United States; 10 million; 1 million

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter33: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5SCQ: How can there be any economic gains for a country from both importing and exporting the same good,...

See similar textbooks

U.S. Production Possibilities	One Possibility	Another Possibility
Quantity of Cars (Millions)	10	0
Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet)	0	10
Canada Production Possibilities	One Possibility	Another Possibility
Quantity of Cars (Millions)	2	0
Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet)	0	12

Similar questions

Typed answer.
Minerals 25 (millions of tons) 20 15 10 5 5 10 15 20 25 Grapes (millions of tons) Figure 1 Production possibility frontier for Highland Towards the right of Figure 1 are two circular red markers with a line between them that you can use to draw a production possibility frontier on Figure 1. You can move the markers with the mouse by clicking on them and dragging. Alternatively, you can tab to each marker and then use the keyboard arrow keys. Decide where to position the red markers based on the information below. There are two countries, called Highland and Lowland, with very different geography. They both produce grapes and dig for minerals, using only labour, with constant returns to scale. Figure 1 shows the production possibility frontier for Highland and the table shows the working population and productivity for Lowland. Working population and production possibilities Working population Production of tons of grapes per person per year Production of tons of minerals per person per…
what sliders do i use?
Problem 19-03 (algo) The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative D and for the United States is alternative S. China Production Possibilities ok Product A B D E F Apparel 80,000 64,000 int Chemicals (tons) 0 32 48,000 64 32,000 96 16,000 128 160 rences Product Apparel Chemicals (tons) U.S. Production Possibilities R 240,000 0 S T 192,000 144,000 48 96 U 96,0000 144 W 48,000 0 192 240 Instructions: Enter your answers as whole numbers. a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two countries should specialize? Yes If so what product should each produce?
1 Trade Suppose Cascadia has the following industry-level output (in dollars) and emissions rates (in tons of CO₂ per dollar) in 2000 and 2020. Year Industry 2000 Output Emissions Rate Output 80 300 300 250 Agriculture 50 Electricity 100 Transportation 150 Industry 200 0.16 0.2 0.26 0.3 2020 Emissions Rate 0.12 0.16 0.2 0.25 1.1 Calculate the Scale, Scale+Composition, and Scale+Composition+Technique effects 1.2 Use your answers from the previous question to explain which of the scale, com- position, and technique effects has had the largest impact on emissions growth
1. Production Possibilities It has been determined that Germany and France can produce the following combinations of consumer and capital goods. Germany Option Consumer Goods Capital Goods A 0 B C D E 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 France Consumer Goods Capital Goods 1,200,000 0 900,000 600,000 300,000 0 150,000 300,000 450,000 600,000 Complete parts a, b, and c. a. Graph the production possibilities curve for both nations on separate graphs with capital goods on the x-axis in each case. b. Does the Law of Increasing Opportunity Costs hold for France? Explain why or why not. c. If Germany wanted to experience higher levels of economic growth over the next few years, would they be better off choosing option B (a combination of 15000 capital goods and 90000 consumer goods) or option D (a combination of 45000 capital goods and 30000 consumer goods)? Explain.
Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada U.S. Production Possibilities One Possibility Another Possibility Quantity of Cars (millions) Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet) Canada Production Possibilities 10 10 One Possibility Another Possibility Quantity of Cars (millions) Quantity of Lumber (millions of board feet) 12 (Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada) Use Table: Production Possibilities for the United States and Canada. has/have an absolute advantage in producing cars. The United States Both the United States and Canada Canada Neither the United States nor Canada
Please answer the question number 2 (a,b,c) only
Figure 2.2. Canadian Trade Possibilities Televisions 16 12 8 4 0 Canada's Transformation Schedule Televisions 8 12 International Terms of Trade Refrigerators Televisions and refrigerators Neither televisions nor refrigerators с 16 20 B 24 Figure 2.2 shows a straight-line production possibilities curve with televisions on the vertical axis and refrigerators on the horizontal axis for Canada. The intercept on the vertical axis equals 16 and on the horizontal axis equals 24. Point A shows a point where an indifference curve is tangent to the production possibilities curve where televisions on the vertical axis equal 8 and refrigerators on the horizontal axis equal 12. A downward sloping straight line representing the international terms of trade starts at a point where refrigerators equal 24; an indifference curve is tangent to this line at a point where televisions equal 12 and refrigerators equal 16. Referring to Figure 2.2, Canada has a comparative advantage in: Refrigerators
Production possibilities of the United States (USA) and South Africa (RSA): USA RSA wheat (bushels/hour) 4 1 cloth ( meters/hour) 3 2 Plot the production frontiers of the United States and South Africa
Short Answer (8.0score) 33. The chart below is the prodution cost of US. and UK. U.S. U.K. Wheat (bushels/labor hour) 6 1 Cloth (yards/labor hour) 4 2 question: (1) explain the comparative advantage of each nation; (2) what is the gain from trade if the two trade for 4 wheat for 4 cloth?
Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.Answer completely.You will get up vote for sure.