4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2,respectively, equal toMAC₁ = 20-E1MAC2 = 12-E2a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm?b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way theyintend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. Whatare the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributedbetween the firms?c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in whichto reduce emissions by 50%?

a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm?In an unregulated market, there is no…

Answered: 4. Consider two polluting firms, with…

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter10: Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Table 12.12, shows the supply and demand conditions for a firm that will play trumpets on the streets when requested. QS1 is the quantity supplied without social costs. QS2 is the quantity supplied with social costs. What is the negative externality in this situation? Identify the equilibrium price and quantity when we account only for private costs, and then when we account for social costs. How does accounting for the externality affect the equilibrium price and quantity?
Economists sometimes shock noneconomists by stating that they do not favor the complete elimination of pollution. Explain the rationale for this position.
In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of pollution, called gunk. Table 12.14 shows possible combinations of economic output and reduction of gunk, depending on what kinds of environmental regulations you choose. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the percentage reduction of gunk, and with the quantity of economic output on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between K and L, can you say which one is better and why? In the choice between K. and N, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is move likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice L or M? Why?
Do market demand curves reflect positive externalities? Why or why not?
How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created by low-income countries?
Refer to Table 12.2. The externality created by the refrigerator production was 100. However, once we accounted for both the private and additional external costs, the market price increased by only 50. If the external costs were 100 why did the price only increase by 50 when we accounted for all costs?
Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium, assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in public. Label the equilibrium private market price and quantity as Pm and Qm. Add whatever is needed to the model to show the impact of the negative externality from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as Fe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at the market output.
Draw a standard supply and demand diagram for televisions, and indicate the equilibrium price and output. a. Assuming that the production of televisions generates external costs, illustrate the effect of the producers being forced to pay a tax equal to the external costs generated, and indicate the equilibrium output. b. If instead of generating external costs, television production generates external benefits, illustrate the effect of the producers being given a subsidy equal to the external benefits generated, and indicate the equilibrium output.
Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoners dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can cheese whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two centuries. In Table 12.10, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.
What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?
The many identical residents of Whoville love drinking Zlurp. Each resident has the following willingness to pay for the tasty refreshment: a. The cost of producing Zlurp is 150, and the competitive suppliers sell it at this price. (The supply curve is horizontal.) How many bottles will each Whovillian consume? What is each persons consumer surplus? b. Producing Zlurp creates pollution. Each bottle has an external cost of 1. Taking this additional cost into account, what is total surplus per person in the allocation you described in part (a)? c. Cindy Lou Who, one of the residents of Whoville, decides on her own to reduce her consumption of Zlurp by one bottle. What happens to Cindys welfare (her consumer surplus minus the cost of pollution she experiences)? How does Cindys decision affect total surplus in Whoville? d. MayorCrinch imposes a 1 tax on Zlurp. What is consumption per person now? Calculate consumer surplus, the external cost, government revenue, and total surplus per person. e. Based on your calculations, would you support the mayors policy? Why or why not?
Classify the following pollution-control policies as command-and-control or market incentive based. A state emissions tax on the quantity of carbon emitted by each firm. The federal government requires domestic auto companies to improve car emissions by 2020. The EPA sets national standards for water quality. A city sells permits to films that allow them to emit a specified quantity of pollution. The federal government pays fishermen to preserve salmon.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781337091992

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305971493

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781337091992

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305971493

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…

Economics

ISBN:

9781285165875

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781305156050

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781337617383

Author:

Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS