2. Suppose that two firms, an incumbent and a potential entrant, compete in a market. If they both operate, the resulting profits for the incumbent and the potential entrant are $30 million and $5 million, respectively. If the potential entrant decides not to enter the market, the resulting profits for the incumbent and potential entrant are $100 million and S0, respectively. Assume that it is not an option for the incumbent to exit the market. (a) Which of the two possible outcomes (for the potential entrant to enter or not enter) are Pareto efficient? (b) Now suppose there are side payments available Which of the two possible outcomes is Pareto efficient? (c) Is it possible that the incumbent will agree to pay for the introduction of side payments? (d) Now suppose that side payments are allowed, but it costs $80 million in legal fees to actually use them. Which of the two possible outcomes (for the potential entrant to enter or not enter) are Pareto efficient allocations? (For simplicity, please assume no one is made better off by the $80 million fees.)

2. Suppose that two firms, an incumbent and a potential entrant, compete in a market. If they both operate, the resulting profits for the incumbent and the potential entrant are $30 million and $5 million, respectively. If the potential entrant decides not to enter the market, the resulting profits for the incumbent and potential entrant are $100 million and S0, respectively. Assume that it is not an option for the incumbent to exit the market. (a) Which of the two possible outcomes (for the potential entrant to enter or not enter) are Pareto efficient? (b) Now suppose there are side payments available Which of the two possible outcomes is Pareto efficient? (c) Is it possible that the incumbent will agree to pay for the introduction of side payments? (d) Now suppose that side payments are allowed, but it costs $80 million in legal fees to actually use them. Which of the two possible outcomes (for the potential entrant to enter or not enter) are Pareto efficient allocations? (For simplicity, please assume no one is made better off by the $80 million fees.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

QUESTION 7 Suppose two firms (X and Y) want to merge together. X currently controls 50.59% of the market, and Y currently controls 35.96% of the market. If X and Y merge, by how many points will the HHI increase? with X and Y separate) Hint this is the value of (HHI with X and Y merged) - (HHI Round your answers to two (2) decimal places if necessary
Coke and Pepsi dominate the cola market. Suppose that the marginal cost of making cola is $2. Assume also that the demand for cola is given by the following table: Price $8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Quantity 5 cans 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Suppose Coke and Pepsi both supply cola. They form a cartel and agree to cooperate on how much soda to produce. In this cartel case, how many bottles of cola would be sold? Type your answer...
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
Q2
6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Zipride and Citron are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell electric scooters. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for scooters. Zipride Pricing price. High Low For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Zipride prices low and Citron prices high, Zipride will earn a profit of $13 million, and Citron will earn a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Zipride and Citron are both profit-maximizing firms. Citron Pricing High 9,9 13, 3 If Zipride prices high, Citron will make more profit if it chooses a Low If the firms do not lude, 3, 13 6, 6 If Citron prices high, Zipride will make more profit if it chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low True False Both Zipride and Citron will choose a low price. strategies…
3. We consider the following situation between 2 firms. Firm A (the "acquirer") would like to take over firm T (the "target"). It does not know firm I's value; it believes that this value, when firm T is controlled by its own management, is at least $0 and at most $100, and assigns equal probability to each of the dollar values in this range (we assume that the value is distributed uniformly on this interval). Firm T will be worth 50% more under firm A's management than it is under its own management. Suppose that firm A bids p to take over firm 7; and firm T is worth x (under its own management). Then if T accepts A's offer, A's payoff is 2x-p and T's payoff is p; if T rejects A's offer, A's payoff is 0 and T's payoff is x. (a) Formalize this situation as a Bayesian Game (b) Find the Bayesian Nash Equilibria of this game.
5. Two firms compete repeatedly in a market of homogeneous goods. Each year, the firms can choose to charge a low or high price. The following payoff table summarizes their payoffs each year. The competition goes on indefinitely. Let 5 E (0, 1) denote the discount factor for both firms. Firm 2 Low High Low 0, 0 5, 0 Firm 1 High 0, 5 4, 4 Consider an n-period punishment trigger strategy s: • Play "High price" in the first stage. • In stage t> 2, if some player deviated to "Low price" in the last period when he is supposed to play "High price", then play "Low price" for n periods and then restart the game. In other words, after playing "Low price" for n periods, play "High price" in the next stage as if it is the first stage of the game. Otherwise, play "High price". Find the necessary and sufficient condition on & for (s, s) to be an SPE. A sufficiently simplified inequality will do.
Assume that the market for oil is made up of two firms: Exxon Mobil and Chevron. Also assume that New England has dozens of breweries and each of these make beers with different tastes, colors, and aromas. Which of the following statements is true? The market structure for oil is an oligopoly, and the one for beer is monopolistic competition. The market structure for oil is monopolistic competition, and the one for beer is an oligopoly. The market structure for both oil and beer is an oligopoly. The market structure for both oil and beer is monopolistic competition.
To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Creamland Advertise 10, 10 18, 2 Doesn't Advertise 2, 18 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $18 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of _________ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of ________ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of __________ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of _________…
The table below shows market share data for different firms producing desks. Market Share in % 15 18 7 11 6 10 4 5 5 16 Firm Aardvark Inc Baluga, LLC Cran Inc Delta Co Echo Co Farriss Co Gum Drop Inc Hill Corp Indigo Corp Jackson Co What is the Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI) for this market? ← HHI 225 324 49 121 36 100 16 25 25 256 Suppose that Delta Co and Gum Drop Inc are considering a merger. What will the HHI be after this merger?
11. Suppose there is a duopoly of two identical firms, A and B, facing a market inverse demand of P = 140 – 0.5Q, and cost functions of CA = 20QA and Cg = 20QB respectively. a. Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium and profit for each firm. b. Suppose that A acts as the leader in a Stackelberg model and B responds. What are the respective quantities and profits of each firm now? Is it advantageous to move first? c. If the firms were able to collude, how much additional profit could they earn if they switch from simple single pricing to perfect price discrimination? d. Graph and label equilibria on the inverse demand.
Suppose that GE is trying to prevent Maytag from entering the market for high efficiency clothes dryers. Even though high efficiency dryers are more costly to produce, they are also more profitable as they command sufficiently higher prices from consumers. The following payoffs table shows the annual profits for GE and Maytag for the advertising spending and entry decisions that they are facing. GE MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15 Based on this information, can GE successfully prevent Maytag from entering this market by increasing its advertising levels? What is the equilibrium outcome in this game? Suppose that an analyst at GE is convinced that just a little bit more advertising by GE, say another $2m, would be sufficient to deter enough customers from buying Maytag, thus, yield less than $0 profits for Maytag in the event it enters. Suppose that spending an extra $2m on advertising…