SAFMEDS W6 ABA632

docx

School

National University College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

632

Subject

Statistics

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by BailiffRoseCat63

Data Analysis and Study Approach for SAFMEDS Deck 3 Ayanna King National University ABA 632 Ethics Compliance Code Professor Lucy Orton September 10, 2023

Data Analysis and Study Approach for SAFMEDS Deck 3 Figure 1.1 Standard Celeration Chart for Acquisition Deck 3 Week 6 Figure 1.2 Raw Data for Acquisition Deck 3 Week 6

Figure 2.1 Standard Celeration Chart for Neutral Deck 3 for Week 6 Figure 2.2 Raw Data for Neutral Deck 3 for Week 6

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Data Analysis Above is data collected from week 6 of ABA 632, which consists of the acquisition deck 3, with the deck being used for the first time. This is shown in Figure 1.1 and 1.2, where there are 5 data points collected showing the highest score from each of the 5 days that trials were done. Then in Figures 2.1 and 2.2 is the neutral deck which is a collection of all the previous definition decks from all my previous classes. On the graph, there are also 5 data points, from each of the 5 days trials were done. The data starts on September 4, 2023, and then ends on September 10, 2023. Figure 1.2 shows the acquisition graph using Deck 3 with the baseline starting on September 4, 2023. The baseline has an accel 2 accel and decel 6. For acquisition accel, the final date was able to make it to a 6 accel score. This makes the accel acquisition line upward trend line and at the low-level ending for the week. The variability is low since it is the first week of using the card and it stayed at a consistent increase of data for accel acquisition data. Acquisition decel data had a baseline of 6 for the week then ended the week with the final decel of 3. This would make acquisition decel data line with a downward trend line with little variability. The decel 6 would seem like an outlier point but due to it being a baseline score, I would not consider it an outlier. Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.2 shows the data for the neutral deck, which consists of all the deck’s definition cards since ABA 620. With the 5 data points I collected on the graph, the data is consistent with the previous data on the graph. I have maintained low variability, no active trend line, and at a moderate level for data. For fluency accel, I stay with an average of 10- 11 making the line still close to straight since no real pattern line of increasing or decreasing. There is also no variability in the data on the accel data collected. The decel data is similar to the accel,

the decel stayed between the average of 3-2 decel making the trend line close to flat, with no variability with the scores. Study Approach Antecedent For SAFMEDS, my goal is to study for a minimum of an hour, and then split my study focus up by days when possible. I have 2 days of studying the decks separately the fluency deck the acquisition deck, so it will decrease my study time and help with one primary focus area. On weekends, I try to extend my studies if possible and then do most of my studying in the AM. When doing the trials, I also try to be in a new location for studying. Each trial is 30 seconds, then I write each of the scores down, where I study, the amount of time studying, and any factors affecting it, and then highlight the final score to input later. Behavior For both the acquisition deck and mastery deck, I study for at least 30 minutes to 45 minutes then, use a computer timer of 30 seconds to run the trials. All data is collected in the notebook for the week and the class. On weekends, the time for studying is extended to 45 minutes minimum. I did the normal study time of only 30 to 45 minutes before running the trials. For week 6 this is the first week of trying deck 3, so the information was new and reviewed the cards more often. The goal was to finish my study time and trials before 9:30 p.m. on the weekdays and then before noon on weekends. Consequences

For deck 3 acquisition data I was able to make progress with increasing my accel score from 2 to 6 by the end of the week. There was also a decrease decel scores for the acquisition graph having the baseline at 6 for decel then decreased down to 3 in decel. With the mastery deck, the scores are in the normal range, I have not ever made it to the goal line when it comes to this deck. I think this is due to so many definition cards so, information is harder to stay consistent with. I have always looked at the fluency deck as just up keeping with staying familiar with the different definitions. Adjustments There were not any adjustments made for this week and not any other factors impacted the data this week. The data range was normal for the first week of studying the deck information. My next week's adjustments are going to just be careful with time management due to the increase of assignments. I think especially with looking at the assignments sooner to really see my timeline. For example, I went to complete the discussion board on Thursday after studying but then realized the discussion board was a longer assignment. So if I had looked at the board earlier I would have started the discussion board first to have an on-time post compared to studying first.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version