Week-4 Reserach Methodology

docx

School

Walden University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

6301

Subject

Sociology

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by LostConfused

Report
1       Methodology Pavle Lippert Master of Social Work, Walden University SOCW 63001 Dr. Stevenson December 27th                        
2 Introduction to Methodology In the last few weeks, a substantial revision of the question was inserted regarding the following parameters:  severe mental illness, healthcare, clinical/therapeutic services, and residency.  In those contexts, the question became formed in structure:  "How does access to clinical/therapeutic services impact adults with SMI's ability to build resilience?".  That being stated, the Methodology has led to some notable findings on how to do such an inquiry. Furthermore, apprehending the consequence of admission to clinical and therapeutic services on the maturation of resilience in adults facing severe mental illness (SMI) necessitates an exhaustive and multifaceted procedure. This province of the literature outlines the methodological framework operated to investigate the intricate relationship between service accessibility and the cultivation of resilience in these inhabitants. Research Design     This question will require a mixed-methods research design, simultaneously implicating quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The integration of the approaches allows the literature and its findings to have an advanced exploration of the complex intersections between resilience-building processing among adults with SMI. Breaking down the study into the following subgroups of interest:  quantitative, qualitative, and longitudinal approaches,  with  ethical considerations  for the patients.  Quantitative Analysis In this study, the utilization of quantitative Methodology is beneficial in the pay for quantifying the extent of access to clinical and therapeutic services, resulting in the level of resilience of individuals in the targeted program or group. In that outline, this study could utilize surveys and
3 structured questions in administration to the adults with SMI, understanding that the goals of the surveys could be to find the service utilization, interventions received, and self-reported levels of reliance. Examples of such questionnaires could include both pre and post interventions include:  I. Connor-Davidson-Resilience Scale (CD-RISC. Ualized to measure self-resiliency. It's a 25-item and multifaceted factor assessment: comfort, tenacity, and stress adaptation.   II. Resilience Scare for Adults (RSA) can be utilized to test adult resiliency factors, like the CD-RISC.  III. Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). It might be the most effective due to the shortness of the test, only six items, and the focus on bouncing back and showing insight.  In reviewing my studies, most of them utilized a quantitative approach.  For illustration, let's break down the factors using the two studies below.  Study I   Addressing the Treatment Gap for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: Can a Short-Term Crisis And Transitional Intervention Impact Psychiatric And Medical Service Utilization? The research aims were specific and outlined as understanding service changes in 3 months with the service and the care setting. Secondly, what was the highest stabilization of the best services? Lastly, the last question is the lasting impact of the services on cost.  This specific study leans more toward quantitative research. This is due to the numerical approach (i.e., data analysis and objective measurements to assess). Secondly, data from clinical
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 outcomes, transmissions, and surveys with predefined scales of responses and measures or channels in the individuals or groups are highlighted in this sudy. Third, this study can capture a patient's perspective and experiences of the intervention, along with challenges.  Study II: Qualitative Exploration With the quantitative data sets, this Methodology allows the dive into the experiences lived by adults with SMIs while explaining the insights of the impact of clinical services and resilience. The study in this modality can be semi-structured interviews and focus groups, allowing the narrations and in-depth insights into the personal barriers, perceived benefits, and an excellent subjective understating of the construction of mental health challenges with SMI patients. Studies like "Barriers .... " in 2022 contained empirical studies, specifically semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and a qualitative study. This qualitative study allows it to relate to SMI patients and their experiences with providers.  References  Kohn, L., Christiaens, W., Detraux, J., De Lepeleire, J., De Hert, M., Gillain, B., Delaunoit, B., Savoye, I., Mistiaen, P., & Jespers, V. (2022). Barriers to somatic health care for persons with severe mental illness in Belgium: A qualitative study of patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives.  Frontiers in Psychiatry 12 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.798530