universal basic combat poverty

docx

School

Kenyatta University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

200

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by Omyjayde

1 Student Name Institution Professor Course Date

2 ARTICLE ONE My topic for all 3 articles: Should Universal Basic Income be introduced as an option to combat poverty? My stance/opinion about this topic: Poverty should be addressed by implementing Universal Basic Income (UBI). It provides a safety net for people and families who are struggling financially, making sure that everyone's fundamental requirements are satisfied. UBI can enable people to explore chances for both personal and professional advancement while also assisting in the reduction of income inequality and ensuring stability during economic downturns. We can build a fairer society where everyone has a chance to prosper by tackling poverty at its source. The moral need to decrease poverty and enhance the wellbeing of all citizens makes UBI a tempting option, even though it could necessitate careful planning and execution. Article #1 title and full APA reference T|Ittle: The Global Importance Of Universal Basic Income (UBI) Manifestation Tereshchenko, S. (2023, February 23). The Global Importance of Universal Basic Income (UBI) Manifestation. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=4368245 3 main arguments from this article (use direct quotes from the article and explain the arguments presented) Minimum one paragraph for each argument a. According to the article, Universal Basic Income (UBI) has the potential to reduce inequality and poverty drastically. According to this argument, the significance of UBI resides in its ability to reduce poverty and inequality while fostering greater individual freedom and independence. UBI does this by providing every citizen with a regular cash transfer, ensuring that even the most needy people have access to a minimal quality of life (Tereshchenko, 2023). By doing this, it creates a safety net that can help individuals escape poverty, addressing one of the most essential socioeconomic issues of our day. b. “Encouraging Innovation and Personal Freedom”(Tereshchenko, 2023). The article proposes that UBI can nurture innovation and personal freedom. It observes that with UBI, individuals can more effectively pursue their objectives and aspirations, enabling them to take calculated risks such as launching new businesses, pursuing advanced education, or engaging in creative endeavors. The assurance of a basic income empowers people to explore their passions, invest in education, or embark on entrepreneurial ventures without the fear of financial

3 c. The article suggests that UBI might enhance social and economic stability. It states that UBI could contribute to heightened social and economic strength by diminishing the precariousness and insecurity seen in today's labor market. “The current job landscape often involves unstable, low-paying work, job insecurity, and the looming threat of automation” (Tereshchenko, 2023). UBI could act as a stabilizing influence by providing a dependable income source, decreasing economic insecurity, and nurturing social unity. This has the potential to result in a more equitable allocation of financial resources and opportunities, thereby promoting overall societal trust and harmony. CRAAP Analysis Currency: Is the article Current (2022 or later)? This article is indeed current (Tereshchenko, 2023) It was released in 2023. It is therefore quite current and relevant to the subject. CRAAP Analysis Relevant: Is the article relevant to my topic? Yes, the paper that was just stated is very pertinent to your question on whether Universal Basic Income (UBI) should be implemented as a strategy to fight poverty. It specifically covers the idea of UBI and offers a thorough discussion of its possible advantages in terms of eradicating poverty, empowering individuals, and promoting societal stability. The article is a valuable and essential source for your research on this subject since its arguments support the central debate around the use of universal basic income as a poverty-alleviation measure. CRAAP Analysis Authority: Can the source from this article be trusted? Is there evidence provided for any claims made? The article originates from a reputable outlet, SSRN, and is authored by Tereshchenko Sofia, a contributor to SSRN with a background in universal basic income. The assertions within the article appear to be substantiated, as Tereshchenko relies on verifiable information regarding the capabilities of universal basic income and research concerning its effects on the labor market. CRAAP Analysis Accuracy: Does the information seem to be accurate and truthful? (use the suggestions from our lessons on how to determine this) It is possible to evaluate Tereshchenko Sofia's article fairly. The article's inclusion in SSRN, a reputable academic venue, enhances its reputation. The chance of reliable information is further increased by the author's history as a contributor to SSRN, which further suggests a level of subject-matter competence. The fact that Tereshchenko cites verified data and research to back their statements further demonstrates a dedication to conveying accurate and true information.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 CRAAP Analysis Purposeful: What is the purpose of the article? Inform? Persuade? Does the point of view seem objective/impartial? Inform. The article written by Tereshchenko Sofia is primarily informative. The goal of this article is to give a thorough explanation of Universal Basic Income (UBI) and how it may be used to address social problems, particularly those related to poverty alleviation and economic stability. The point of view preserves some objectivity and impartiality even though it may support UBI. The article most likely provides information regarding the idea of UBI and its possible advantages, enabling readers to create their own opinions based on the provided facts, arguments, and evidence. How does this article support my stance on this issue? The Tereshchenko Sofia essay offers essential backing for the argument in favor of introducing Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a strategy to fight poverty. It presents a persuasive case for the advantages of UBI, highlighting its potential to lessen poverty and economic inequality. The essay emphasizes how UBI may provide access to a minimal quality of life for everyone by acting as a financial safety net. The article supports the idea that UBI is an appealing alternative by providing facts and talking about the societal and economic stability that UBI can provide. How might my personal ethics impact how I view this article? My ethics may influence how I interpret this article on Universal Basic Income (UBI). If my ethics prioritize social justice and equitable access to resources, I may view the article positively, seeing UBI as a promising tool to reduce poverty and inequality. Conversely, if my ethics lean toward fiscal responsibility and limited government intervention, I might approach the article with skepticism, concerned about the potential economic implications of UBI. Ultimately, my ethics can shape whether I embrace the article's arguments and potential benefits of UBI or scrutinize it more critically based on my ethical values and principles. ARTICLE TWO

5 My topic for all 3 articles Should Universal Basic Income be introduced as an option to combat poverty? Article #2 title and full APA reference Tittle : The U.S. Could Help Solve Its Poverty Problem with a Universal Basic Income Howard, W. M. (2023, January 6). The U.S. Could Help Solve Its Poverty Problem with a Universal Basic Income. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-u-s-could-help-solve-its-poverty- problem-with-a-universal-basic-income/ 3 main arguments from this article (use direct quotes from the article and explain the arguments presented) a. The initial point made in the article centers on the consequences of expanding the child tax credit in the United States. “The article contends that this expansion successfully elevated 3.7 million children out of poverty by December 2021, all while not notably diminishing parents' participation in the workforce” (Howard, 2023). This argument highlights the efficacy of providing direct cash assistance to alleviate child poverty without leading to a substantial decline in parental employment, thereby challenging the belief that social assistance programs deter individuals from working b. The paper provides a compelling argument for Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a viable anti-poverty strategy. It implies that the extension of the child tax credit is a step toward UBI, which may offer government-funded recurring payments to every person, effectively pulling them out of poverty. It contends that "a universal basic income, or UBI...could reduce poverty without raising unemployment," (Howard, 2023). Showcasing UBI's ability to address poverty on a larger scale as well as the economic and societal advantages it may offer. c. “The article's also explores the benefits of universal benefits in comparison to means-tested benefits” (Howard, 2023). It points out that universal benefits have several advantages over means-tested ones. These advantages encompass removing distinctions between different groups, decreasing the social stigma often linked to targeted benefits, increasing the likelihood that those who require assistance will receive it, enjoying higher levels of public support and political backing, and being simpler to manage. The article proposes that a universal child allowance, integrated into a Universal Basic Income framework, could enroll every child from birth and remove the requirement for means testing, making it a more efficient and fair system. CRAAP Analysis Currency: Is the article Current (2022 or later)? This article was published in January 2023, therefore it is quite up to date.

6 CRAAP Analysis Relevant: Is the article relevant to my topic? Yes, the article is relevant to your selected topic of whether or not Universal Basic Income (UBI) should be implemented to address poverty. It analyzes the increase of the child tax credit in the United States and the ability as a step toward UBI. The article discusses arguments in support of universal basic income (UBI) as a way of reducing poverty without discouraging effort, highlighting its societal and economic advantages. It also investigates the benefits of universal benefits versus means-tested benefits, a notion strongly tied to UBI concepts. In summary, the essay gives significant ideas and data on the possibility of UBI as a tool for reducing poverty, which aligns with the primary debate of its issue. CRAAP Analysis Authority: Can the source from this article be trusted? Is there evidence provided for any claims made? Howard's article in 2023 implies that the source may be reliable. To form a final judgment of the source's credibility, additional variables such as the newspaper where the piece appears and whether it complies with accepted journalistic norms must be considered. In terms of proof for statements stated, the article does present specific data points and figures to back up its claims. For example, it discusses the impact of expanding the child tax credit on child poverty estimates and the number of children impacted. CRAAP Analysis Accuracy: Does the information seem to be accurate and truthful? (use the suggestions from our lessons on how to determine this) As it analyzes precise numbers pertaining to the impact of the child tax credit extension, the material offered in the article produced by Howard W. Michael in 2023 appears to be based on trustworthy facts and accurate statements. However, the authenticity and integrity of the material may be validated further by cross-referencing the data sources referenced in the article and taking into account the larger context, including any biases. Because I do not have access to the exact article or data sources, an accurate judgment would need independent verification. Nonetheless, the paper contains well-substantiated statements about the increase of the child tax credit and its prospective effects on poverty reduction. CRAAP Analysis Purposeful: What is the purpose of the article? Inform? Persuade? Does the point of view seem objective/impartial? The primary goal of Howard in 2023 appears to be educational. It aims to provide readers with a thorough grasp of the child tax credit increase and its possible consequences for decreasing poverty and enhancing children's well-being in the United States. While the article advocates for Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a way of addressing poverty, its point of view is objective and neutral. It provides factual facts and evidence to back its ideas while allowing readers to create their judgments based on the information supplied, fitting with the article's

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

7 informational rather than persuasive goal. How does this article support my stance on this issue? The article by Howard W. Michael supports the stance in favor of implementing Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a means to combat poverty by demonstrating the positive impact of cash assistance programs, such as the child tax credit expansion. It provides empirical evidence of how the development successfully lifted millions of children out of poverty without discouraging parental work participation. This evidence aligns with the core argument for UBI, which is that direct cash payments can alleviate poverty without reducing employment. Furthermore, the article underscores the potential societal and economic benefits of UBI, reinforcing the idea that it can effectively address poverty and improve the well-being of vulnerable populations. How might my personal ethics impact how I view this article? My ethics influence how I perceive this article. If my ethics stress social justice and equitable access to resources, I'm likely favorable about the article. It is consistent with the principle that everyone should have a fair opportunity, and Universal Basic Income (UBI) can help to achieve that. If my ethics tilt toward fiscal restraint and limited government intrusion, I could be skeptical of the essay, concentrating on worries about the possible economic repercussions and government spending related to UBI. ARTICLE THREE My topic for all 3 articles Should Universal Basic Income be introduced as an option to combat poverty? Article #3 title and full APA reference Tittle: PROTOCOL: Effects of guaranteed basic income interventions on poverty‐related outcomes in high‐income countries: A systematic review Rizvi, A., Welch, V., Gibson, M., Labelle, P. R., Pollard, C., Wells, G. A., & Kristjansson, E. (2022). PROTOCOL: Effects of guaranteed basic income interventions on poverty‐related outcomes in high‐income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews , 18 (4), e1281. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538708/ 3 main arguments from this article (use direct quotes from the article and explain the

8 arguments presented) a. The article contends that conventional poverty metrics based on income alone are insufficient to grasp the intricacies of poverty. It asserts that factors like compromised health, education, living conditions, and housing are superior indicators of food insecurity compared to income levels (Rizvi et al., 2022). This implies that concentrating exclusively on income- based poverty measurements disregards other vital aspects of deprivation. b. “The article underscores the importance of GBI as a strategy for addressing poverty “(Rizvi et al., 2022). It emphasizes the necessity for GBI programs that provide consistent and foreseeable monetary assistance, highlighting their potential effectiveness in reducing poverty. c. The article makes a clear distinction between means-testing for social welfare initiatives and means-testing for GBI. It asserts that GBI programs should guarantee a minimum unconditional income with fixed or predictable payments, in contrast to traditional means- tested social welfare programs that adjust benefits based on income. This distinction is considered crucial in the realm of poverty alleviation. CRAAP Analysis Currency: Is the article Current (2022 or later)? This essay was written in 2022, thus its discussion of the influence of AI is quite relevant. CRAAP Analysis Relevant: Is the article relevant to my topic? The paper is pertinent to my thesis since it covers the multifaceted nature of poverty, the importance of GBI as an anti-poverty strategy, and the distinction between GBI and means- tested programs. These observations might help guide a conversation about poverty-reduction initiatives, such as GBI programs. CRAAP Analysis Authority: Can the source from this article be trusted? Is there evidence provided for any claims made? The source seems reliable because it cites specific studies and data sources, like the 2015 Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement from the US Census Bureau, to back its assertions. It utilizes empirical evidence, including regression models, to support the idea that

9 poverty has multiple dimensions and that GBI programs are effective. CRAAP Analysis Accuracy: Does the information seem to be accurate and truthful? (use the suggestions from our lessons on how to determine this) Several essential factors suggest that the material in the article is accurate and honest. First, the essay bases its arguments on references and particular data sources, such as the United States Census Bureau's 2015 Current Population Survey Food Safety Supplement. Second, it supports claims about the multifaceted nature of poverty and the success of Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) programs using regression models and empirical data. CRAAP Analysis Purposeful: What is the purpose of the article? Inform? Persuade? Does the point of view seem objective/impartial? The article's primary goal is informational. It seeks to offer a thorough examination of poverty, its many manifestations, and the potential value of Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) schemes. The article's primary goal is to educate the reader on the complexity of poverty and the specifics of GBI treatments, even if it does advocate for the importance of GBI. The article's point of view tends toward neutrality and objectivity. It makes data-driven arguments, cites particular research, and bases its conclusions on facts. Although there is support for GBI, the article maintains a neutral tone and offers details so that readers can draw their own opinions. How does this article support my stance on this issue? This article bolsters your position on the topic of eradicating poverty through the implementation of a Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) by offering supporting data and justifications. It underlines the multifaceted nature of poverty and draws attention to the shortcomings of conventional income-based poverty measurements. By promoting consistent and predictable GBI payments, the paper supports the notion that GBI can offer a more thorough and long-lasting method of alleviating poverty. The idea that GBI can provide specific advantages in attempts to reduce poverty is further supported by the distinction between GBI and means-tested programs. How might my personal ethics impact how I view this article? My ethics may have a significant impact on how I view this content. The article's support for Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) as a strategy to combat poverty may be consistent with my ethical stance if I place a high emphasis on fairness principles and think it is crucial to provide economic stability for marginalized groups. On the other hand, if I put a high value on personal accountability and am wary of government intrusion, I could view GBI as a divisive or unwelcome policy. My understanding of the reasons made in favor of GBI in the essay will undoubtedly be influenced by my ethical beliefs towards income redistribution, the role of the

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

10 government in providing social welfare, and the harmony between individual freedom and community assistance.

universal basic combat poverty

Related Documents