Comparing Assessment Tools

docx

School

Chicago School of Professional Psychology *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

RESEARCH P

Subject

Psychology

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by ChiefHawkMaster890

Report
Compare and contrast the Stanford-Binet intellectual test, the Wechsler Scales, the Kaufman battery, and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities with regard to history, reliability, and validity. Based on the readings and other reliable supplemental resources, in your opinion describe which intellectual assessment tool is best and most ethical to administer to the population(s) you are interested in working with and explain the reasons. Students should address their choice in relation to not only reliability/validity, but also cultural background as well as other strengths and weaknesses of the tests. Please remember to base all opinions on evidence. Compare and contrast the Stanford-Binet intellectual test, the Wechsler Scales, the Kaufman battery, and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities with regard to history, reliability, and validity. o Stanford-Binet: this test, first developed in 1916, is one of the oldest and most widely used intelligence tests. It has a high reliability, with a coefficient often above .90. Its validity is also well-established, with strong correlations with academic achievement and other cognitive tests. However, it has been criticized for cultural bias, as it was developed primarily with Western populations. o Wechsler Scales: first developed in the 1930s, include the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC). These scales have high reliability and validity, with coefficients often above . 90. They are less culturally biased than the Stanford-Binet, as they include both verbal and performance subtests. o Kaufman Battery: the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC) was developed in the 1980s. It has a high reliability and validity, with coefficients often above .90. It is less culturally biased than the Stanford-Binet and Wechsler, as it includes nonverbal subtests and is available in multiple languages. o Woodcock-Johnson: The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities were developed in the 1970s. They have high reliability and validity, with coefficients often above . 90. They are less culturally biased than the Stanford-Binet, as they include both verbal and nonverbal subtests. Based on the readings and other reliable supplemental resources, in your opinion describe which intellectual assessment tool is best and
most ethical to administer to the population(s) you are interested in working with and explain the reasons. o In terms of choosing the best and most ethical tool, it depends on the population you are working with. For example, if you are working with a diverse population, the Kaufman Battery or Woodcock-Johnson might be the best choice due to their less cultural bias. o The choice of an assessment tool for a forensic setting largely depends on the specific needs of the case. However, the Wechsler Scales, specifically the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), is often favored in forensic settings. The WAIS is a widely used tool in forensic psychology due to its comprehensive nature. It assesses various aspects of cognitive functioning, including verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. This broad range of assessment can provide a detailed profile of an individual’s cognitive abilities, which can be crucial in forensic settings. o Moreover, the WAIS has strong psychometric properties, including high reliability and validity, making its results more defensible in court. It also has extensive normative data, allowing for comparisons across different populations. The WAIS includes an assessment of effort and malingering, which can be particularly useful in forensic settings where individuals may have a motivation to underperform. However, it is important to note that the choice of assessment tool should always be guided by the specific needs of the case and the individual being assessed. Other tests may be more appropriate depending on the context. Students should address their choice in relation to not only reliability/validity, but also cultural background as well as other strengths and weaknesses of the tests. Please remember to base all opinions on evidence. o Reliability/Validity: the Wechsler Scales have been extensively tested and revised over the years to ensure they provide consistent and accurate measures of cognitive abilities. The scales have high internal consistency (the degree to which different items that propose to measure the same general construct produce similar scores) and test-retest reliability (the degree to which the same test produces similar results at different times). o Cultural Background: The Wechsler Scales have been criticized for cultural bias. The tests were developed in Western societies and may not accurately reflect the
cognitive abilities of individuals from different cultural backgrounds. However, efforts have been made to adapt the tests for use in different cultures and languages, and to reduce cultural bias in the test items. o Strengths: The Wechsler Scales provide a detailed profile of an individual’s cognitive abilities, including both verbal and nonverbal skills. They are flexible in administration, allowing for breaks and changes in order based on the test-takers needs. The scales also have strong theoretical basis and have been extensively researched. o Weakness: Despite their strengths, the Wechsler Scales do have some limitations. They can be time-consuming not administer and score. They may also be less accurate for individuals with certain disabilities or those from culturally diverse backgrounds. Additionally, the scales focus primarily on cognitive abilities and do not provide a comprehensive assessment of other aspects of intelligence, such as creativity or emotional intelligence.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help