Here are my results

docx

School

Clayton State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1000

Subject

Psychology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by CaptainKomodoDragon3151

Report
Here are my results Staying Alive: Post-Mortem Sorry! You're dead! You chose: Round 1: It's the teletransporter for me Round 2: I'll take the silicon, thanks Round 3: Let my body die Here's the problem. There are basically three kinds of things that could be required for the continued existence of your self. One is bodily continuity, which may actually require only that parts of the body stay in existence (i.e., the brain). Another is psychological continuity, which requires the continuance of your consciousness - by which is meant your thoughts, ideas, memories, plans, beliefs, and so on. The third possibility is the continued existence of some kind of immaterial part of you, which might be called the soul. Of course, it may be the case that a combination of one or more types of these continuity is required for you to survive. Your first two choices were consistent with the view that psychological continuity is necessary for survival. In Round 1, you decided to have your body zapped and rebuilt from scratch, and in Round 2 you decided to have your brain replaced by synthetic parts. Both these choices give you psychological continuity. But your last choice sees the end to your psychological continuity, since the continued existence of the soul does not provide it. So you first ended bodily continuity and then you ended psychological continuity. Perhaps you made these choices because all along you thought that the continuity of the soul is what counts? If so, there is still a puzzle. How could teletransportation or replacing your organic body with synthetic parts ensure that your soul continues to exist? After all, the teletransporter transmits information about body states. Why would the soul
follow this information? Given the lack of reasons to suppose a soul would do this, you have been pronounced dead. (Although technically speaking you haven't so much died as lost track of where your soul has gone.) However, it is conceded that the autopsy is not absolutely conclusive.The review that comes after the "Staying Alive" experiment offers a provocative logical analysis of survival criteria and individual identity. It explores the relationship between physical reliability, mental stability, and the idea of the soul, challenging participants to think about the kind of continuation necessary for their existence.After giving it some attention, I believe the assessment is insightful and relates with a number of different philosophical questions about personal identity. The experiment's results make sense when viewed from a sense of self perspective, which emphasizes psychological continuity. Decisions like accepting brain replacement with silicon chips and choosing teleportation put psychological characteristics and memories ahead of physical integrity. This adherence to psychological continuity is consistent with Descartes' view that the mind is the source of all identity. Yet, the evaluation indicates a conflict in the participant's decisions regarding the ultimate choice between freezing and resurrecting the body. The participant chooses to give up psychological continuity by allowing the body to die, which raises concerns regarding the significance of the soul in defining a person's identity. The inconsistency between decisions taken and the soul's alleged existence highlights how difficult it is to reconcile different ideas of human identity. According to Descartes' notion of personal identity, there is an eternal soul or mind that endures despite physical changes in the body. Although the experimenter's decisions could have at first seemed to support Descartes' soul-based theory, the conclusion puts doubt on this notion by emphasizing the distinction between the psychological and physical aspects of identity.
However, Hume's no-self theory, which argues that perceptions continue without a substantial self, argues that personal identity originates from the ongoing existence of perceptions rather than from a real self, aligns with the assessment's focus on psychological continuity. The participant's decisions place a high value on maintaining memories and consciousness, which is consistent with Hume's thesis regarding the flux and continuity of mental states. The "Staying Alive" experiment, in conclusion, provides an engaging examination of individual identity and survival via a perspective of continuity and change. It forces participants to face the complexity of identity and poses significant questions on the nature of identity in connection to physical and mental characteristics. Deeper reflection on the relationship of philosophy and human experience is encouraged by the conflict between the decisions made and the final result.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help