Discussion Five PSY 205

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

205

Subject

Psychology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by MatePower3535

Report
Discussion Five Hello everyone, Distinguishing between a reasonable and unreasonable sentence involves assessing several factors. A reasonable sentence is typically: 1. Proportionality: The punishment should fit the crime. A reasonable sentence is one that is not excessively harsh or lenient given the severity of the offense. 2. Consistency: Similar crimes should result in similar sentences. This ensures fairness and predictability in the justice system. 3. Individual Circumstances: The sentence should consider the offender's personal history, including past criminal behavior, mental health, and socio- economic status. 4. Purpose of Sentencing: The sentence should serve the purposes of punishment, deterrence, rehabilitation, and protection of the public. A forensic psychologist's sentencing evaluation can significantly impact what is considered a reasonable sentence by providing expert analysis on the psychological factors relevant to the case. This may include factors such as mental health issues, trauma, or other psychological conditions that could warrant a more lenient sentence (Costanzo, 2020). The forensic psychologist may do a risk assessment evaluation. The evaluation may assess the risk of reoffending, helping the court determine appropriate measures for rehabilitation or community safety. A forensic psychologist's sentencing evaluation contributes crucial insights into the psychological aspects of a case, shaping a more nuanced and informed perspective that can impact the determination of a reasonable and just sentence. After reading about the changes to the Sentencing Reform Act, I would have to say I disagree with the Supreme Court decisions to grant more discretion to federal judges. I feel that judges may abuse their power. When abused, it can have a negative impact on the court's authority and good standing, foster a sense of decision- making that is goal-oriented, and result in egregious injustice. However, by having guidelines, it would provide certainty and fairness in sentencing while also reducing sentencing disparities. Costanzo, M., & Krauss, D. (2020). Forensic and Legal Psychology (4th ed.). Macmillan Higher Education. https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9781319352172
"Sentencing Reform Act (1984) ." Major Acts of Congress. . Retrieved February 07, 2024 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias- almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sentencing-reform-act-1984
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help