Social Change and Community Planning

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

442

Subject

Psychology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

7

Uploaded by kristawehr

Report
Social Change and Community Planning 4-2 Annotated Bibliography Krista Wehr Southern New Hampshire University PSY 442: Community Psychology
4-2 Annotated Bibliography: Social Change and Community Planning Article One: Family and community approaches to intimate partner violence: Restorative programs in the United States. Violence Against Women. (2021). Written By: Pennell, J., Burford, G., Sasson, E., Packer, H., & Smith, E. L . Pennell-Burford-Sasson-Packer-Smith-2020.Family-and- Community-Approaches-to-Intimate-Partner-Violence_-Restorative-Programs-in-the-United-States.pdf (nnedv.org) The article examines how the use of restorative approaches and to rethink our reliance on legal intervention and to help end Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). Arrest, incarceration, and family separation have fallen on people who are of color, impoverished, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ). The use of restorative approach brings together the victims, the perpetrators, the families also the communities. “Based on a U.S. national study, this article examines: What influences programs to adopt a restorative approach to ending IPV? How do programs safeguard their original vision for social change? What principles guide the programs in carrying out their work in safe and productive ways?” (Pennell, J., Burford, G., Sasson, E., Packer, H., & Smith, E. L., 2021). Also, in this article it states that females have raised some valid objections for using the restorative approaches precisely when it involves IPV because with their current or former partners as they can have ongoing contact or that they still live together, as they may have children together, or that they may reside in the same neighborhood/ town. In the article they have did 15 samples, 10 of them being PMCs and five being FGCs each program have addressed domestic violence, and only half also addressed sexual assault.
Article Two: An Examination of Whether Coordinated Community Responses Affect Intimate Partner Violence An Examination of Whether
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Coordinated Community Responses Affect Intimate Partner Violence An Examination of Whether Coordinated Community
Responses Affect Intimate Partner Violence An Examination of Whether Coordinated Community Responses Affect Intimate Partner Violence
An examination of whether coordinated community responses affect intimate partner violence. (2010). Written by: Post, L. A., Klevens, J., Maxwell, C. D., Shelley, G. A., & Ingram, E. (PDF) An Examination of Whether Coordinated Community Responses Affect Intimate Partner Violence (researchgate.net) This study tests the impact of coordinated community response (CCR) on reducing intimate partner violence (IPV) and on modifying knowledge and attitudes. The article shows studies that tested the impact of coordinated community response (CCR) by reducing intimate partner violence (IPV) to modify the knowledge that we have out there. IPV is a problem that is becoming a public problem with physical and emotional consequences within the society, the victims, and families. In the past 35 years communities have only focused on providing the victims and their children with shelter and counseling. The U.S. Congress has funded nonprofit organizations in 1995 to help various community to coordinate IPV intervention and prevention efforts (Public Law 103-322, section 40261). “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded six Coordinated Community Response (CCR) projects in 1996 with the purpose of enhancing community coalitions and coordinated community responses for preventing IPV and providing services to reduce injury and death” (Post, L. A., Klevens, J., Maxwell, C. D., Shelley, G. A., & Ingram, E. 2010). A random sample was done on a sample size of 600 adults that were randomly selected by using random-digit dial (RDD) techniques (total N = 12,039). The survey they used relied on their “next-birthday method of respondent selection, whereby a request was made by the
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
telephone interviewer for the person above the age of 18 (by the next birthday) in the household” by using strongly agree/ strongly disagree a 1–5-point scale (Post, L. A., Klevens, J., Maxwell, C. D., Shelley, G. A., & Ingram, E. 2010). Of 12,039 respondents that were in the sample were White, middle aged, and moderately educated, half were female and married with an annual income of more than $43,000. The study looked at twenty-three communities believing that every 3 out of 5 females were/ are victims of IPV. (Saltzman, Green, Marks, & Thacker, 2000). In the