Untitled document.edited (31)

docx

School

Kenyatta University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

ORGANIC CH

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by ballbully36

Report
Name Institution Course Instructor Date Hirsch, J. S., Khan, S. R., Wamboldt, A., & Mellins, C. A. (2019). Social dimensions of sexual consent among cisgender heterosexual college students: Insights from ethnographic research. Journal of Adolescent Health , 64 (1), 26-35 . For cisgender heterosexual college students, Hirsch et al. (2019) investigate the complex social aspects of sexual consent. The authors use a qualitative research technique to give a unique and comprehensive account of how students navigate the challenging subject of sexuality in relationships. Using this method, the student's experiences are placed in a crucial context, and a deeper subjective understanding of the subject is obtained than from limited statistical data. Because they used a psychological technique, the authors were able to convey the complex and varied ways that college-aged individuals understand and handle sexual consent. Researchers can learn more about the social environment, customs, and individual dynamics that affect the consent process for making decisions by placing themselves in the subjects' positions. The source's addition significantly advances the field's study of sex consent. It gives real-world stories and examples that explain the challenges, misunderstandings, and coping techniques they encounter while navigating sexual consent. This qualitative setting might be helpful for professionals and scholars working on
concepts like consent education and support on college campuses. Walsh, K., Honickman, S., Valdespino-Hayden, Z., & Lowe, S. R. (2019). Dual measures of sexual consent: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Internal Consent Scale and External Consent Scale. The Journal of Sex Research , 56 (6), 802–810 . By creating and evaluating the External Consent Scale and the Internal Consent Factor, this study considerably expands on the understanding of sexual consent. These scales offer an innovative method for evaluating sexual consent that makes a more thorough examination possible. The study's measures may now be used for quantitative research in this sector thanks to the use of validation analysis of variables. Given that this source offers a consistent and standardized approach to assessing both subjective and objective components of sexual consent, using its findings can significantly enhance the study's value. It is essential to distinguish between external and interior types of consent in order to understand the complexities of consent in sexual experiences. These indications allow for clear comparisons across different aspects of the idea, which gives researchers a vital tool for exploring the complexity of sexual consent. Evaluation of these instruments resulted in a strong empirical foundation for the use of these scales, which improves research results' dependability and encourages more accurate data collection. Finally, scholars wishing to compare and contrast various facets of sexual consent in a methodical and empirically supported way would find Walsh et al.'s (2019) work to be a useful tool. Walsh, K., Sarvet, A. L., Wall, M., Gilbert, L., Santelli, J., Khan, S., ... & Mellins, C. A. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of sexual assault perpetration and ambiguous consent in a representative sample of college students. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence , 36 (13-14), NP7005-NP7026. The research conducted by Walsh et al. (2021) provides essential information on the rate and consequences of sexual assault crimes and uncertain consent among college students. Strong evidence from this study supports including these issues in preventive and educational initiatives for the entire campus. The research shows how common sexual assault is and how little is known about it, underscoring the broad reach of these problems. It further emphasizes the need for proactive measures to deal with these problems. Additionally, by discovering links between things like drug abuse, societal factors, and individual views, educational institutions may gather the information needed to provide targeted solutions. Academic institutions can use this knowledge to develop comprehensive programs that support consent and tolerance education, the help of others, and the development of a culture that values respectful and open communication. The research's findings apply to legislators, academic administrators, and activists striving to make educational institutions safer for all students. To lower the incidence of sexual assault on college campuses and to promote a culture of consent and acceptance among students, this research is a valuable resource. Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Sexual precedent's effect on sexual consent communication. Archives of Sexual Behaviour , 48 , 1723-1734. The 2019 study by Willis and Jozkowski is a crucial source of information about how our past sexual experiences might influence our understanding and use of sexual consent. An individual's capacity to effectively communicate and negotiate permission is examined concerning previous sexual interactions. We may overcome
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
barriers, miscommunications, and low confidence by realizing how past experiences can either encourage or hinder our abilities to manage these talks. Researchers can alter the courses they provide to address better the requirements of persons whose circumstances are affected by their background, and students can benefit from learning about the value of informed consent through this study's findings. By considering all of the different aspects that make consent education so hard, this research contributes to the continuing discussion. Yule, K., & Grych, J. (2020). College students' perceptions of barriers to bystander intervention. Journal of interpersonal violence , 35 (15-16), 2971-2992. This source highlights the demanding situations that scholars come upon when considering documenting suspected sexual attacks on campus. According to the study, numerous barriers prevent students from performing in sexually suggestive or unlawful settings, like ignorance, peer influence, fear of possible outcomes, and safety concerns. These findings are essential for understanding the complicated nature of supporting bystanders in educational institutions and setting the rules for preventative measures. To effectively address these situations, comprehensive instructional activities that raise awareness, create a supportive environment, and enable peer-to-peer encouragement are required. Students can succeed in those demanding situations and take suitable actions, when necessary, with the support of high-quality role models and private reporting systems, making the college surroundings a safer and more welcoming.
References Hirsch, J. S., Khan, S. R., Wamboldt, A., & Mellins, C. A. (2019). Social dimensions of sexual consent among cisgender heterosexual college students: Insights from ethnographic research. Journal of Adolescent Health , 64 (1), 26-35. Walsh, K., Honickman, S., Valdespino-Hayden, Z., & Lowe, S. R. (2019). Dual measures of sexual consent: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Internal Consent Scale and External Consent Scale. The Journal of Sex Research , 56 (6), 802-810. Walsh, K., Sarvet, A. L., Wall, M., Gilbert, L., Santelli, J., Khan, S., ... & Mellins, C. A. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of sexual assault perpetration and ambiguous consent in a representative sample of college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 36 (13-14), NP7005-NP7026. Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Sexual precedent's effect on sexual consent communication. Archives of Sexual Behaviour , 48 , 1723-1734. Yule, K., & Grych, J. (2020). College students' perceptions of barriers to bystander intervention. Journal of interpersonal violence , 35 (15-16), 2971-2992.