A Comparative Analysis

docx

School

Notre Dame College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

345

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by juma3333

A Comparative Analysis: Reliability and Validity in Educational Research Student’s Name Institution Course Name/No. Professor Date Introduction In educational research, just like in any research study, ensuring the reliability and validity of tests used is crucial for generating credible and meaningful results. Researchers use various methods to establish the reliability and validity of their tests to ensure that their results are accurate and trustworthy. This paper aims to examine six different reported studies that include information on the reliability and validity of the tests used during their research. The chosen studies cover manifold aspects of education, ranging from instructional practices, cooperative classrooms and personality assessment models to the impact of emotional intelligence on academic performance and perceived stress. On top of discussing the methods used to support their reliability and the type of validity addressed using specific tests and methodological procedures, the paper will also identify similarities and differences in the ways that each researcher tries to support their completed work. In the end, while assessing whether any gaps exist in substantiating the significance of the overall research, the paper will explore how ethical considerations were addressed by the authors in their respective studies. Methods Used to Support Reliability and Establish Validity

Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of measurements. It ensures that if a study were to be repeated under similar conditions, it would yield similar results. On the other end, Validity refers to the extent to which a test measures what it is intended to measure. It is about the accuracy and meaningfulness of the inferences drawn from the data. Overall, the studies chosen for this paper used different methods to support and establish the reliability and validity of their research. For instance, Pons and Reyes (2021) explore the reliability and factorial validity of responsible talk and its impact on cooperative classrooms using a mixed-methods approach. They use confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the factorial validity of their instrument. Charalambous et al. (2017) explore the reliability of generic and content-specific instructional aspects in physical education lessons using a quantitative approach. To assess the internal consistency reliability of their instrument, they employ Cronbach's alpha coefficient. This statistical measure quantifies the degree of interrelatedness among a set of items within a scale. In this case, it helps ensure that the items assessing instructional aspects in physical education lessons consistently measure the same underlying construct. By reporting the Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the study confirms the stability and consistency of their measurement tool. In another study, Sánchez-Meca et al. (2013) explore the validity of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) using a meta-analytic approach. They use Cohen's d effect size as a measure of construct validity. Cohen's d quantifies the standardized difference in means between groups or conditions. In this context, it indicates the extent to which the RSES can distinguish between individuals with different levels of self- esteem. By demonstrating significant effect sizes in their meta-analysis, the researchers provide evidence that the RSES is indeed a valid measure of self-esteem. Similarly, Chen et al. (2021) examine the reliability and validity of an instrument that measures the impact of a mindfulness program on medical students' well-being using a quantitative approach. They use CFA to test the factorial validity of their instrument. CFA helps ensure that the items they have selected for their measurement tool align with the theoretical constructs they aim to assess. By successfully confirming the factor structure, they enhance the construct validity of their instrument, demonstrating its reliability and meaningfulness. Furthermore, Gupta et al. (2017) investigated the predictive validity of emotional intelligence on first- year medical students' perceived stress. While not explicitly addressing reliability, they measured emotional intelligence using established instruments like the Schutte's Emotional Intelligence Scale (SEIS) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). These instruments have demonstrated reliability in previous research, ensuring that the measures used in Gupta et al.'s study are stable and consistent over time. By leveraging well-established tools, the researchers indirectly support the reliability and validity of their study's measures. Likewise, Dave et al. (2019) explored the role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI) in predicting post-secondary education pursuit. They employed longitudinal data and statistical analysis to ensure that TEI scores were consistent predictors over time. This longitudinal approach reinforces the reliability of TEI as a predictive measure. Furthermore, they establish the construct validity of TEI by showing that it effectively predicts students' educational decisions. Through these methods, Dave et al. provide strong evidence for both the reliability and validity of TEI in their study. Other studies, such as those by Li et al. (2018) and Zeng et al. (2020), used both quantitative and qualitative approaches to support the reliability and validity of their research instruments. Li et al. (2018) examined the reliability and validity of a survey instrument that measures Chinese college students' attitudes towards environmental protection. They used CFA to test the factorial validity of their instrument and conduct focus group interviews to confirm its content validity. Zeng et al. (2020) explored the reliability and validity of an instrument that measures Chinese primary school teachers' attitudes towards inclusive education using CFA and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Overall, this dual quantitative approach adds rigor to their assessment of reliability and construct validity.

Comparing Reliability and Validity across Studies: Similarities & Differences in Supporting Completed Work The selected studies address various types of reliability and validity. For instance, Pons and Reyes (2021) and Dave et al. (2019) both prioritize internal consistency reliability by using Cronbach's alpha. This statistical measure assesses how consistently the items within their scales measure the same underlying construct. By demonstrating a high level of internal consistency, these studies establish the reliability of their measurements, ensuring that the items within their scales consistently capture the intended concepts. In contrast, Charalambous et al. (2017) take a unique approach by focusing on inter-rater reliability . They employ multiple observers to independently assess instructional practices in physical education lessons. This method enhances inter-rater reliability as it involves different individuals assessing the same phenomena. By comparing their observations and ensuring agreement, the study bolsters the reliability of their measurements, highlighting the importance of consistency among observers. Laher and Mokone (2008) address the test-retest reliability of their assessments by using Pearson correlations to establish the consistency of scores over time. This method assesses whether the same individuals produce similar results when assessed on two different occasions, verifying the reliability of their measurements. Wen et al. (2022) introduce an innovative approach to assessing reliability by utilizing video analysis, a novel method, to evaluate the reliability of their measurements based on gait videos. This innovative technique expands the horizons of reliability assessment, ensuring the stability of their unique measure. Additionally, Jones and Davies (2023) employ the Elo rating system to ensure the reliability of rankings in their study on comparative judgment in education research. This system, commonly used in chess rankings, assesses the reliability of rankings by considering the consistency of preferences. By applying this system, they enhance the reliability of their comparative judgments, emphasizing the importance of consistency in ranking methods. Validity, another crucial aspect in research, is addressed in various ways across the studies. Pons and Reyes (2021) emphasize factorial validity , using factor analysis to establish the factorial validity of their instrument, Responsible Talk. This approach ensures that the items in their instrument correspond to the hypothesized latent constructs, confirming that their measurement model accurately represents the theoretical framework. Charalambous et al. (2017) assess the content validity of instructional aspects in physical education lessons, ensuring that their items align with the instructional aspects they aim to assess. Content validity focuses on whether the items in a measurement tool adequately cover the content domain of interest, thus establishing the relevance of their items. Laher and Mokone (2008) explore the construct validity of their assessment by comparing scores to other measures, demonstrating that their assessment aligns with the construct of interest by comparing it to external criteria. Dave et al. (2019) delve into the predictive validity of Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI), demonstrating that TEI scores predict students' educational choices over time. This establishes the predictive validity of TEI, indicating its ability to forecast future outcomes. Finally, Wen et al. (2022) introduce a novel assessment method based on gait videos and emphasize the need for further research to establish construct validity . This innovative approach challenges conventional methods of validity assessment, opening avenues for future research to confirm the meaningfulness of their measure. Existing Gaps in Substantiating the Significance of the Overall Research Despite the efforts made by researchers to establish the reliability and validity of their tests, there are still gaps in proving the significance of overall research. Firstly, a common limitation across these studies is their focus on specific populations, such as medical students or physical education lessons. While this

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

specialization allows for in-depth exploration, it raises questions about the generalizability of findings to broader contexts. To address this gap, researchers should conduct studies that encompass more diverse populations, ensuring that the reliability and validity of measurements are robust across various demographic groups. This expansion would enhance the external validity of their findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the instruments under investigation. Secondly, although ethical considerations are briefly mentioned in these studies, they often lack detailed discussions on ethical challenges. This is particularly important in research involving vulnerable populations, such as students or individuals with specific health conditions. Enhancing transparency by thoroughly addressing ethical concerns and detailing the steps taken to mitigate potential ethical issues would strengthen the ethical foundation of the research. Researchers should provide a comprehensive ethical framework that ensures the protection of participants' rights, informed consent, and ethical conduct throughout the study. Lastly, some studies, like Wen et al. (2022), acknowledge the need for further research to establish construct validity. While this recognition is valuable, future studies should prioritize comprehensive validity assessments. Construct validity, in particular, is essential for ensuring that the measurements effectively capture the intended theoretical constructs. Researchers should employ a range of methods, such as convergent and discriminant validity analyses, to thoroughly evaluate construct validity. By addressing these gaps, researchers can enhance the robustness and applicability of their findings in both research and practical contexts. Ethical Considerations The selected articles present ethical considerations that were necessary for their research including issues related to informed consent, privacy, and the potential impact of research on participants. For instance, Pons and Reyes (2021) obtained informed consent from their participants before collecting data, whereas Charalambous et al. (2017) ensured that their participants' anonymity was protected by assigning pseudonyms. Similarly, Li et al. (2018) obtained approval from their university's ethics committee before conducting their research. Chen et al. (2021) obtained informed consent from their participants and ensured that their data were kept confidential. In effect, all these reflected ethical awareness. However, others, like Wen et al. (2022), do not extensively discuss ethical considerations, suggesting room for improvement in reporting ethical practices. Overall, ethical considerations in the selected studies appear to be addressed to varying degrees, indicating a need for greater consistency and transparency in reporting ethical protocols. Conclusion Reliability and validity are integral aspects of educational research, ensuring the trustworthiness and quality of findings. The six studies examined in this essay offer diverse approaches to addressing these concepts. Researchers employ various methods to establish reliability and validity, depending on their research context. Ethical considerations are fundamental, with researchers emphasizing informed consent, anonymity, and minimizing harm. While these studies contribute valuable insights, there is room for improvement; a phenomenon implying that although there are similarities in supporting completed work, there are also differences in how researchers try to establish these aspects. This is compounded by the existence of some gaps in proving the significance of overall research due to limited information on sample selection or potential sources of bias. Thus, there is a need for researchers to consider the generalizability of findings, provide more detailed discussions of ethical considerations, and prioritize comprehensive validity assessments. In doing so, educational research can continue to advance our understanding of learning, teaching, and assessment practices.

References Pons, R. M., & Reyes, V. (2021). Exploring Reliability and Factorial Validity of Responsible Talk and its Impact on Cooperative Classrooms. Frontiers in Education , 6 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.702013 Charalambous, C. Y., Kyriakides, E., Tsangaridou, N., & Kyriakidēs, L. (2017). Exploring the reliability of generic and content-specific instructional aspects in physical education lessons. School Effectiveness and School Improvement , 28 (4), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1311929 Laher, S., & Mokone, M. (2008). Exploring the reliability and validity of the DAT-K in grade 11 learners in a historically disadvantaged school in Johannesburg, South Africa. Journal of Psychology in Africa , 18 (2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2008.10820193 Wen, Y., Li, B., Chen, D., & Zhu, T. (2022). Reliability and validity analysis of personality assessment model based on gait video. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience , 16 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.901568 Jones, I., & Davies, B. T. (2023). Comparative judgement in education research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2023.2242273 Dave, H. P., Keefer, K. V., Snetsinger, S. W., Holden, R. R., & Parker, J. D. A. (2019). Predicting the pursuit of Post-Secondary Education: Role of Trait Emotional intelligence in a Longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01182 Peeters, M. J., Beltyukova, S. A., & Martin, B. A. (2013). Educational testing and validity of conclusions in the scholarship of teaching and learning. The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education , 77 (9), 186. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe779186 Gupta, R., Singh, N. R., & Kumar, R. (2017). Longitudinal predictive validity of emotional intelligence on first year medical students perceived stress. BMC Medical Education , 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0979-z

A Comparative Analysis

Related Documents