IDIS Assignment 3
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Baltimore *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
302
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by SuperHumanAtomVulture26
Shane Chikerema
IDIS 302 Assignment 3
Authors write books from their perspective. Authors have the freedom to write their art from
their perspective. Writing comes in many different views. They vary from the LGBT perspective,
Minority perspective, Criminals perspective, and all types of perspectives. As parents and
guardians, we must ensure that our children consume content appropriate for their age. In the
article, some parents say they do not send kids to school so the schools can raise their kids.
Instead, they send their kids to receive an education. Raising kids is the job of parents and
families, not schools. Others believe we should respect the rights and well-being of LGBTQ+
students.
Regarding consumption, should we restrict certain books for young people? That is the
question. When, if ever, is it morally permissible to ban a book from a school or public library?
Whether banning a book from a school or public library is morally permissible is a complex and
controversial issue.
On the one hand, freedom of expression and access to information are fundamental to a
democratic society. Individuals can express their ideas and opinions and access various
information and perspectives. On the other hand, there may be circumstances where it is
justifiable to ban a book. For example, if a book contains material that promotes hate speech,
violence, or discrimination, it may be necessary to prevent it from being disseminated in a
school or public library. Ultimately, any decision to ban a book should be taken cautiously and
based on careful consideration of the specific circumstances and potential impact on free
speech and the exchange of ideas. Do teachers have a moral responsibility to encourage
discussion and inclusion of diverse perspectives and identities in coursework? Yes, teachers
have a moral responsibility to encourage discussion and inclusion of diverse perspectives and
identities in coursework. Education is about imparting knowledge and skills and creating an
environment where students feel safe to express themselves and learn from others. Teachers
can help students develop empathy, critical thinking, and a more nuanced understanding of the
world by including diverse perspectives and identities in coursework. Moreover, it is essential to
acknowledge and challenge biases and stereotypes in the curriculum. What behaviors might
such a responsibility prescribe?
To encourage discussion and inclusion of diverse perspectives and identities in coursework,
teachers should engage in ongoing professional development, seek out diverse resources and
perspectives, and create a classroom culture that values respectful dialogue and active listening.
They should also be aware of power dynamics in the classroom and take steps to ensure that all
students have a voice. They are using inclusive language, providing opportunities for students to
share their experiences, and being open to feedback from students. What say, if any, should
parents have over what their children consume in school? Parents have a legitimate interest in
their children's education and should be involved in their learning. However, this does not mean
parents should have complete control over what their children consume. The curriculum should
include educational standards and goals, and teachers should be able to select appropriate
resources and methods to meet those goals. At the same time, teachers should be open to
communication with parents and address any concerns respectfully and constructively. With the
categorical imperative,
Kant posed vital questions What if everyone banned books, they deemed offensive? Would
banning books become a universal law? The categorical imperative is a moral principle
developed by philosopher Immanuel Kant, which states that an action is only morally justifiable
if used as a general law. In the context of banning books, this principle raises questions about
the consistency and fairness of such a decision. For example, if everyone were to ban books,
they deemed offensive, it would lead to limited ideas and perspectives, and censorship would
become the norm. Therefore, any decision to ban a book should carefully consider the specific
circumstances and the potential impact on free speech and the exchange of ideas. The
categorical imperative encourages us to consider our actions' broader implications and the
principles underlying our moral decisions.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help