radical skepticism and scientism
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Grand Canyon University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
103
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by CountFalconPerson186
1
Radical Skepticism and Scientism
Grand Canyon University
Tahlia Glass
Gary Osmundsen
10/8/2023
2
Radical Skepticism and Scientism
Introduction:
The extent to which we can know anything about the outside world is a subject of radical
skepticism. It uses doubt on the notion that reality accurately represents our senses and
perceptions. It raises doubt that we can never be completely confident that there is a universe
outside of our own thoughts and experiences. Scientism, on the other hand, is a viewpoint that
only emphasizes scientific procedures as the sole valid means to learn new things. It claims that
the most reliable and trustworthy method for comprehending the world and finding solutions is
the study of science. Scientism frequently favors scientific facts over other types of knowledge,
such as philosophical or subjective insights, and dismisses both. Let's look at how radical
skepticism undermines our comprehension of reality and how scientism shapes how we view
knowledge and the truth. Scientism emphasizes the value of scientific investigation in learning
whereas radical skepticism challenges us to critically assess our presumptions and question our
understanding of reality. The details and consequences of these two perspectives will be further
discussed in this essay.
Radical Skepticism:
Radical skepticism is a philosophical position that challenges the idea of knowledge
certainty and questions the extent to which we can trust our senses and reasoning. It takes a
highly skeptical approach to all claims of knowledge, arguing that we cannot truly know
anything beyond doubt. Radical skeptics argue that our senses can be deceptive, and our
reasoning may be flawed. In the Topic 2 Overview, “radical skepticism questions the likelihood
of discovering truth, which is crucial to Christian belief” (p.16).
Therefore, we cannot claim to
have any knowledge about the external world or even about our own thoughts and perceptions.
Radical skepticism expresses doubt on the assurance regarding knowledge and its effects on
different aspects of life. It makes one wonder how anybody can know anything other than one's
own thoughts and experiences. As a result, it may have significant effects on how individuals
perceive ideas like God, each other, other people, and the universe. Radical skepticism
challenges the rationale for faith in a higher power, including God. It casts doubt on the accuracy
of religious claims and promotes a skepticism-based analysis of religious practices and beliefs. In
terms for the self, radical skepticism calls into question our conception of individual identity as
well as the validity of our own beliefs and experiences. It makes us wonder about the nature of
awareness and how much we can know about ourselves. Radical skepticism can pose certain
difficulties from a Christian worldview. As it calls into question the credibility of knowledge and
the ability to know anything other than their own thoughts and experiences, it has the potential to
undermine the foundations of faith and belief in God. Radical skepticism may put doubt on the
idea of sin as well as the existence of universal moral standards. It creates doubt on the
assumption that there are moral and universal truths that govern our behavior and interactions
with other people. Radical skepticism can also result in hopelessness and a feeling of existential
uncertainty.
Scientism
:
Scientism is the view that scientific research should be conducted in all areas of
discovery and that it is the only way to get trustworthy knowledge. It is a worldview that places
science in the position of having the final say while ignoring other non-scientific approaches to
understanding reality, such as those found in philosophy, art, or spirituality. Recognizing the
3
great worth and accomplishments of real sciences is crucial, but adopting scientism can have
negative repercussions. Scientism can result in a restricted focus on scientific data and the
neglect of other knowledge types, such philosophical or spiritual insights, in terms for science
itself. It might restrict the study of issues outside the scope of science, thereby ignoring parts of
the human experience that are difficult to determine or see. According to Woudenberg (2023),
“Strong Scientism: the claim that the methods of science are the only reliable ways to secure
knowledge of anything” (p.4). Scientism can be problematic when it comes to understanding
God. It favors factual data and naturalistic explanations, which may run counter to beliefs that
rely on revelation and trust. Religious experiences and spiritual revelations can minimize
skepticism as subjective or unreliable. Scientism can reduce people to simple biological and
psychological processes, dismissing the complexity of awareness, emotions, and the
individuality of people, both with relation to oneself and others. It could minimize the
significance of emotions, individualized narrative, and moral aspects of human existence. The
complexity and diversity of human experiences, cultural viewpoints, and the interconnection of
ecological systems may be neglected in favor of a simplified and mechanistic understanding of
nature in the world, according to scientism. There are several issues with scientism from a
Christian point of view that need to be addressed. First off, by limiting reality to only the
physical and realizable, scientism tends to restrict our comprehension of it. This perspective
downplays the importance of religious ideas and experiences and ignores the spiritual
dimensions of human existence.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both scientism and radical skepticism have natural disadvantages. While
scientism might limit our understanding by valuing only direct proof and eliminating other
important forms of knowing, excessive skepticism can paralyze knowledge and result in the
denial of any form of truth. Striking a balance between accepting the scientific process and
appreciating the worth of other perspectives and experiences is important. We can encourage a
more comprehensive understanding of the world and our place in it by approaching questions
with openness and intellectual humility. Radical skepticism and scientism might be viewed as
being incompatible with the Christian worldview because they go against Christianity's core
values and tenets. Radical skepticism questions the likelihood of discovering truth, which is
crucial to Christian belief. Christianity places an intense focus on spiritual insights, unique
personal experiences, and a relationship with God. Those things that may not be entirely
compatible with skepticism or a strictly scientific framework.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
References
Topic 2 Overview
Woudenberg, R. van. (2023). Argumentative strategies against scientism: an
overview.
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
,
48
(2), 411–426. https://doi-
org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/03080188.2023.2167398