Team Contribution Form.1.7.24

docx

School

Arizona State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

435

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by GrandJayMaster130

Team Contribution Form Individual Assignment: Purpose: This form is to appraise how you and your team members participated in a team project. Also, this gives your instructor insight into your group dynamics. The expectation is that each student is fully involved and will be scored accordingly. We understand that challenges will occur on your teams and we feel this is a way in which we can assess each individual’s ability to fully participate/communicate in teamwork. Directions:  Fill out Part I and II of the word document.  In the first row below, type in each person’s name, including your own.  Using the left-hand column rate yourself and your team members on how well they met these expectations by using a scale of 0-2 (Fully Met Expectation=2, Somewhat met expectation=1, Did Not Meet Expectation=0).  Add the final scores in row 8.  Proceed to Part II  Upload this Word Doc to your assignment page. Jazmin Gonzalez Caitlin Richter Amanda Forest Corina Terrill Elissa David Grace Nightengale Answer the questions below. Part I Initiated and facilitated team processes through established team guidelines and responsibilities. Provide a score between 0-2 pts. 2 2 2 2 2 2 Generated ideas and participated fully throughout each phase of the project. Provide a score between 0-2 pts. 2 2 2 2 2 2 Managed and submitted work in the time that 2 2 2 2 2 2

was agreed upon. Provide a score between 0-2 pts. Communicated in a timely, positive, and respectful manner through the team's chosen communication platform. Provide a score between 0-2 pts. 2 2 2 1 2 1 Add up the total score for each team member and place in this row below their name. Their score should reflect their overall ability to participate/communicate in the team assignment from beginning to end. The total points possible for each person: 8 pts. 8 8 8 7 8 7 Part II Describe in detail what each member contributed to this project, including yourself. (Example: prompts/questions each person addressed and/or slides each person was responsible for). This may not be a repetition of the above evaluation I chose the self- actualization personality test and discussed its accuracy along with answering the question asking for the difference between being committed to your values versus imposing beliefs onto others and the She analyzed her results from the Freudian personality test and completed the question that asked about the importance of clarity in your values in terms of leadership skills. She took the Myers Briggs 16 types personality test and described it’s accuracy and completed the question that asked what a role model was and how they are important to She was originally supposed to complete the introduction and conclusion paragraphs plus the personality test instead of answering a question but misunderstood and She completed an analysis of her results from the Truity Enneagram Test and answered the question regarding the benefits of shared values. She was always the first one to respond when She took and analyzed her results from the Freudian personality test along with writing the introduction. She was hard to get a hold of while working on the assignment as her work schedule was

in part I. You will lose points if enough detail is not provided. importance of understanding the difference in healthcare. I also looked through the text to fix any spelling and grammar mistakes for the team along with another member. I rewrote a few sentences with the permission of the members to make the essay flow smoothly. She made it clear when she wanted group members to complete their parts so she could submit the paper on time. She also informed the group to go back and shorten our writing to be within or a little bit over the page limit. healthcare leadership. She was the group member who helped me look for grammar and spelling mistakes throughout the essay along with fixing the formatting. didn’t ask for clarification. She ended up doing the conclusion, personality test analysis, and the question having to do with “finding your voice”. This confused the group and we had to rediscuss what our assigned parts were. someone had a question about the paper and its format. She made sure that the format of the paper met the APA standards. very spontaneous this week. She did manage to turn in her parts on time despite that and the mix-up that occurred with Corina. However, she did not assist with the editing of the paper other than making some changes to her parts. If the instructors need to be aware of any further concerns, problems, or questions regarding individual team members, the team as a whole, or assignment questions/concerns please address them in the box to the right. You may also reach out to us for assistance via email or phone. There are currently no signs of major issues regarding our teamwork. All concerns or questions we had while completing this assignment have been addressed in our class group chat and was resolved in a timely and appropriate manner.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version