Group-3 Assignment 1 Variable GRR (Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility) SAmple

pptx

School

Centennial College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

257

Subject

Management

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pptx

Pages

10

Uploaded by MegaOxidePanther34

Report
QUALITY ASSURANCE- MANUFACTURING & MANAGEMENT QUAL8300-Quality Core Tools II Group Assignment # 1 - (Variable GRR) Date- 8 th June 2023 Professor- Victor Nicolas (Group-3)Student names:- Patel Dipen- (8882504) Champaneri Biren- (8796359) Sakariya Nikunj- (8876987)
Introduction This Assignment consists of the measurement data of ten parts. Each parts is measured by three different operators individually and is recorded in a table. The variation in the data is analyzed using Minitab software and results are evaluated using graphs. A statistical method called Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R) is used to evaluate a measuring system's ability to consistently and accurately measure parts over time. To determine the measuring system's accuracy and precision as well as to identify any potential reasons for measurement process variability, a Gauge R&R study is performed. Repeated measurements of the same component using the same tool are part of the inquiry, and the data are analyzed to determine measurement process variability. It is possible to enhance the measurement process, thereby enhancing the precision and accuracy of the measurements. 2
Procedure to conduct the GRR Studies 1. Check the measurement device resolution. 2. Ensure the measurement device is Accurate. 3. Collect parts to be measured and ensure the parts are not familiar to the appraiser. 4. Determine who does the gage R&R, and appraisers was chosen. 5. Three appraisers are required to measure the dimension of all ten parts. 6. Each member of the group took ten measurements of each sample. 7. The measurements were entered in the specified format into an excel sheet. 8. Then the data is transferred to Minitab 9. Used Minitab's Gage R&R research. 10. Minitab > data > Stat > Quality tools > Gauge study > Gauge R&R study (crossed). 11. Received data for a different interpretation. 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
GRR data-measurements 4 Part Number Appraiser Trial Value 1 A 1 4.505 2 A 1 4.445 3 A 1 4.295 4 A 1 4.452 5 A 1 4.449 6 A 1 4.433 7 A 1 4.753 8 A 1 4.424 9 A 1 4.576 10 A 1 4.542 1 B 1 4.506 2 B 1 4.46 3 B 1 4.296 4 B 1 4.458 5 B 1 4.445 6 B 1 4.437 7 B 1 4.759 8 B 1 4.437 9 B 1 4.578 10 B 1 4.545 1 C 1 4.512 2 C 1 4.458 3 C 1 4.296 4 C 1 4.456 5 C 1 4.449 6 C 1 4.438 7 C 1 4.753 8 C 1 4.434 9 C 1 4.571 10 C 1 4.536 Part Number Appraiser Trial Value 1 A 2 4.507 2 A 2 4.47 3 A 2 4.292 4 A 2 4.431 5 A 2 4.426 6 A 2 4.382 7 A 2 4.762 8 A 2 4.448 9 A 2 4.525 10 A 2 4.532 1 B 2 4.503 2 B 2 4.479 3 B 2 4.292 4 B 2 4.436 5 B 2 4.425 6 B 2 4.385 7 B 2 4.752 8 B 2 4.445 9 B 2 4.522 10 B 2 4.527 1 C 2 4.509 2 C 2 4.478 3 C 2 4.295 4 C 2 4.429 5 C 2 4.422 6 C 2 4.386 7 C 2 4.759 8 C 2 4.442 9 C 2 4.523 10 C 2 4.524 Part Number Appraiser Trial Value 1 A 3 4.522 2 A 3 4.465 3 A 3 4.292 4 A 3 4.388 5 A 3 4.431 6 A 3 4.386 7 A 3 4.755 8 A 3 4.452 9 A 3 4.526 10 A 3 4.529 1 B 3 4.511 2 B 3 4.435 3 B 3 4.288 4 B 3 4.39 5 B 3 4.442 6 B 3 4.392 7 B 3 4.76 8 B 3 4.429 9 B 3 4.519 10 B 3 4.523 1 C 3 4.503 2 C 3 4.435 3 C 3 4.281 4 C 3 4.396 5 C 3 4.43 6 C 3 4.391 7 C 3 4.747 8 C 3 4.43 9 C 3 4.539 10 C 3 4.526
GRR results: 2 tables, all graphs. 5
What is the %GRR in terms of %Study Variation? Is the measurement system acceptable? Why? What source is the highest contributor to the measurement system variation? Why? %GRR (Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility) in relation to %Study Variation is a metric that quantifies the portion of the overall study variation resulting from the measurement system's repeatability and reproducibility. GRR, which means Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility, is a statistical indicator of a measurement system or gauge's accuracy. It assesses a gauge's capacity to deliver accurate and repeatable measurements. Here %study variations are used to compare the measurement system variation to the total variation. We used ANOVA since this method also counts the operator-to-part interaction. In gage evaluation, the total gage R&R is 0.016574, and the total variation is 0.121948. and to get the %study var, we need to divide the total gage by the total variation multiplied by 100. After that, we got 13.59%; since it is less than 30%, the measurement system is acceptable according to the guidelines because there are not too many variations between each measurement from the gauge. The standard deviation for repeatability is 0.016574, and for reproducibility, it is 0. then you multiply the standard deviation by 6 to get the study variance 0.099442 and 0 are the study variance for repeatability and reproducibility, respectively. Since repeatability has the highest study variance, it is the source of the highest contributor. This is because the variance caused by the same operator, gage and part is high. That appraiser is C. From looking into the graphs; the appraiser C has a lot of variances and is the major contributor to the variance. In Gage R&R (ANOVA) Report shows high variation from part to part in both % contribution and % study variation and for Gage R&R it shows more variation in % study variation. From R chart the sample values are under limit. X-bar chart by appraiser shows that the sample mean with the part numbers are out of UCL and LCL. Value by part number variation is very low for all trails. Value by Appraiser follows the equality range. All Appraiser A,B AND C are performing the same action throughout. 6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
What is the Number of Distinct Categories (ndc)? What does it mean? What is the precision of the measurement system? What percentage of the Total Variation does the measurement system consume? The Number of Distinct Categories (ndc) represents the count of unique categories within a categorical variable. It provides insight into the diversity and variability of the data. NDC value greater than or equal to 5 means measuring equipment is acceptable, whereas if it is less than 5, measuring equipment is not acceptable and needs improvement or change. In this analysis, the NDC value is 10. It means that data can only be divided into two distinct categories. Since the value is greater than 5 it indicates the resolution is high it indicates that it can detect small unit of variations. Precision in a measurement system relates to its reliability and consistency. The percentage of Total Variation consumed by the system indicates its impact on overall measurement variability. Lower percentages indicate greater precision and reliability. Using Minitab to perform the Gauge R&R ANOVA analysis; we found that Total Gauge R&R is 13.59% and Total variation is 100% for the lab performed, i.e., the measurement system variation is minor than total variation. According to variance components the Total Gauge R&R is less than 9%, and therefore we can say that the instrument used here exhibit precision and is acceptable. 7
Based on your GRR results and experiment, write down any recommendations to improve the adequacy of the measurement system. From the GRR results and experiment we found that the measurement variations can vary. Gage error can result in higher variations and inadequate measurement system. Having a properly calibrated gage is a need for a good measurement system. The part specification is another reason for measurement variation. If the specification of the part differs then the measured data can vary. Environmental factors can also affect the measurement system. The gage, part specifications and readings can vary depending on the environmental conditions. Therefore, the measurement should be done in adequate environmental conditions. 8
Conclusion; summary of all the results and overview of the adequacy measurement system The GRR analysis was conducted to assess the accuracy and repeatability of the digital vernier calliper. The total gage R&R was found to be 13.59 % and the total variation was 100%. The study variance, calculated as the ratio of the total gage R&R to the total variation, was found to be 100%. According to the variance components the total Gage R&R value is less than 9%, indicating that the instrument used here exhibit precision and is acceptable. The Gage and Repeatability were found to be the highest contributor to the measurement system variation with a study variance of 0.731687. The number of distinct categories (NDC) was 10, which was more than 5 and indicates that the measuring equipment is sensitive enough to detect smallest unit of process variations. To improve the adequacy of the instrument used, the following recommendations were made such, If the specification of the part differs then the measured data can vary, measurement should be done in adequate environmental conditions. 9
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
References What exactly is the NDC in MSA? (2020, October 30). ENCONA. https://www.encona.org/post/__ndc Ramana PV, Naomi, T. H., Hessing, T., PV, R., & N. (2014, June 29). Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R) . Six Sigma Study Guide. https://sixsigmastudyguide.com/repeatability-and-reproducibility-rr/ Gage R&R | Gage Repeatability & Reproducibility | Quality-One . (2017, August 30). Quality-One | Quality and Reliability Consulting - Training - Facilitation. https://quality-one.com/grr/ 10