Assessing the Impact of Supplier Performance on Supply Chain Resilience at Apple Inc
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Capella University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
3022
Subject
Management
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
10
Uploaded by JusticeOxideWaterBuffalo498
Assessing the Impact of Supplier Performance on Supply Chain Resilience at Apple Inc
[Name of Writer]
[Name of University]
2
Table of Contents
Introduction
......................................................................................................................................
3
Problem Statement
...........................................................................................................................
3
Research Objectives
.........................................................................................................................
3
Research Questions
..........................................................................................................................
4
Literature review
..............................................................................................................................
4
Methodology
....................................................................................................................................
5
Research Design
..............................................................................................................................
5
Methods of data collection
...............................................................................................................
6
Research Limitation
.........................................................................................................................
6
Conclusion
.......................................................................................................................................
6
References
........................................................................................................................................
8
3
Introduction
This paper empirically tests the impact of supply chain disruption on firm performance
using a new quantitative measure of disruption impact adapted from the system resilience
literature in Apple Inc. This new measure reflects the total amount of losses companies have
incurred and supports comparisons of the relative performance of bankrupt companies over time
(
Choudhary, 2021). To illustrate the value of this approach, Apple Inc also analyzed the
operational performance and market responses of more than 300 companies that experienced
supply chain disruptions between 2005 and 2014. After validating the results against the behavior
shown in the previous analysis, this new impact measure was specifically designed to
demonstrate that different company sizes and industries experience different levels of loss, not
just in the short term, after an infringement has been reported, but also in the longer term after a
disruption. This proposal will follow the research processing that deals with firm performance
management with respect to supply chain.
Problem Statement
Temporary closure of factories in Apple Inc pertained as the issue in supply chain of
mobile phones due to labor shortages results in 85% of global supply chain disruptions. These
disruptions make SC resilience (SCRES) an important strategy for sustainable development
(Ivanov, 2021). Before the appearance of this disease, many researchers were aware of SCRES
and conducted in-depth studies on it from different angles of Apple Inc (
Kamalahmadi, and
Mellat-Parast, 2016).
An analysis of the existing literature shows that there are significant
differences in the factor structures necessary to ensure innovation capabilities. SC
(re)engineering, collaboration, empowerment, risk awareness and knowledge management are
creative elements of SCRES. Additionally, features such as flexibility, speed, visibility and
interoperability can be considered priorities rather than creative factors for SCRES.
Research Objectives
To measure evident for overcoming traditional risk management force for supply chain
disruptions
To drive globalisation effects for reducing supply chain resilience in Apple Inc
To persuade competitive business in supply chain management for Apple Inc
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
To produce cross docking operations that lead for cost effective supply chain in Apple Inc
Research Questions
The research questions are defined as follows:
Are supply chain disrupt operational management in Apple Inc?
Is supply chain management expose resilience in business operations?
Is flow of goods disrupt in supply chain management’s performance in Apple Inc?
Literature review
The impact is to make SC resilience strategies (SCRES) important for sustainable development
(
Parast, and Shekarian, 2018). Before the emergence of supply chain mismanagement in Apple
Inc, many researchers were aware of SCRES and conducted extensive research on SCRES from
different perspectives. An analysis of the existing literature shows that there are large differences
between the criteria needed to ensure innovation (
Shishodia, 2023). SC (re)engineering,
collaboration, empowerment, risk awareness and knowledge management are natural products of
SCRES. Furthermore, aspects such as flexibility, speed, visibility and interactivity are considered
more important than creating SCRES. Most of them agreed that the SCRES training is necessary
to recover from the negative effects of the intervention. One way to deal with product risks is to
increase trust in the supply chain, which means that supply chain capabilities must be strong for
managing Apple Inc. In the long run, perhaps the key to keeping the supply chain competitive is
to be strong (
Hosseini, 2019). A good electronic device must be able to withstand the adverse
effects of unexpected events and quickly return to its original state before the risk occurs, or
transition to an optimal state after the risk is affected. Business operations are the best in Apple
Inc. The objective of risk management is to maximize and minimize the probability of risk
occurrence. In today's competitive and competitive business of Apple Inc’s environment,
customer needs and interests are constantly changing, and therefore the risk of product disruption
is increasing. To succeed in this situation, a company's supply chain must be strong. Most
companies know that performance metrics must exist with the specific end goal of improving the
quality of electronic products. The purpose of this paper is to discuss supply chain resilience and
identify indicators that can help improve performance and strengthen supply chains. These
published publications have been collected and classified to highlight some important
information. After classification and analysis of collected data, seven indicators of supply chain
5
resilience were found (
Ji, 2023). The Supply Chain Resilience Framework is designed to use
these indicators to help supply chain managers analyze and prevent disruptions. In recent years,
there has been a visible increase in risk worldwide, and it is necessary to measure the manager's
assessment to continue the intervention process of increased chain risk. The exchanges receive
attention in business and academic media. It seems clear that risky products can have negative
economic consequences. Resilience therefore helps to recover from disasters rather than
preventing them from occurring.
Methodology
The research is based on quantitative analysis and method of data collection relies on
primary method. The data has been collected through survey method of taking interviews of
manufacturers that defined the mode of supply chain resilience in Apple Inc. The components
has been driven by managing supply chain process that highlighted through industrial cluster. In
the SC context, companies are better qualified than academics. During the pilot phase, email
invitations with a link to a web-based interviews were sent to accredited business school media
groups to solicit potential respondent requests (
Sharma, and Joshi, 2023). After two weeks, 30
manufacturers signed up, but four of them gave up because their company went bankrupt.
Similar email invitations were sent to 1,300 companies during the pilot phase. A total of 604
publicly traded companies and 520 OTC (over-the-counter) companies received the email, while
the other companies' email systems did not accept unsolicited invitations. The total sample
available for analysis is therefore 1,125 companies.
Research Design
A research plan is an important part of the research process. This research methodology
will provide a comprehensive approach and research methods used to conduct the research. This
procedure serves to clarify the research process. There are three research methods: qualitative
research, qualitative research and mixed research. Researchers should determine research
methods based on the context of the specific problem and research needs (
Ivanov, and Dolgui,
2020). Qualitative research is based on the quality of the research conducted through detailed
data analysis. This research is based on quantitative analysis of teaching materials. A large
amount of research has been conducted to obtain survey data for the development of new
methods of data collection and analysis. The study was adapted using quantitative analysis and
6
non-mathematical data characterization. The researchers used the quantitative data analysis
method, which is the actual data analysis based on factual, statistical and quantitative analysis.
Applied research relies on quantitative scientific research methods to obtain quantitative results.
Methods of data collection
It is required to evaluate SCR metrics, we collected data from various published research
papers. The research methods of this study. The first search yielded 130 articles, which were
further screened to identify relevant material. After excluding irrelevant articles, a total of 55
articles were selected for further analysis (
Dolgui, and Ivanov, 2021). The collection spans from
2000 to 2018. It is based on the textual results of SCR, consider this study to be the basis of this
book and believe that the author started to analyze the chain strength after 2003. After two
weeks, 30 manufacturers signed up, but four of them gave up because their company went
bankrupt.
Research Limitation
The limitations of the study are based on a critical analysis of the data collection process
to obtain a detailed analysis. This study was prepared to implement global warming safeguards
policies and procedures. This study supports various information management methods such as
QR codes and explains research results in detail and well, thus helping in data collection for
various research sciences. In the future, the data collection process can continue if it is guided by
in-depth research and data collection analysis (
Waters, D., 2019). Due to time constraints, the
researcher completed the study within a given time limit, which reflects the ethics of the study.
However, it took several articles to get the researchers' approval. At the same time, information
will be collected to share their ideas and goals in scientific research by collecting information
from various key employees of Apple Inc.
Conclusion
Supply chain visibility is defined as the ability to monitor and identify areas of end-to-
end disruption in the supply chain. Visibility is a disruption that allows managers to quickly
respond to proposed options through continuous measurement. The specification of the tracking
model is important to improve system performance. The system provides warnings and offers
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
administrators an excellent opportunity to contain harmful situations. It also provides insight into
the impact of working capital positions using key monitoring and reporting messages. The
management has initiated that supply chain resilience has imposed an important part for the
tracing model of Apple Inc. One way to deal with product risks is to increase trust in the supply
chain, which means that supply chain capabilities must be strong for managing Apple Inc. In the
long run, perhaps the key to keeping the supply chain competitive is to be strong. A good
electronic device must be able to withstand the adverse effects of unexpected events and quickly
return to its original state.
8
References
Choudhary, N.A., Ramkumar, M., Schoenherr, T. and Rana, N.P., 2021. Assessing supply chain
resilience during the pandemic using network analysis.
IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management
.
Dolgui, A. and Ivanov, D., 2021. Ripple effect and supply chain disruption management: new
trends and research directions.
International Journal of Production Research
,
59
(1),
pp.102-109.
Hosseini, S., Morshedlou, N., Ivanov, D., Sarder, M.D., Barker, K. and Al Khaled, A., 2019.
Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption
risks.
International Journal of Production Economics
,
213
, pp.124-137.
Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A., 2020. Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply
chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19
outbreak.
International journal of production research
,
58
(10), pp.2904-2915.
Ji, L., Yuan, C., Feng, T. and Wang, C., 2020. Achieving the environmental profits of green
supplier integration: The roles of supply chain resilience and knowledge
combination.
Sustainable Development
,
28
(4), pp.978-989.
Kamalahmadi, M. and Mellat-Parast, M., 2016. Developing a resilient supply chain through
supplier flexibility and reliability assessment.
International Journal of Production
Research
,
54
(1), pp.302-321.
Parast, M.M. and Shekarian, M., 2018. The impact of supply chain disruptions on organizational
performance: a literature review.
Revisiting supply chain risk
, pp.367-389.
Sharma, M. and Joshi, S., 2023. Digital supplier selection reinforcing supply chain quality
management systems to enhance firm's performance.
The TQM Journal
,
35
(1), pp.102-
130.
Shishodia, A., Sharma, R., Rajesh, R. and Munim, Z.H., 2023. Supply chain resilience: A review,
conceptual framework and future research.
The International Journal of Logistics
Management
,
34
(4), pp.879-908.
9
Waters, D., 2019.
Supply chain risk management: vulnerability and resilience in logistics
. Kogan
Page Publishers.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
10
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Recommended textbooks for you
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning