3
Discussion Week 7
decision hinges on several key factors. Firstly, Project C's higher weighted score implies a
closer alignment with the organization's strategic goals, as it better fulfills the predefined
criteria. Secondly, the weighted scoring model ensures a comprehensive evaluation by
encompassing various critical aspects, such as financial feasibility, market potential, resource
requirements, and risk considerations. Ultimately, Project C is chosen to maximize value,
mitigate risks, and attain stakeholder buy-in. It signifies a strategically sound choice
influenced by a methodical and transparent evaluation process (Gido & Clements, 2014).
Selecting Project C, the project with the highest weighted score is rooted in its strong
alignment with the organization's strategic objectives, as demonstrated by its superior score.
The evaluation process embraces multiple dimensions, encompassing financial viability,
market potential, resource needs, and risk factors, ensuring a holistic assessment. By opting
for the project with the highest score, the aim is to deliver the most significant value to the
organization, whether in terms of revenue, cost savings, or strategic benefits. Moreover, this
approach implicitly factors in risk, favoring a choice that leans toward lower risk. The
structured and transparent evaluation process also fosters stakeholder buy-in, an essential
ingredient for a successful project (
Kerzner,
2017).
In conclusion, the selection of Project C reflects a strategic and thorough decision-
making process. It leverages a weighted scoring model, which considers multiple criteria,
aligns closely with the organization's goals, and prioritizes value maximization while
addressing risk. This choice, influenced by the relative importance of each criterion, is
expected to contribute significantly to the organization's overall success (Singh & Williams,
2021).