Debate on Vaccine Mandates: Ethical and Personal Freedom Issues

1 Outline Students Name Institutional Affiliation Course Number and Name Instructors Name Assignment Due Date

2 Should the government issue vaccine mandates? Lauren Gentempo  Con Team Position Statement: Lauren will introduce the Con team to the debate. She will lay out the primary arguments against vaccination laws imposed by the government. She will also stress the importance of personal autonomy, freedom of choice, and ethical issues.  Pro Team Questions Con Team: She will also respond to the Pro team's questions. She will address why the con team believes vaccine mandates infringe upon personal liberties and civil rights.  Con Team Questions Pro Team: In addition, she will challenge the arguments made by the Pro side and probe them to see why they support vaccine mandates.  Closing Statement: Lauren will summarize the Con team's main points. She will again stress how crucial it is to respect people's autonomy and ethical considerations. Farina Choudhury  Con Team Rebuttal: After Lauren finishes her introduction, Farina will offer a strong refutation of the points made by the Pro team. She will underline the potential risks, such as medical side effects and the possibility of discrimination.  Pro Team Questions Con Team: In her responses to the Pro team's questions, Farina will uphold the Con team's position and address any issues brought up by the Pro team.  Con Team Questions Pro Team: Farina will ask probing questions of the Pro team, challenging their stance on vaccine mandates.

3  Closing Statement: Farina will summarize the teams' concerns about medical side effects and discrimination. Freshia Wanjiku:  Con Team Position Statement: Freshia will further represent the Con team's position. She will highlight the importance of maintaining vaccine choice to avoid potential medical complications and conflicts with religious or personal beliefs.  Pro Team Questions Con Team: Freshia will expound on the Con team's stance regarding vaccine choice and its potential impact on religious freedom in response to the questions put forth by the Pro team.  Con Team Questions Pro Team: She will pose questions to the Pro team questions to challenge their stance on vaccine mandates.  Con Team Closing Statements: Freshia concisely summarizes the Con team's position on vaccine choice and religious freedom. Vincent Pham:  Con Team Position Statement: Vincent will offer a different perspective from the Con team, focusing on the possible logistical issues with implementing vaccination laws and potential invasions of privacy.  Pro Team Questions Con Team: He will also answer the Pro team's questions. He will elaborate on how enforcing vaccine mandates may pose logistical challenges and infringe privacy.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4  Con Team Questions Pro Team: Vincent will pose questions to the Pro team to challenge their stance on vaccine mandates.  Con Team Closing Statements: Vincent will conclude the Con team's arguments, summarizing the logistical and privacy concerns associated with vaccine mandates. Rachel Mathews:  Con Team Rebuttal: With an emphasis on preserving individual liberty, addressing potential ethical dilemmas, and outlining possible alternatives to mandates, Rachel will offer a final refutation of the arguments made by the Pro team.  Pro Team Questions Con Team: In response to the Pro team's questions, Rachel will discuss other possible solutions and support the Con team's position more.  Con Team Questions Pro Team: Rachel will ask the Pro team questions to challenge their position.  Closing Statement: In her final remarks, Rachel will summarize the primary concerns of the Con team on individual freedoms and ethical considerations, as well as provide alternatives for mandates.

fff.editedd.edited

Related Documents