Balancing Incremental and Radical Innovation

docx

School

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

499

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by GeneralUniverseOwl24

1 Balancing Incremental and Radical Innovation Student Name Tutors Name Institutional Affiliations Course Date

2 Balancing Incremental and Radical Innovation The importance of corporate innovation in recent years cannot be emphasized. Product quality, cheaper costs, and more profitability can only be achieved if a company understands all the numerous types of innovations that exist, from incremental to radical. The cooperative's innovative qualities, together with the strong economic development, enable them to compete in today's society. Innovation may be used for product creation, industrial processes, organizational structure, and the creativity of team members, among other things. There are two types of innovation: incremental innovation and radical innovation, depending on the level of technical change. This article analyses how firms can balance incremental and radical innovation effectively. From incremental to radical, new goods may be developed over a broad range. For example, a new flavor of coffee or a new model of the automobile are examples of incremental innovation, whereas radical innovation often introduces new features such as the Nespresso machine or the Toyota Prius to the market. Traditional businesses thrive at incremental innovation, but new businesses are more likely to bring in radical innovation. Improving a firm's present services' competitiveness through either radical, incremental, or a balance of both will assist the firm in adapting to an ever-changing business environment. There are several ways firms can implement this, including expanding the product's features and maybe lowering its pricing. Incremental innovation is a popular choice among organizations since it includes reduced risks and uncertainty. Kang & Hwang (2019) explains that many times, incremental innovation is the best strategy. According to Kang & Hwang (2019), one such great example of incremental innovation success is Gmail. Gmail is an incremental innovation of Google company, and it has become the most popular email service for a reason. A few features were available when Gmail was initially published by Google ( Sund et al.,2021). Emails were quickly sent, and

3 there were no ads to distract from the content. It seemed inevitable that Google would add additional capabilities to Gmail as the service grew in popularity. Like Chrome and Google Maps, several other Google products follow similar concepts. Because of its focus on bringing basic products to market first, the tech giant is always looking for ways to improve them. Successful results have been achieved by using this method of incremental innovation. However, Sund et al. (2021) argue that digital companies should not just depend on incremental innovation to market their products. It's possible that it may end up being unsuccessful. For example, Kodak, the world's most popular photography firm's incremental strategy, ended up creating more flaws in its services ( Ferraris et al., 2020). Ferraris et al. (2020) explain that that's when Kodak went out of business due to tremendous changes in the photography industry that altered how people take and preserve pictures. Since then, Kodak has been largely obliterated. Instead of abandoning the photography business, Kodak might have stayed relevant by investing in new technology. Most established companies have too many responsibilities to focus only on making or breaking disruptive breakthroughs. Existing businesses must invest a large portion of their new product development efforts to progressively upgrade their current offerings. As Toyota and other Japanese companies have shown with their tireless pursuit of incremental innovation, this approach can potentially be a game-changer ( Cembrero & Sáenz, 2018). If radical ventures compete for corporate resources with incremental ones, the former will inevitably lose out in the usual new development process. Incremental products are more easily shown to have a market and to be technologically viable than radical innovations. The market risk that a business faces may be lessened by incremental innovation. It's not uncommon for new ideas to fall flat, particularly in a dynamic market. Long-term investments, such as the creation of new technologies or undertaking research and Design initiatives, are risky for many firms. Training and resources are still needed even though

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 proven methods may assist increase success rates. Managers are typically excessively worried about balancing risk and market share. However, small continual advancements may be made without putting the company's budget or long-term viability at risk with an incremental plan. According to Lennerts et al. (2021), it is more difficult to get people on board with radical innovation since the concepts, products, and services are so fresh that many people are hesitant or reluctant to accept them. As much as individuals want to change, they do not want to change themselves. The transition to new ideas is more gradual if a company devotes more resources to incremental innovation. Consumers are more receptive to new versions of known items. With this incremental innovation strategy, not only can they broaden their range of products and satisfy the preferences of their target market while also maintaining a steady flow of revenue, the firm can continue to innovate and grow. Incremental innovation provides firms with diversity in terms of market products and penetration. As such, firms can compete more in the market setting and the whole industry. The workplace has increased. Continuous competitiveness would be lost if the company only focused on ambitious, long-term improvements ( Hansen, 2021). This is where incremental innovation comes in handy. The present versions of a given item may still be profitable while newer, superior ones are being developed through iterating on existing concepts. Using the method of incremental innovation, businesses may keep their present clients and market share by releasing new features and updates on a regular basis. Hansen (2021) further explains that one of the advantages of Radical Innovation is it provides a firm with a shift in the industry and marketing setting. When it comes to radical innovation, most company management may think that they will have to come up with a whole new concept, blueprint, and prototype. As such, radical innovation offers a firm an extreme innovation that becomes a game-changer for the firm. As such, a firm may either succeed or fail at inventing a new product. Before launching a radical innovation, a company

5 owner must have a clearer view of the market and the audience in order to determine whether it will succeed. When it comes to radical innovation, an open mind and an open heart are necessary. In addition, a firm must be aware that radical innovation requires exploiting their subordinates and assets' capabilities. Radical innovation, on the other hand, requires a lot of imagination and ideation. Bouncken et al. (2020) explain that it is important that a firm ensures that its subordinates are aware of the situation and are able to express their thoughts and views. Companies must make a great leap to disrupt the market with disruptive or radical inventions, whereas incremental innovations fit right in with current market dynamics. Companies may now confidently present ideas for new features and enhancements to the current market, knowing that they will still be able to provide clients with a high degree of accessibility. It does not matter whether a given firm is a small or big industry player; the firm still needs to spend time learning about new technologies ( Luger et al., 2018). If the firm's management locates the appropriate technology even if it offers uncertainty to the business, it is important the adopt it cautiously since, in the end, it may be very useful. Although it may seem counterintuitive, radical innovation relies on incremental ingenuity in several areas. Innovations in technology are needed to create something completely different. Because of such, there is a great deal of danger involved in this form of production. Bouncken et al. (2020) explain that small businesses and start-ups are more eager to try out new ideas as compared to established firms because the decree of loss and recovery is slower and easier compared to established firms. With radical innovation becoming successful, a firm will no longer have to fight with other firms for market share. The firm's return on investment may astound they succeed in finding their specialized market. Uber is a good example since it carved unique out a niche by providing services that other taxi services are unable to provide ( Luger et al., 2018). Radical

6 innovation is more valuable than incremental innovation in most cases. Radical innovation is a protracted process with the possibility of failure. As a result of the uncertainty, firms must have a calm demeanor, and their model must be flexible. The model may be codified and evaluated commercially after the conflicts have been addressed or decreased. According to Mahmood & Mubarik (2020) , a portfolio strategy for radical innovation, however, is still required by senior management. Rather than pitting radical ventures against one another, it is preferable to have two separate pools of funding that may be used to fund both forms of innovation. Mahmood & Mubarik (2020) explains that the new product development strategy determines how a corporation balances incremental and radical innovation in its product line. In the long run, companies with risk-averse cultures produce more innovative products and services because they adhere to a philosophy of continual development and steady advancement. Risk-averse cultures prefer to focus on large, bold measures in order to achieve their goals. But even when they don't work, the results may be profound. This means that a firm must strike a balance between radical and incremental innovation. As such, Stefan et al. (2021) advise that firms should divide their internal resources into two groups to do this. In order to be successful, a firm's radical innovation activities should be in direct competition with other radical innovations, not with incremental innovation initiatives. This implies that if a firm wants to ensure the success of its novel idea, it must prioritize product development. The quantity of assistance a firm provides in product development will be in direct proportion to the outcomes they achieve. Stefan et al. (2021) argue that when it comes to taking risks, most digital firms are hesitant. In order to meet their business objectives, firms improve existing products and services rather than developing new ones.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

7 The radical concept fits new participants significantly better since they have no incumbent history, which may confine the scope of their original With Kickstarter enabling fresh and interesting innovators to launch into a big audience, radicals will continue to amaze the world with things we do not even realize we need yet. However, time is important with radical innovation. If timed perfectly, it may be the ideal match, but if a product comes out too early, then there are potential consumers who will simply not understand it, much alone desire it yet. Technology is sometimes undeveloped, causing sluggish commercial acceptance. Another concern is that to develop the technology to meet the promise of the product, a major investment must be undertaken. Radical innovation, as impetuous as it seems, is, in reality, the longer game to play in terms of return. Markets may be slow to expand when time frames and investigating a concept; this requires consideration carefully. Strategies firms can use to balance radical and incremental innovation to cope with industry settings There are many strategies that firms can employ in order to manage radical and incremental innovations within their company settings. This section will, however, discuss three of the most common methods that include: the 70-20-10 model, the application of the right technologies, and the Launch and learn vs. test and launch approach. Using the 70-20-10 model helps companies strike a balance between innovation and exploitation of opportunities without interfering with the existing business structure. Successful businesses must strike the correct mix between discovery and exploitation ( Johnson, 2020). Assume that incremental innovation obtains 70 percent of your organization's budget. As a result, a firm will be able to provide more value to its customers and assure their pleasure. Thus, a firm may be certain that the company is secure since incremental advancements do not alter their existing working products landscape but rather finds ways to improve the existing products and services. Ten percent of the remaining 30

8 percent should go into efforts aimed at incremental innovation, while the remaining 20 percent should go toward radical innovation-focused initiatives. Spreading a firm's risk across a wide range of projects can help it succeed. As such, Johnson ( 2020) acknowledges that short-term objectives will be met, as will long-term investments. The 70-20-20 rule is used for social media and content marketing strategies. In order to keep ahead of the competition, this guideline allows a firm to adapt rapidly to market trends and changes. As such, a firm's consumers will appreciate the enhanced level of service they are provided. In order to prioritize a firm's spending or output, top management in these firms may apply this strategy. This strategy may be utilized to identify the areas that need to be prioritized in a firm's spending or output. Because of this, firms will have the budget available for distribution to these areas. The second strategy is that firm needs to invest in the correct technology. In order to foster innovation, a firm needs the right tools. It is important to look at the firm's current technology to see whether it can meet the needs of its consumers. Using a local Search engine optimization platform may help a firm offer high-quality services to their customers. A firm's local Search engine optimization platform and digital marketing efforts may benefit from this technology. For example, a firm may use it to put their customers in more than 100 regional directories, specialized and national directories and combine it with their Google My Business listings to monitor how their target audience finds them and what actions they take after reading the listing ( Mahmood & Mubarik, 2020). In order to show a firm's client's real outcomes, firms may use this data to improve local Search engine optimization platforms and create white-label reports. The third approach is using the Launch and learns vs. test and launch strategy. Liao & Zhang (2020) explains that every marketer should only plan after undertaking market research. It is important to keep in mind, though, that this is just a simulation of what would

9 happen if the new product were to hit the market. No matter what kind of research is used; surveys, interviews, or conjoint analysis, it is a simulation of the marketplace. For new items, there are two ways to conduct a test. Prior to launching, the product and its marketing strategy must be thoroughly tested in the market, or "test and launch." What I term "launch and learn" is launching a new product and seeing how well it performs in the market before making changes. When dealing with incrementally new goods and services, market research or a test and launch plan is more suited. Liao & Zhang (2020) explains that customers are able to accurately evaluate the new product, as well as suggest changes since they are acquainted with comparable items. Customers must be educated about radical new items if they are to be accepted by the market. As a consequence, it is preferable to begin with, a minimally viable product and learn as you go. Conclusion When it comes to radical innovation, incremental innovation is usually recognized. One of the most important characteristics of radical innovation is its ability to disrupt the current market in a major and lasting way. Incremental innovation is a change or update to an existing business model, product, service, or process that has a substantial impact on its performance and functioning Innovativeness is a must for every digital marketing firm. To ensure that a firm's customers get the most out of their services and products, the firm may develop incremental innovation strategy to enhance and create products. On the other hand, finding the right balance between gradual and radical innovation is crucial. Radical and incremental innovation strategies must be considered while creating an organization's innovation framework. There cannot be a one-dimensional approach to inventing anything new.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

10 References Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., Kraus, S., & Ritala, P. (2020). Innovation alliances: balancing value creation dynamics, competitive intensity and market overlap. Journal of Business Research , 112 , 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.004 Cembrero, D., & Sáenz, J. (2018). Performance outcomes of interaction, balance, and alignment between exploration and exploitation in the technological innovation domain. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research , 15 (1), 14-33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304494638_Performance_outcomes_of_inte raction_balance_and_alignment_between_exploration_and_exploitation_in_the_techn ological_innovation_domain Ferraris, A., Bogers, M. L., & Bresciani, S. (2020). Subsidiary innovation performance: Balancing external knowledge sources and internal embeddedness. Journal of International Management , 26 (4), 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100794 Hansen, F. (2021). Reaching Product Portfolio Balance: Similarities and Differences Between Incremental and Radical New Product Portfolio Management (Doctoral dissertation). https://feb.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/28534/ Johnson, H. (2020). The moderating effects of dynamic capability on radical innovation and incremental innovation teams in the global pharmaceutical biotechnology industry. Journal of Innovation Management , 8 (1), 51-83. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.001_0006

11 Kang, S., & Hwang, J. (2019). An investigation into the performance of an ambidextrously balanced innovator and its relatedness to open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity , 5 (2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5020023 Lennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal , 38 (1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002 Liao, Z., & Zhang, M. (2020). The influence of responsible leadership on environmental innovation and environmental performance: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 27 (5), 2016-2027. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1942 Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: The contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science , 29 (3), 449-470. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1189 Mahmood, T., & Mubarik, M. S. (2020). Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 160 , 120248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120248 Stefan, I., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2021). Trajectories towards balancing value creation and capture: Resolution paths and tension loops in open innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management , 39 (2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.004

12 Sund, K. J., Bogers, M. L., & Sahramaa, M. (2021). Managing business model exploration in incumbent firms: A case study of innovation labs in European banks. Journal of Business Research , 128 , 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.059

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Balancing Incremental and Radical Innovation

Related Documents