W10 Case Study Set Up-4
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Brigham Young University, Idaho *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
211
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by BrigadierGalaxy8536
Case Study Set Up
Issue #1, and # 2
Maintaining safety while perusing profits from operations
The primary issue at the core of the Deepwater Horizon disaster was a series of decisions that had to be made in order to prioritize time and cost savings over safety and best practices in drilling operations. Some of the problems that corisponded with this were:
Well Casting Design - Choosing between the long string casing and liner/tieback options directly affected
the number of barriers against oil and gas leaks. The long string casing, while quicker to install, provided fewer barriers compared to the liner/tieback, which offered more protection.
Centralizers - The number and type of centralizers used during cementing impacted the risk of gas flow problems. Despite recommendations for more centralizers to ensure proper cementing, the decision was made to proceed with fewer, potentially compromising the integrity of the cement job.
Mud Circulation and Cement Bond Log - The decision to conduct a partial mud circulation and skip the cement bond log disregarded industry best practices and warnings about potential issues with the cementing process, such as channeling.rriers compared to the liner/tieback, which offered more protection.
Solution for problem #1 and #2:
Addressing the issues that led to the oil rig disaster involves an overhaul of safety protocols, decision-
making processes, and industry regulations. Here are some potential solutions:
Short Term: Emergency Response Plan:
Ensure there's a solid plan in place to respond quickly if something goes wrong, including how to stop leaks and protect the environment.
Temporary Halt
: Consider pausing operations if there's any uncertainty or risk until it's safe to continue.
Intensive Monitoring:
Increase the frequency of checks and inspections to catch any issues early.
Training:
Provide rapid training or reminders about safety procedures to all workers involved.
Immediate Improvements:
Implement quick fixes or changes in procedures that can enhance safety without halting operations.
These solutions aim to address immediate risks and vulnerabilities while setting the stage for more comprehensive, long-term changes.
Long Term: Technology Development:
Invest in advanced technology for well monitoring, blowout prevention, and safety systems that can detect issues before they escalate.
Regulation Enhancement:
Collaborate with regulatory bodies to establish stricter guidelines and regularly update industry standards to ensure better safety practices.
Training and Education:
Develop comprehensive training programs for all involved parties, emphasizing safety protocols, emergency response, and environmental protection.
Risk Assessment and Management:
Conduct thorough risk assessments at every stage of drilling, identifying potential issues and developing robust contingency plans.
Industry Collaboration:
Foster collaboration among industry stakeholders to share best practices, lessons learned, and innovations to enhance overall safety.
Transparency and Accountability:
Promote transparency in reporting incidents and near-misses, and hold companies accountable for negligence or non-compliance.
Implementing these long-term solutions can significantly reduce the likelihood of similar disasters in the future while ensuring the safety of both workers and the environment.
Risks:
Implementing:
Operational Disruption
: Introducing new safety protocols might disrupt ongoing operations, causing delays and potentially impacting production schedules.
Cost Overruns:
Immediate implementation of safety measures could lead to unexpected costs, affecting project budgets and financial outcomes.
Technical Challenges:
Integrating new technologies and equipment into existing infrastructure may pose
technical challenges and require additional training.
Public Perception:
A perception that immediate changes are reactive rather than proactive might impact public trust and investor confidence.
Managing these risks requires a balanced approach, phased implementation, effective communication about the necessity of changes, robust training programs, and collaboration among industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies. Balancing safety enhancement with operational efficiency is crucial to mitigate these risks effectively.
Not implementing: Accidents and Disasters:
Without stringent safety protocols, the risk of accidents, oil spills, blowouts, and other disasters increases, leading to environmental damage, loss of life, and property destruction.
Environmental Impact:
Failure to implement safety measures heightens the risk of ecological disasters, polluting water bodies, damaging ecosystems, and harming wildlife.
Health Hazards: Workers face increased risks of injury or health issues due to inadequate safety measures, including exposure to toxic chemicals, accidents, and long-term health complications.
Reputation and Public Trust:
Incidents resulting from a lack of safety measures can severely damage a company's reputation, leading to public distrust, legal liabilities, and financial losses.
Operational Disruption:
In the event of accidents, operational disruptions, facility shutdowns, and production halts can occur, impacting revenue streams and market competitiveness.
Issue #3:
Communication
Throughout the case study, there were instances where information about potential risks or warnings from different parties involved in the project BP's personnel, contractors, and engineers was not effectively communicated or acted upon. Decisions were made without full consideration of warnings or
recommendations, and critical information regarding the well's integrity, potential hazards, or past experiences with similar situations was not adequately shared or taken into account.
This lack of transparent communication and the failure to heed warnings might have significantly contributed to the decisions that led to the disaster. Improved communication channels and a culture that encourages open and transparent sharing of information might have mitigated some of the risks and allowed for more informed decision-making.
Solution:
Short Term: E
mergency Response Plan
: Develop and implement a robust emergency response plan that includes clear procedures for handling similar crises, ensuring rapid and effective responses to any emergent situations.
Immediate Safety Audits and Inspections:
Conduct immediate safety audits and inspections on existing rigs and ongoing projects to identify potential hazards and rectify any existing safety issues.
Improved Training and Awareness
: Conduct emergency training programs for all personnel involved in offshore drilling to ensure they are well-prepared to respond to unforeseen incidents.
Immediate Risk Mitigation:
Implement temporary measures to mitigate any identified immediate risks, such as reinforcing safety protocols, halting operations in high-risk areas, or upgrading equipment.
Transparency and Accountability:
Foster a transparent environment where reporting and accountability
are encouraged, ensuring that all incidents are reported, investigated, and learnings are disseminated promptly.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Long Term: Advanced Technology Implementation
: Invest in and deploy cutting-edge technology for drilling, monitoring, and control systems to enhance safety and response capabilities.
Enhanced Training Programs:
Develop and implement continuous training programs for all personnel involved in offshore drilling, focusing on safety protocols, risk management, and emergency response.
Independent Safety Reviews:
Conduct regular, independent safety reviews by third-party experts to evaluate operational safety, identify potential hazards, and recommend improvements.
Safety Culture Development:
Foster a safety-oriented culture within the organization that prioritizes safety over cost or schedule pressures, encouraging reporting of safety concerns without fear of reprisal.
Technology Testing and Validation:
Rigorously test and validate new technologies and materials to ensure their reliability and effectiveness in preventing accidents.
Public Accountability and Transparency
: Establish mechanisms for transparent reporting of safety measures, incidents, and remediation efforts to build trust with stakeholders and the public.
Continual Improvement
: Encourage a continuous improvement mindset, where lessons learned from incidents are analyzed and used to refine safety protocols and operational practices.
Risks:
Implementing:
Financial Costs:
Implementing advanced technology, rigorous training programs, and enhanced safety measures requires substantial financial investment, potentially impacting profitability for companies.
Regulatory Compliance:
Stricter regulations may impose additional administrative burdens, compliance costs, and constraints on operations, potentially affecting the speed and efficiency of projects.
Resistance to Change:
Instituting a safety-focused culture and implementing new protocols may face resistance from employees accustomed to existing practices, potentially causing delays or inefficiencies.
Operational Disruptions:
Upgrading safety measures or conducting independent safety reviews might disrupt ongoing operations, causing downtime and impacting productivity.
Public and Stakeholder Expectations:
Meeting public and stakeholder expectations for safety and environmental protection requires transparency and consistent performance, failure of which can damage reputation and trust.
Balancing Cost and Safety:
Striking the right balance between cost efficiency and safety measures can be challenging, especially when cost-cutting pressures conflict with safety requirements.
Resource Constraints
: Limited availability of specialized resources, skilled personnel, or technological infrastructure might hinder effective implementation.
Not implementing:
Recurring Accidents
: Failure to implement necessary safety measures increases the likelihood of similar accidents, potentially leading to loss of life, environmental disasters, and reputational damage for the company.
Regulatory Scrutiny:
Regulators might impose stricter regulations or penalties on companies that don’t demonstrate proactive efforts to enhance safety, leading to increased oversight and potentially substantial fines.
Public Trust:
Continued negligence in implementing safety improvements could erode public trust, resulting in boycotts, negative publicity, and long-term damage to the company’s brand.
Employee Morale and Retention:
Employees may lose confidence in the company’s commitment to their safety, leading to reduced morale and potential talent attrition, impacting productivity and innovation.
Environmental Impact
: Neglecting safety measures might result in severe environmental damage, further impacting ecosystems, wildlife, and communities in the vicinity of operations.
Operational Disruptions:
Ongoing safety issues might lead to operational disruptions, potential shutdowns, or project delays, affecting revenue streams and investor confidence.