Monday
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Laney College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
History
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by MegaMandrill2402
1.
Rome and Han China had thriving, tranquil, and rich empires that significantly influenced their respective
territories. Large-scale infrastructure projects, a centralized administration, and a powerful military characterized the Pax Romana and the Han eras. However, there were considerable contrasts between the two empires' methods for achieving this peace and wealth. For instance, Han China thrived mostly via peaceful diplomacy and trade, whereas Rome expanded through invasion and armed force. In addition, although the Han period witnessed several upheavals and changes in government, the Pax Romana was essentially a time of stability.
2.
Changes in trade networks and interactions with their peripheral social groups were the most crucial factors in the prosperity of both Rome and Han China. For instance, the Silk Road significantly facilitated both empires' trade and cultural interchange. The Romans also constructed a vast network of roads and aqueducts that aided in tying together their empire and fostering trade. Implementing the tribute system in Han China aided in preserving diplomatic ties with neighboring nations and enhanced the empire's power. However, production and distribution within the empires and changes in religious and political societies significantly contributed to their success. For instance, the spread of Buddhism in China
and the spread of Christianity in Rome both had a profound effect on culture and politics.
3.
In both Roman and Han civilizations, patriarchal rules and ideals placed restrictions on the position of women. The capacity to inherit property and do business was one of the few legal advantages that Roman women enjoyed over their counterparts in Han China. In contrast, women in Han China frequently kept to themselves in the home and were supposed to be submissive to their husbands, sons, and dads. In both empires, women were often denied access to formal education and political engagement. The experiences of minority groups in these empires were one thing that was missing from the story of the week. For instance, how were enslaved people, immigrants, and other oppressed groups
treated in these civilizations, and how did their struggles affect Roman and Han Chinese politics and society.
4.
a.
If I had to pick, I would like to live during Han China's heyday. This is due to the numerous cultural, artistic, and scientific advancements that took place during this time, such as the creation of the wheelbarrow, the development of papermaking, and the emergence of the arts and literature. Confucianism, which emphasized moral and ethical standards for personal conduct and community harmony, was also highly valued in Han China.
b.
My decision may differ depending on the individual situation if I lived outside the empire. For instance, I may choose to reside in the Pax Romana, renowned for its more liberal treatment of many cultures and religions, if I belonged to a minority group marginalized or repressed inside the empire.
5.
I enjoyed studying more about the Pax Romana and the imperial era of Han China this week since it was educational and thought-provoking. The significance of commerce and diplomacy in upholding stability and prosperity is one link I made to our current reality. Both Rome and Han China increased their influence through strategic trade networks and diplomatic ties. They fostered cultural interchange, which
aided in building a feeling of interconnection and collaboration within their territories. The week also emphasized the significance of cultural and intellectual accomplishments in forming these empires' legacy, which has continued to influence our current world.
I concur that both empires had a single, centralized emperor and concentrated power structure, but the two had different ways of making decisions. It is interesting to think about how women fit into both communities, and I agree that Han China enabled women to learn, whereas Rome gave them more property ownership. I also concur that the relationships with outlying social groups were crucial to the prosperity of both empires. Giving these communities more autonomy and access to just legal systems contributed to the stability of the empires. It is fascinating to observe how the emperors of each empire struck a balance between the necessity for central authority and the desire to grant some degree of independence to their citizens.
I agree that both empires were centralized governments with enduring stability, but their cultural and theological backgrounds differed. It's interesting to observe how each culture conducts diplomacy and trade differently, with the Romans taking a more aggressive approach and the Chinese relying more on trade. Your observations on women's roles in these civilizations are also thought-provoking, notably how their lives were influenced more by their religious beliefs, political situation, and economic position than by the rules designed to control them. I concur that religions, ideologies, and belief systems significantly influence people's lives, and an excellent illustration of this is the distinction between how women were treated under Daoism and Confucianism.
The article mentions 'collapse as recovery' what is this talking about? (Briefly in a couple sentences).
The idea that a society's collapse or disintegration might result in reorganization and eventually a time of
development and recovery is known as the "collapse as recovery" theory.
In general, what role did religion play in the reorganization of the Afro-Eurasian system in this period, according to the section?
The section claims that religion was crucial to the Afro-Eurasian system's restructuring at this time. It offered a common cultural and moral framework that aided in the development of new political and social institutions as well as the diffusion of novel concepts and innovations.
Are there any lessons we can learn from the collapse of empires that might help us think about how to
keep our own society from collapsing? If so, what are they? If not, why not?
The need to preserve infrastructure, tackle economic injustice, and avoid overextending military might are just a few lessons we may take away from the fall of empires.
Jared Diamond argues that societies collapse because of actions that people take and decisions we make. Do you remember any actions or policies made in the Roman or Han empires that led to their collapse?
Economic instability, political corruption, military overextension, and environmental degradation are some activities or policies that may have led to the fall of the Roman and Han empires.
This section's information indicates that state structures and belief systems were intertwined and held varied forms of responsibility for restructuring. For instance, a rearrangement of the Islamic state structure that prioritized religious and cultural integration resulted from the Abbasid dynasty's acceptance of Islam in the 8th century. On the other hand, a mix of internal and external factors, including social and economic issues connected to the state's structure and belief systems, led to the fall of the Roman and Han empires.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help