Angel__Hoffman_HIS_200__Applied_History 2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
200
Subject
History
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by ahoffman92
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this question in no more than one sentence, using proper grammar.
The three historical lenses that I could apply to gain a fuller picture between the relationship of these two would be political, cultural, and economical.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be
longer than one sentence.
When the whites found out how fertile the Natives land was for farming and the value of the gold in Georgia this is when conflicts began between the two. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.
The three historical lenses that I could use to look at the events described in the video are social, economical, and military lens.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 4 Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)
Massasoit’s decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on epidemic of diseases and the increasingly threatening behavior by the people of what is now known as Rhode Island today. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 5 Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
One short-term consequence was that the treaty of a mutual defense alliance again their common enemies did not last long and relationships began to fray shortly after they were made. One long-term consequence was that after the war in 1676 the Wampanoag barely seized to exist anymore. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about
your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.
My understanding of the women’s suffrage has drastically changed since the beginning of me
choosing the topic. My understanding of the women’s suffrage was that there was a group of women fighting for all rights for the women. However, the women’s suffrage is more about fighting for the right to vote for women. Most women did believe in equal rights between men and women, but the suffrage itself was for the right to vote, which women were excluded from before the ratification of the 19th amendment.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee
Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.
1. Economical. The Cherokee’s land was great for cotton production and cotton was a dominant cash crop in Georgia. 2. Military. In 1836 the Cherokees had 2 years to voluntarily move West before the U.S army
began a “forced removal”
3. Social. The Cherokees were removed from their lands and places in prison camps to live without access to medicines or traditional foods, diseases began to move through the camps. 4. Political. 1828, Andrew Jackson was elected, and he was the president who took away the civil rights of the Cherokee Indians.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.
I agree with the thesis statement.
1. In 1838, President Martin Van Buren ordered George Winfield Scott to begin forcibly removing the Cherokee.
2. John Ross denounced the treaty and the Cherokee National Council declared it a fraud. The
U.S senate ratified it in 1836.
3. Cherokee’s were to remain East of the Mississippi
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help