HSCI 4112 Week 3 Discussion Question 2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Nairobi *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1001
Subject
Health Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by MegaMule2426
HSCI 4112 Week 3 Discussion Question 2
In responding to the Smart and Connected Health (SCH) Program Request for Proposals
(RFP) from the National Science Foundation (NSF), it's crucial to adhere to the guidelines
outlined in the RFP and address the specific requirements and goals of the program.
Type of Project
Given the two classes of proposals outlined in the RFP, I would consider submitting an
Integrative Project (INT). This type of project involves multidisciplinary teams spanning 1 to 4
years. An Integrative Project aligns well with the complex nature of the Smart and Connected
Health initiative, which requires collaboration across various fields such as information science,
technology, behavior, cognition, sensors, robotics, bioimaging, and engineering.
Timeframe for Submission
The timeframe for submission would depend on the complexity and scope of the
proposed Integrative Project. Considering the multidisciplinary nature and potential scale of the
research, a 4-year project might be appropriate to allow for in-depth exploration, development,
and validation of innovative approaches.
Type of Grant
The type of grant to be awarded would be contingent on the proposed project. Since we
are considering an Integrative Project, it would likely fall into the category of large-scale grants
that support multi-disciplinary research over an extended period.
Information to Include in the Proposal
The proposal should be comprehensive and address the key components outlined in the
RFP. This includes, but is not limited to:
Project Title and Overview: Clearly articulate the purpose and objectives of the
proposed project.
Research Plan: Detail the research approach, methodology, and expected
outcomes. Clearly explain how the project aligns with the goals of the SCH
Program.
Multidisciplinary Team: Clearly define the roles and expertise of each team
member. Emphasize the collaborative nature of the project.
Timeline: Provide a detailed timeline of activities and milestones over the project
duration.
Budget: Present a detailed budget, justifying the allocation of funds for personnel,
equipment, travel, and other project-related expenses.
Broader Impact: Describe the potential broader impact of the project on
healthcare transformation, patient outcomes, and societal well-being.
Partnerships and Collaborations: Highlight any collaboration with industry, non-
profit organizations, or other relevant stakeholders.
Risk Assessment: Address potential risks and challenges associated with the
proposed research and outline strategies for mitigation.
Lessons Learned from the RFP
From reading the RFP, several key insights about the grant proposal process can be
gleaned:
1.
The emphasis on multidisciplinary teams underscores the importance of collaboration
across various fields to address the complexity of healthcare transformation effectively.
2.
Understanding how the proposed project aligns with national initiatives and
recommendations from organizations like PCAST, NRC, and IOM is crucial for
demonstrating its relevance and significance.
3.
The RFP emphasizes the need for high-risk, high-reward advances that contribute to the
disruptive transformation of health and healthcare, reinforcing the importance of
innovative ideas in proposals.
4.
The encouragement of collaboration between different agencies, such as NSF and NIH,
highlights the interconnected nature of research efforts and the need for joint funding to
address cross-cutting research challenges.
In summary, a successful response to this RFP requires a carefully crafted proposal that
aligns with the SCH Program's goals, emphasizes collaboration, and addresses the complexities
of healthcare transformation through innovative, multidisciplinary research.
References
National Institutes of Health. (2013).
Smart and Connected Health (SCH) (nsf13543) | NSF -
National Science Foundation
. National Science Foundation.
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13543/nsf13543.htm
Lang, T. A. (2009).
How to write, publish, and present in the Health Sciences: A guide for
physicians and laboratory researchers
. Philadelphia, PA: ACP.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help