Lab_2_210
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Simon Fraser University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
210
Subject
English
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
8
Uploaded by yubrdhdh
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
1/4
Lab 2: Engineering Measurement
Name:
Student number:_
Name:__
Student number Objectives
In this lab, you will collect and analyze some data with a random nature with the goal of familiarizing
yourself with the concept of variability. You will also need to graphically present the collected data and
propose a proper distribution function for it. In the last part of the lab, you will study error propagation
in experiments. 1. Data collection
You will be provided with 25 capacitors with a nominal value of 10nF. Using your digital multimeter,
measure the capacitance of each of these capacitors and record your observations in the table below
(denoted C
1
). Report 3 significant digits for your measurements (make sure that you are using the
multimeter correctly).
C
1
Capacitance (nF) C
1
Capacitance (nF) C
1
Capacitance (nF) C
1
Capacitance (nF) 1
8
15
22
2
9
16
23
3
10
17
24
4
11
18
25
5
12
19
6
13
20
7
14
21
What are the mean and standard deviation of the measured capacitances?
μ
C1
= _____________
σ
C1
= _____________
2. Graphical presentation
2.a. Histogram of the data
Draw the histogram for the frequency of the capacitance values. How do you choose the number of
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
2/4
bins?
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
3/4
2.b. Boxplot of the data
Draw the boxplot for the measured data and indicate meaningful indices: Q1, Q2 (median), Q3, IQR,
outliers (if applicable), etc
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
4/4
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
5/4
3. Rejection of data
Identify a data point in collected values for C
1
that you might consider suspicious. Use the Chauvenet`s
criterion to decide whether you should reject this point from your data or not (assume the data has a
normal distribution).
4. Fitting to a distribution
Using the “probplot” function in Matlab (attach Matlab plots to your report), find out which one of these
distributions describes the data better: normal, lognormal, weibull? Distribution of data:
_________weibull___________
How would you make a decision in this case if the plots for normal and lognormal distributions do not
produce a clear distinction?
Answer:
USE THE KOLMOGOROV – SMIRNOV TEST OR ANDERSON – DARLING TEST
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
6/4
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
7/4
5. Propagation of errors
Get ten 100nF capacitors (denoted C
2
) from the TAs and do the same measurements as in step 1 to find
the mean and standard deviation of the measured capacitances.
C
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
capacitance
μ
C2
= _____101.59________
σ
C2
= ________3.4565_____
Pair up the 100nF capacitors with another ten 10nF capacitors from your original batch. Using the
breadboard, place each pair in parallel
and record the equivalent capacitance (denotes Cp).
C
p
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
capacitance
What are the values of mean and standard deviation for the combination of the
MSE 210 Engineering Measurement and Data Analysis
8/4
capacitors?
μ
Cp
= ___110.22________
σ
Cp
= ___2.7174_________
How do these numbers compare with the theoretical values?
Hint: Report uncertainties in the normal distribution based on 95% significance
level (uncertainty,
δ=
2
σ)
For parallel connection of capacitors, C
p
= C
1
+ C
2
Explain your choice of error propagation approach.
Answer: The values closely align with the anticipated 110 uF expected value, with
each measurement falling within the 95% significance level. Employing a 2σ
uncertainty approach proves pragmatic, as it ensures a conservative estimation of
uncertainty. This method acknowledges the possibility of a greater actual
uncertainty than the standard deviation σ, particularly in situations where
measurements may be influenced by undisclosed or uncontrollable factors.