Project 2 Peer feedback

doc

School

Centennial College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

171

Subject

English

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

doc

Pages

Uploaded by KidFalconMaster770

Project 2 Academic Honesty and Peer Review Unit 10 (5%) Academic honesty questionnaire: Part one What advice would you give to a peer or friend who was tempted to use AI and/or other services/tools to write their assignment for them? If a friend or peer is considering resorting to AI or other tools to complete their assignment, I would strongly advise against it. Using such shortcuts not only undermines the educational process but also poses significant risks, particularly regarding plagiarism. Assignments serve as opportunities for learning and skill development, and by relying on AI, they're essentially bypassing this crucial aspect. Moreover, even if the content generated by AI is modified, there's still a considerable risk of unintentional plagiarism, which can have severe consequences. It's important to emphasize the value of academic integrity and the long-term implications of unethical behavior. Instead, I would encourage them to seek guidance from instructors, tutors, or academic support services if they're struggling with the assignment. By tackling the task with integrity and perseverance, they'll not only learn valuable skills but also uphold the principles of honesty and fairness that are integral to the academic community. Part two Go to your content folder -  College policies Centennial College’s Academic Honesty and Plagiarism policy. Summarize section 7 in 100 words. Focus on 3 points as there are many. In Section 7, consequences for students engaging in academic dishonesty are outlined, ranging from milder to more severe penalties. Less severe penalties include failing the course for the semester and receiving a formal warning or reprimand. A more serious repercussion involves a permanent downgrade on the transcript, even if the assessment is retaken. Additionally, the transcript may include a notation denoting the occurrence of academic dishonesty. Students may face one, two, or all of these penalties, depending on the severity of the offense.

Part three Post feedback to two of your classmates on the discussion board. Then copy and paste that feedback on this template and submit it in the assignment folder titled “Peer Review.” To be evaluated, your reviews must be in both the discussion board and this document. Your response must be a minimum of 350 words (one paragraph). Reminders: Use Courteous, Specific, and Positive Language Start with mentioning the strengths of the essay. Suggest 3-6 goal-oriented tasks for the writer. Ie.,) change your thesis to include the frameworks you will be using. Include citations to your quotes. Draft 1 Peer’s Name: Wing Yee Wendy Wong Your Feedback: Article “The Meaning of Cousins: Is it a Unique Role that can’t be Replaced?” presents a thoughtful exploration of the article's key themes and implications. The article's sincerity, underscored by the inclusion of personal narratives, effectively engages readers by evoking empathy and resonance with real-life experiences. By incorporating Noelene Lan castle’s perspective on the impact of family dynamics on childhood companionship, they provide a relatable example that enriches the discussion and underscores the emotional stakes involved in the evolving family structure. Furthermore, recognition of the importance of chosen families, particularly for disadvantaged minorities, adds depth to the analysis by highlighting broader social issues and emphasizing the value of alternative support networks in contemporary society. Additionally, by referencing expert opinions and quoting from other relevant articles, bolster the argument and provide a well-rounded perspective on the topic. However, to further strengthen your critique, you could delve deeper into the potential implications of diminishing cousin relationships on individuals and society as a whole. Exploring the long-term effects of these trends on social cohesion, intergenerational

dynamics, and community support systems could offer valuable insights into the broader impact of changing family structures. Moreover, while you effectively highlight the significance of chosen families as alternative support networks, you could benefit from discussing potential limitations or challenges associated with relying solely on chosen families, such as issues of accessibility, inclusivity, and dependency. By addressing these aspects, you could provide a more nuanced analysis of the complexities surrounding family relationships in contemporary times. In conclusion, your analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the key themes and arguments presented in Stechnyson article. Your incorporation of personal narratives, discussion of social issues, and engagement with relevant sources demonstrate a strong understanding of the topic. With further exploration of the broader implications and potential limitations of your arguments, your critique could become even more insightful and impactful. Overall, your analysis offers valuable insights into the evolving nature of family relationships and your significance in shaping individual experiences and societal dynamics. Draft 2 Peer’s Name: Kiranpreet Your Feedback: Your essay delves deeply into the themes and arguments presented in India Bourke's article "A leading data scientist's journey from doomism to climate hope." You effectively highlight the importance of evidence-based optimism in confronting climate doomism, as exemplified by Hannah Ritchie's transformation from pessimism to optimism through data-driven insights. By incorporating quotes and referencing additional sources such as McGrath (2022) and Popovich & Plumer (2021), the essay enriches the discussion and provides a multifaceted perspective on the topic. The critique adeptly identifies areas of strength in Bourke's argument, particularly in emphasizing the significance of data-driven narratives in shaping environmental policy and public discourse. However, to further deepen the analysis, you could explore the potential limitations or challenges associated with relying solely on data-driven optimism. You could also delve into the broader societal implications of Bourke's argument and suggest potential strategies

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

for leveraging data-driven narratives to inspire actionable solutions to climate change. Furthermore, expanding on the discussion of McGrath's (2022) call for taxing fossil fuel profits and Popovich & Plumer's (2021) examination of historical responsibility for climate change could provide additional context and nuance to the critique. By incorporating these elements, the essay could offer a more comprehensive and nuanced analysis of Bourke's article, contributing to a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding climate optimism and environmental challenges. Additionally, you could consider further exploring the implications of Bourke's argument on global policy and public perception, as well as potential avenues for fostering collaboration and collective action among stakeholders. By expanding the scope of their analysis and delving into these aspects in greater detail, the essay could provide a more comprehensive examination of the topic, offering valuable insights and perspectives for further consideration. Overall, your essay demonstrates a thoughtful engagement with the subject matter and provides a solid foundation for further exploration and discussion of these important issues. Please consult your instructor if more than two peer reviews are required .

Project 2 Peer feedback

Related Documents