Essay_Two
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Bahauddin Zakaria University, Multan *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1403
Subject
English
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
Pages
13
Uploaded by CoachFrog3727
Shawnee Mission East High School
Quick Submit
Quick Submit
Essay Two.docx
Salman Malik Salman Malik
Document Details
Submission ID
trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Submission Date
Nov 29, 2023, 1:04 PM CST
Download Date
Nov 29, 2023, 1:06 PM CST
File Name
Essay_Two.docx
File Size
24.8 KB
11 Pages
2,146 Words
14,608 Characters
Page 1 of 13 - Cover Page
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 1 of 13 - Cover Page
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
How much of this submission has been generated by AI?
*6%
of qualifying text in this submission has been determined to be
generated by AI.
* Low scores have a higher likelihood of false positives.
Caution: Percentage may not indicate academic misconduct. Review required.
It is essential to understand the limitations of AI detection before making decisions about a student's work. We encourage you to learn more about Turnitin's AI detection capabilities before using the tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the percentage mean?
The percentage shown in the AI writing detection indicator and in the AI writing report is the amount of qualifying text within the submission that Turnitin's AI writing detection model determines was generated by AI.
Our testing has found that there is a higher incidence of false positives when the percentage is less than 20. In order to reduce the likelihood of misinterpretation, the AI indicator will display an asterisk for percentages less than 20 to call attention to the fact that the score is less reliable.
However, the final decision on whether any misconduct has occurred rests with the reviewer/instructor. They should use the percentage as a means to start a formative conversation with their student and/or use it to examine the submitted assignment in greater detail according to their school's policies.
How does Turnitin's indicator address false positives?
Our model only processes qualifying text in the form of long-form writing. Long-form writing means individual sentences contained in paragraphs that make up a longer piece of written work, such as an essay, a dissertation, or an article, etc. Qualifying text that has been determined to be AI-generated will be highlighted blue on the submission text.
Non-qualifying text, such as bullet points, annotated bibliographies, etc., will not be processed and can create disparity between the submission highlights and the percentage shown.
What does 'qualifying text' mean?
Sometimes false positives (incorrectly flagging human-written text as AI-generated), can include lists without a lot of structural variation, text that literally repeats itself, or text that has been paraphrased without developing new ideas. If our indicator shows a higher amount of AI writing in such text, we advise you to take that into consideration when looking at the percentage indicated.
In a longer document with a mix of authentic writing and AI generated text, it can be difficult to exactly determine where the AI writing begins and original writing ends, but our model should give you a reliable guide to start conversations with the submitting student.
Disclaimer
Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify both human and AI-generated text) so it should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an organization's application of its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred.
Page 2 of 13 - AI Writing Overview
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 2 of 13 - AI Writing Overview
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
1
Title of the Essay: Future Trends, Issues & Problems
Topic: Critically Assess the Main Costs and Benefits Associated with A Shift Towards a Circular Economy
Student Name:
Student ID:
Date of Submission: Page 3 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 3 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
2
Topic: Critically Assess the Main Costs and Benefits Associated with A Shift Towards a Circular Economy
Introduction
Transitioning from a linear to a circular economy represents a model shift in the approach to resource utilization, production, and consumption. Unlike the linear model, which follows a take, make and dispose pattern, a circular economy seeks to keep resources in use for as long as possible, extracting their maximum value while minimizing waste, pollution, and environmental degradation (Weetman, 2021). This transformative economic model prioritizes regenerative systems and design by intending to separate economic growth from resource depletion (Weetman, 2021). The significance of implementing a circular economy lies in its capacity to address important environmental challenges. With the planet facing issues of resource scarcity, climate change, and environmental degradation, the circular economy offers a promising framework to alleviate these problems (Weetman, 2021). Circular Economy seeks to reduce the strain on natural resources, reduce pollution, and minimize the carbon footprint associated with production and consumption by reimagining the way materials (Weetman, 2021). This essay discusses the critical assessment of the costs and benefits involved in transitioning towards a circular economy. It will explain the complicated aspects of this transition, exploring the economic, social, and environmental dimensions. In the last, the essay seeks to explain the complexities characteristic in this transformative economic approach, eventually highlighting the opportunities and obstacles in achieving a more sustainable and resilient economic system (Weetman, 2021).
Page 4 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 4 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
3
Main Body
Economic Costs
Transitioning toward a circular economy involves substantial economic costs, necessitating initial investments in transforming industries, technology, and infrastructure. Buchholz & Rübbelke (2019) highlight the need for significant financial expenditures to reconfigure production processes, adopt sustainable technologies, and repair existing infrastructure (Buchholz and Rübbelke, 2019). Such investments are important to facilitate the shift from linear production methods to circular ones by focusing on resource efficiency, recycling, and reusing materials (Buchholz and Rübbelke, 2019). Ghosh and Ghosh (2021) further emphasize the financial commitments required to innovate and integrate circular practices within industries, spanning sectors from manufacturing to services (Ghosh and Ghosh, 2021).
These initial investments can have significant implications for traditional economic models and industries. The shift toward a circular economy challenges established business models centered around continuous growth and consumption (Ghosh and Ghosh, 2021). Buchholz & Rübbelke (2019) highlight potential disruptions and adjustments needed within industries accustomed to a linear take-make-dispose model (Buchholz and Rübbelke, 2019) The circular economy's emphasis on longevity, reuse, and recycling could necessitate fundamental changes in production processes and consumer behavior, potentially impacting established markets and economic structures (Buchholz and Rübbelke, 2019).
Barriers and Challenges
Barriers and challenges to implementing circularity model are outlined by Kirchherr et al. (2018) and Korhonen et al. (2018). Regulatory obstacles including inadequate policies and standards supporting circular practices, pose substantial hurdles. Institutional barriers, such as the lack of Page 5 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 5 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
4
collaboration among stakeholders or insufficient support from governmental bodies, impede the smooth transition toward circularity (Kirchherr et al., 2018). Furthermore, behavioral challenges, encompassing consumer habits and resistance to change, present considerable obstacles in embracing circular models (Kirchherr et al., 2018). Implementing circularity across various sectors faces limitations and challenges unique to each industry. Kirchherr et al. (2018) note sector-specific difficulties, such as complex supply chains, technological constraints, or the difficulty in integrating circular principles into existing business practices (Kirchherr et al., 2018). Korhonen, Honkasalo and Seppälä (2018) highlight the challenge of breaking away from the "status quo" and prevailing economic models that prioritize linear consumption and production methods (Korhonen, Honkasalo and Seppälä, 2018). Social Implications
The shift toward a circular economy carries significant social implications, highlighted by Maria & Vázquez-Brust (2023) and Martins (2018). One aspect involves potential job displacement and the need for retraining due to changes in industries. As circular practices prioritize resource efficiency and recycling, some traditional jobs reliant on linear production may become obsolete, necessitating workforce transitions and upskilling initiatives to align with the demands of circular industries (Martins, 2018). This transition period may pose challenges for individuals and communities reliant on specific sectors undergoing transformation (Martins, 2018).
Equity issues also surface in the adoption of circular practices. Maria & Vázquez-Brust (2023) emphasize the importance of addressing socio-economic disparities to ensure an inclusive transition (Maria and Vázquez-Brust, 2023). Certain communities or demographic groups may bear a disproportionate burden or lack access to opportunities arising from the circular economy, potentially exacerbating existing inequalities (Maria and Vázquez-Brust, 2023). Moreover, social Page 6 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 6 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
5
acceptance of new practices is crucial. Martins (2018) notes the need for fostering awareness and acceptance among the general populace to embrace circularity, as behavioral changes and new consumption patterns may face resistance or skepticism, impacting the successful integration of circular practices into society (Martins, 2018).
Environmental Benefits
The shift towards a circular economy yields significant environmental benefits, elucidated by Figge et al. (2023) and Lacy et al. (2020). Central to this transition is the notable reduction in resource depletion, waste generation, and pollution (Figge, Thorpe and Gutberlet, 2023). By emphasizing resource efficiency, recycling, and reusing materials, a circular economy mitigates the overexploitation of finite resources, limits the generation of waste, and minimizes pollutants emitted throughout the lifecycle of products (Figge, Thorpe and Gutberlet, 2023). Moreover, embracing circular practices positively impacts biodiversity and ecosystems.
del Río et al. (2021) emphasize that by reducing reliance on virgin resources and optimizing material use, circularity lessens the strain on ecosystems, promoting their resilience (del Río et al., 2021). Through increased recycling and the use of renewable resources, habitats are less disturbed, fostering biodiversity preservation. Furthermore, by mitigating pollution at various stages of production and consumption, circularity contributes to cleaner environments, enhancing the overall health and sustainability of ecosystems (Lacy, Long and Spindler, 2020).
Economic Benefits
The transition to a circular economy offers substantial economic gains, as highlighted by Burns, Eckersley and Tobin (2019) and Millar et al. (2019). One of the economic benefit lies in the potential savings derived from resource efficiency
(Burns, Eckersley and Tobin, 2019). A circular economy optimizes resource utilization, leading to reduced input costs for businesses by Page 7 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 7 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
6
prioritizing reuse, recycling, and remanufacturing. This efficiency translates into tangible savings through diminished reliance on expensive raw materials and reduced waste management expenditures (Millar, McLaughlin and Börger, 2019). The adoption of circular principles spurs the emergence of new business models. Burns, Eckersley and Tobin (2019) emphasizes the innovation and entrepreneurship inherent in circularity, which give rise to novel approaches such as product-
as-a-service and sharing platforms. These models foster collaborative consumption and emphasize product longevity and repairability, thereby creating value from previously untapped resources and services (Addaney and Dumenu, 2023).
Furthermore, the shift to a circular economy stimulates the creation of new markets and job opportunities. de Jesus and Mendonça (2018) highlight how circular practices drive demand for eco-design, remanufacturing, and reverse logistics, consequently generating employment across various sectors (de Jesus and Mendonça, 2018). Industries catering to recycling technologies, waste management, and circular supply chains witness growth, offering job prospects in areas previously underrepresented in the linear economy (Lehmann et al., 2022). The emphasis on innovation and sustainable practices encourages a skilled workforce, spurring job creation in research, development, and the implementation of circular solutions (Lehmann et al., 2022). The economic gains stemming from a circular economy extend beyond cost savings in resource efficiency to encompass the establishment of innovative business models, the creation of new markets, and the generation of diverse job opportunities, fostering economic resilience and sustainability (Lehmann et al., 2022).
Innovation and Resilience
Innovation and technology play pivotal roles in propelling the circular economy forward, as emphasized by Paul (2022) and Weetman (2021). The integration of innovative technologies fuels Page 8 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 8 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
7
the adoption of circular practices by enabling resource recovery, recycling advancements, and sustainable product design. These technological innovations drive efficiency gains, facilitating the transition from a linear to a circular model (Paul, 2022). Moreover, a circular economy bolsters resilience in supply chains and industries. Through diversifying sourcing strategies, circularity reduces dependence on limited resources and vulnerable supply chains (Weetman, 2021).
This resilience is further amplified by the design principles inherent in circularity, such as modularity and durability, ensuring products are built to last and can be easily repaired or repurposed. In addition, Tessaleno Campos Devezas et al. (2022) explain circularity's importance on closing loops within local or regional economies creates a more self-sufficient and adaptable industrial ecosystem, less susceptible to disruptions caused by resource scarcity or global shocks (Tessaleno Campos Devezas et al., 2022). Overall, the symbiotic relationship between innovation, technology, and circularity fortifies industries and supply chains, fostering adaptability and resilience in the face of dynamic challenges (Ritchie and Eric Corey Freed, 2021).
Conclusion
The transition to a circular economy involves both costs and benefits. While initial investments and potential disruptions to traditional economic models pose challenges, the potential gains in resource efficiency, new business opportunities, and environmental preservation emphasize its significance
(Rajput and Singh, 2019). It is essential to acknowledge the necessity of a balanced approach, recognizing the trade-offs inherent in this transition. The economic costs must be weighed against the long-term benefits, emphasizing the need for strategic planning, supportive policies, and collaborative efforts across sectors (Rajput and Singh, 2019). The circular economy offers promising synergies among economic, environmental, and social domains. Its ability to simultaneously drive innovation, create jobs, reduce waste, and mitigate environmental Page 9 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 9 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
8
degradation highlights the potential for integrated solutions to complex challenges. The resilience it inspires in supply chains and industries further describes its value in adapting to evolving economic and environmental landscapes (OECD, 2022).
References
Addaney, M., Jarbandhan, D.B. and William Kwadwo Dumenu (2023). Climate Change in Africa
. Springer Nature. Buchholz, W. and Rübbelke, D. (2019). Foundations of Environmental Economics
. Springer. Burns, C., Eckersley, P. and Tobin, P. (2019). EU environmental policy in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy
, [online] 27(1), pp.1
–
19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1561741. De Angelis, R. (2018). Business Models in the Circular Economy : Concepts, Examples and Theory
. Cham: Springer International Publishing. de Jesus, A. and Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-
innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics
, [online] 145, pp.75
–
89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001. del Río, P., Kiefer, C.P., Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. and Könnölä, T. (2021). The Circular Economy
. Green Energy and Technology
. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74792-3. Eisenriegler, S. (2020). The Circular Economy in the European Union
. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50239-3. Figge, F., Thorpe, A.S. and Gutberlet, M. (2023). Definitions of the circular economy: Circularity matters. Ecological Economics
, 208, p.107823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107823. Filho, W.L. (2017). Sustainable Economic Development
. World Sustainability Series
. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45081-0. Page 10 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 10 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
9
Ghosh, S.K. and Ghosh, S.K. (2021). Circular economy : recent trends in global perspective
. Singapore: Springer. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A. and Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics
, [online] 150(150), pp.264
–
272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028. Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A. and Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and Its Limitations. Ecological Economics
, 143(1), pp.37
–
46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041. Lacy, P., Long, J. and Spindler, W. (2020). The circular economy handbook : realizing the circular advantage
. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Lehmann, H., Christoph Hinske, Victoire de Margerie and Aneta Slaveikova Nikolova (2022). The Impossibilities of the Circular Economy
. Taylor & Francis. Liu, L. (2021). An Introduction to Circular Economy
. [online] Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4. Maria, L. and Vázquez-Brust, D.A. (2023). The Social Dimensions of the Circular Economy
. Springer Nature. Martins, N.O. (2018). The Classical Circular Economy, Sraffian Ecological Economics and the Capabilities Approach. Ecological Economics
, 145, pp.38
–
45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.026. Millar, N., McLaughlin, E. and Börger, T. (2019). The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts? Ecological Economics
, 158, pp.11
–
19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.012. Muthu, S.S. (2021). Circular Economy
. Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes
. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3698-1. Page 11 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 11 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
10
OECD (2022). OECD Urban Studies The Circular Economy in Ireland
. OECD Publishing. Paganetto (2020). Capitalism, Global Change and Sustainable Development
. Springer International Publishing. Paul (2022). Global Climate Change Policy
. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94594-7. Rajput, S. and Singh, S.P. (2019). Industry 4.0 − challe
nges to implement circular economy. Benchmarking: An International Journal
. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-12-2018-0430. Ritchie, K. and Eric Corey Freed (2021). Circular Economy For Dummies
. John Wiley & Sons. Sadhan Kumar Ghosh (2020). Circular economy : global perspective
. Singapore: Springer. Stahel, W.R. and Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2019). The circular economy : a user’s guide
. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, Ny: Routledge. Swain, R.B. (2021). Sustainable Consumption and Production, Volume II
. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55285-5. Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Correia, C., Yegorov, Y. and Dmitry Chistilin (2022). Global Challenges of Climate Change, Vol.1
. Springer Nature. Weetman, C. (2021). A circular economy handbook : how to build a more resilient, competitive and sustainable business
. London, United Kingdom ; New York, Ny: Kogan Page. Whalen, C.J. and Whalen, K.A. (2020). Circular Economy Business Models: A Critical Examination. Journal of Economic Issues
, 54(3), pp.628
–
643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2020.1778404. Page 12 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 12 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
11
Page 13 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829
Page 13 of 13 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2766364829